Background

Optic neuritis (ON) is a frequent manifestation in aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-IgG) seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). Due to limited samples, existing optical coherence tomography (OCT) studies are inconsistent regarding retinal changes in eyes with a history of ON (NMO-ON) and without a history of ON (NMO-NON), and their functional relevance.

Objectives

The CROCTINO (Collaborative Retrospective Study on retinal OCT in Neuromyelitis Optica) project aims to reveal correlates of retinal pathology and to generate hypotheses for prospective OCT studies in NMOSD. The objective of this study was to analyze retinal changes of AQP4-IgG seropositive NMO-ON and NMO-NON eyes in an international cross-sectional OCT dataset.

Methods

Of 656 subjects, we enrolled 283 AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD patients and 72 healthy controls (HC) from 22 international expert centers. OCT data was acquired with Spectralis SD-OCT, Cirrus HD-OCT and Topcon 3D OCT-1. Mean thickness for the combined ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer (GCIP) and inner nuclear layer (INL) were calculated from macular volume scans. Clinical, functional and laboratory testing were performed at discretion of each center.

Results

We compared NMO-ON eyes (N = 260), NMO-NON eyes (N = 241) and HC eyes (N = 136). GCIP was reduced in NMO-ON (57.4 ± 12.2 µm) compared with NMO-NON (75.9 ± 7.7 µm; p < 0.001) and HC (81.4 ± 5.7 µm; p < 0.001). NMO-NON had thinner GCIP (p < 0.001) compared with HC. INL was thicker in NMO-ON (40.3 ± 3.9 µm) compared with NMO-NON (38.6 ± 3.9µm; p < 0.001), but not HC (39.4 ± 2.6 µm). Microcystic macular edema were visible in 6.6 % of NMOSD eyes.

Conclusions

AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD is characterized by a functionally relevant loss of retinal neuroaxonal content and a - probably inflammatory - increase of INL after ON. Our study further supports the existence of attack-independent damage in the visual system of patients with AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD.

Background

Risk factors associated with the severity of COVID-19 in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) begin to be identified from several cohort studies. Disease modifying therapies (DMTs) may modify the risk of developing a severe COVID-19 infection, beside identified risk factors such as age and comorbidities.

Objectives

The objective was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and to identify the factors associated with COVID-19 severity.

Methods

This multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study (COVISEP registry, NCT04355611) included patients with MS presenting with a confirmed or highly suspected diagnosis of COVID-19 between March 1, 2020 and July 14, 2020. The main outcome was COVID-19 severity assessed on a 7-point ordinal scale (ranging from 1: not hospitalized, no limitations on activities, to 7: death; cutoff at 3: hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen). We collected demographics, neurological history, Expanded Disability Severity Score (EDSS), comorbidities, COVID-19 characteristics and outcome. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the influence of collected variables on COVID-19 outcome.

Results

A total of 405 patients (mean age: 44.7 years, female/male: 293/112, mean disease duration: 13.4 years) were analyzed. Seventy-eight patients (19.3%) had a COVID-19 severity score ≥ 3, and 12 patients (3.0%) died from COVID-19. Median EDSS was 2.0 (range: 0-9.5), 326 patients (80.5%) were on DMT. There was a higher proportion of patients with COVID-19 severity score ≥ 3 among patients with no DMT relative to patients on DMTs (39.2% versus 14.4%, p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression models determined that age (OR for 10 years: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.4-2.4), EDSS (OR for EDSS ≥ 6: 4.5, 95% CI: 2.0-10.0) were independent risk factors for COVID-19 severity score ≥ 3 (hospitalization or higher severity) while immunomodulatory treatment (interferon or glatiramer acetate) was associated with lower risk of COVID-19 severity score ≥ 3 (OR: 0.2, 95% CI: 0.05-0.8). EDSS was associated with the highest variability of COVID-19 severe outcome (R²= 0.18), followed by age (R²= 0.06) and immunomodulatory treatment (R²= 0.02).

Conclusions

EDSS and age were independent risk factors of severe COVID-19, while exposure to immunomodulatory DMTs (interferon and glatiramer acetate) were independently associated with lower COVID-19 severity. We did not find an association between other DMTs exposure (including immunosuppressive therapies) and COVID-19 severity. The identification of these risk factors should provide the rationale for an individual strategy regarding clinical management of MS patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background

To predict the clinical course of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-antibody (Ab)-associated disease (MOGAD) is essential to guide treatment recommendations.

Objectives

We aimed to 1) compare clinical features and disease course, and 2) to evaluate the association of MOG-Ab dynamics and relapses, between children and adults with MOGAD.

Methods

Retrospective study evaluating clinical features of 98 children and 266 adults with MOGAD, between January 2014 and September 2019. To analyse relapses over the whole disease course, a Cox regression analysis for recurrent time-to-event data was performed, introducing treatment as time-dependent covariate. To evaluate dynamics, delta mean fluorescence intensity ratio signal (ΔMFIratio) of MOG-Ab was measured in patients with a minimum time elapsed between two samples of 4 months.

Results

Median age at onset of symptoms was 10.9 (interquartile range 5.4-14.3) years in children and 36.2 (27.7-47.6) in adults. Isolated optic neuritis was the most frequent clinical presentation both in children (40.8%) and adults (55.9%), p=0.013, and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis syndrome was more frequent in children (36.7% vs. 5.6%; p<0.001). Compared to adults, children displayed a better recovery (EDSS ≥3.0 at last follow-up reached only by 10 of 97 [10.3%] vs. 66/247 [26.7%], p<0.001).

In the multivariate analysis, adults were at higher risk of relapse than children (Hazard ratio 1.41, 95%Confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.78; p=0.003). Among the 124 participants evaluated for MOG-Ab dynamics, 36.3% became seronegative, 60.5% decrease and 3.2% increase the ΔMFIratio. At two years, 64.2% (95%CI 40.9-86.5) of non-relapsing children became MOG-Ab negative compared to 14.1% (95%CI 4.7-38.3) of relapsing ones, log-rank p<0.001, with no differences observed between non-relapsing and relapsing adults, log-rank p=0.280.

Conclusions

MOGAD differs in its clinical presentation at onset, showing a progressive shift in the clinical features across age-groups. Compared to children, adults have a higher risk of relapses and a worse functional recovery. Finally, children with monophasic disease became MOG-Ab negative earlier than relapsing ones, but not in adults. Considering these differences, management and treatment guidelines should be considered independently in children and adults.

Background

Outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), often treated with immunosuppressive therapies, are still unknown.

Objectives

The objective was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with neuromyelitis optica and associated disorders and to identify the factors associated with COVID-19 severity.

Methods

We conducted a multi-center, retrospective, observational cohort study among all French expert centers for neuromyelitis optica and related disorders. Patients with NMOSD or MOGAD included in the study received a confirmed or highly suspected diagnosis of COVID-19 between March 1, 2020 and June 30^th, 2020. Main outcome was COVID-19 severity score assessed on a 7-point ordinal scale ranging from 1 (not hospitalized with no limitations on activities) to 7 (death).

Results

Fifteen cases (mean [SD] age: 39.3 [14.3] years, 11 female) were included. Five patients (33.3%) were hospitalized, all receiving rituximab. A 24-year-old patient with positive aquaporine-4 antibody, with obesity as comorbidity, needed mechanical ventilation. Outpatients were receiving anti-CD20 (5), mycophenolate mofetil (3) or azathioprine (3). They were younger (mean [SD] age: 37.0 [13.4] years), with a longer disease duration (mean [SD]: 8.3 [6.3] years) and had a lower EDSS score (median [range] EDSS: 2.5 [0-4]) relative to patients requiring hospitalization (mean [SD] age: 44.0 [16.4] years, mean [SD] disease duration: 5.8 [5.5] years, median [range] EDSS: 4 [0-6.5]).

Conclusions

COVID-19 outcome was overall favorable in this cohort. Larger international studies are needed to identify risk factors of severe COVID-19, however we recommend to maintain preventive measures to limit the risk of contamination with SARS-CoV-2 in this immunocompromised population.

Background

Therapeutic options are growing for active RRMS patients, however, few prospective studies are available to compare the efficacy of those treatments. Best Escalation Strategy in MS (BEST MS) started in France in 2013 when natalizumab (NTZ) and fingolimod (FTY) were the two most employed second-line therapies in active RRMS.

Objectives

To compare the efficacy between natalizumab (NTZ) and fingolimod (FTY) in active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

Methods

BEST-MS is a French prospective multicentric study.

Patients with active RRMS (defined as at least 1 relapse in the last 12 months on a well-conducted 1^st line treatment with at least 9 T2 hyperintensities on MRI, OR at least 2 relapses in the last 12 months with evidence of active disease on MRI for naïve patients) were enrolled to be treated either with NTZ or FTY. Treatments choice was at the discretion of the physician.

Relapses, EDSS and brain MRI were collected at baseline and at 12 months.

The main outcome measure was the proportion of patients reaching No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) at 12 months, defined as the absence of relapses, absence of new T2 lesions, absence of new gadolinium enhancing lesions and a stable EDSS score.

Results

230 patients were included (age: 38.2 yrs, F/M: 3.1, FTY: 117, NTZ: 113). There was no statistical difference between groups regarding baseline characteristics.

Treatment drop out rate was higher in FTY group (22% vs 12%, p<0.0001) and most of thoses cases were related to a lack of efficacy.

At M12, 43% of patients treated with NTZ reached NEDA versus 27% in the FTY group (p=0.04)

NTZ indicated a better efficacy regarding new T2 lesions (0.7 vs 1.4, p=0.01) and gadolinium enhancing lesions (0.03 vs 0.5, p<0.0001).

Relapse rate (ARR) was lower in NTZ group (0.2 vs 0.27, p = 0.04), even if most relapses occurred during the first 4 months of treatment in both groups.

Conclusions

NTZ showed higher efficacy than FTY on MRI in active RRMS patients. ARR was also lower in favor of NTZ, but most relapses occurred early. However, the rate of drop out was higher for patients treated with FTY.

Background

The efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab (OCR) in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) were demonstrated in the 96-week controlled double-blind period (DBP) of the Phase III OPERA I (NCT01247324) and OPERA II (NCT01412333) trials.

Objectives

To assess the efficacy of switching from interferon (IFN) β-1a or maintaining OCR therapy on disease activity and confirmed disability progression (CDP) after 4.5 years of follow-up, in the open-label extension (OLE) of OPERA I and OPERA II.

Methods

In the DBP of OPERA I and OPERA II, patients were randomized to receive OCR or IFN β-1a. Patients completing the DBP either continued OCR (OCR-OCR) or switched from IFN β-1a to OCR (IFN-OCR) when entering the OLE period. Adjusted annualized relapse rate (ARR), time to onset of 48-week CDP (CDP48) and time to 48-week confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale score ≥6.0 (time to require a walking aid) were analyzed up to Week 336.

Results

Overall, 79.2% of patients who entered the OLE period completed OLE Year 4.5. Adjusted ARR decreased year-on-year from the pre-switch year to OLE Year 4.5 in IFN-OCR switchers (pre-switch, 0.20; OLE Year 4.5, 0.06) and was maintained at low levels in OCR-OCR continuers (pre-switch, 0.12; OLE Year 4.5, 0.04). The rates of CDP48 were lower in OCR-OCR continuers vs IFN-OCR switchers at the end of the DBP (4.1% vs 8.5%; p<0.001) and at OLE Year 4.5 (16.0% vs 20.3%; p=0.05). The rates of patients requiring a walking aid were lower in OCR-OCR continuers vs IFN-OCR switchers at the end of the DBP (0.8% vs 3.1%; p=0.001) and at OLE Year 4.5 (5.1% vs 8.3%; p=0.024). Over the DBP and OLE periods, the risk of CDP48 was 28% lower (HR [95%CI]: 0.72 [0.56–0.93]; p=0.01) and the risk of requiring a walking aid was 46% lower (HR [95%CI]: 0.54 [0.35–0.83];p=0.004) in OCR-OCR continuers vs IFN-OCR switchers. The safety profile in the OLE was generally consistent with the DBP.

Conclusions

Switching from IFN β-1a to ocrelizumab at the start of the OLE period was associated with a rapid and robust reduction in ARR that was maintained through the 4.5-year follow-up of the OLE period. Compared with patients switching to ocrelizumab at the OLE, patients initiating ocrelizumab 2 years earlier accrued significant benefits on CDP48 and time to require a walking aid that were maintained vs the switch group through the 4.5 years of the OLE period.