Background

Therapeutic options are growing for active RRMS patients, however, few prospective studies are available to compare the efficacy of those treatments. Best Escalation Strategy in MS (BEST MS) started in France in 2013 when natalizumab (NTZ) and fingolimod (FTY) were the two most employed second-line therapies in active RRMS.

Objectives

To compare the efficacy between natalizumab (NTZ) and fingolimod (FTY) in active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

Methods

BEST-MS is a French prospective multicentric study.

Patients with active RRMS (defined as at least 1 relapse in the last 12 months on a well-conducted 1^st line treatment with at least 9 T2 hyperintensities on MRI, OR at least 2 relapses in the last 12 months with evidence of active disease on MRI for naïve patients) were enrolled to be treated either with NTZ or FTY. Treatments choice was at the discretion of the physician.

Relapses, EDSS and brain MRI were collected at baseline and at 12 months.

The main outcome measure was the proportion of patients reaching No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) at 12 months, defined as the absence of relapses, absence of new T2 lesions, absence of new gadolinium enhancing lesions and a stable EDSS score.

Results

230 patients were included (age: 38.2 yrs, F/M: 3.1, FTY: 117, NTZ: 113). There was no statistical difference between groups regarding baseline characteristics.

Treatment drop out rate was higher in FTY group (22% vs 12%, p<0.0001) and most of thoses cases were related to a lack of efficacy.

At M12, 43% of patients treated with NTZ reached NEDA versus 27% in the FTY group (p=0.04)

NTZ indicated a better efficacy regarding new T2 lesions (0.7 vs 1.4, p=0.01) and gadolinium enhancing lesions (0.03 vs 0.5, p<0.0001).

Relapse rate (ARR) was lower in NTZ group (0.2 vs 0.27, p = 0.04), even if most relapses occurred during the first 4 months of treatment in both groups.

Conclusions

NTZ showed higher efficacy than FTY on MRI in active RRMS patients. ARR was also lower in favor of NTZ, but most relapses occurred early. However, the rate of drop out was higher for patients treated with FTY.

Background

Pregnancy management in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) treated by Natalizumab (NTZ) is challenging because of the risk of disease reactivation after treatment discontinuation.

Objectives

To compare clinical disease activity (annual relapse rate) during and after pregnancy among three therapeutic approaches: continuation of NTZ all along the pregnancy and the postpartum, discontinuation of NTZ in the second trimester and discontinuation of NTZ before pregnancy.

Methods

Data were collected from the French MS registry OFSEP (Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques). We included patients with relapsing-remitting MS who started a pregnancy between 6/2013 and 9/2018 while taking NTZ, or within six months after its suspension. 3 groups were compared : continuation of NTZ throughout pregnancy and postpartum (Group 1), 3 to 6 months of exposure to NTZ during pregnancy (Group 2) and suspension prior to pregnancy (Group 3). Annual relapse rate (ARR) during 2 years (9 months before and 15 months after preganncy onset) was the primaty outcome and effect on EDSS and MRI were secondary end-points.

The main analysis was performed using a negative binomial regression with the follow-up duration as the offset term. Univariate and multivariate anlyses after adjustment for baseline variables (age, EDSS, ARR in the year before starting NTZ, first-line patient on NTZ vs. second-line patient).

Results

117 patients from 27 centers* were included. Baseline mean age was 31,5 y, median EDSS was 2.0 and mean duration of disease was 7,89 y. The mean ARR were respectively 0.078 +/- 0.24 in Group 1, 0.308 +/- 0.43 in Group 2 and 0.456 +/- 0.63 in Group 3 during the observation period and was significantly higher in Groups 2 and 3 as compared with ARR in Group 1 (p=0,007). The risk of relapses was 4 times higher in Group 2 versus Group 1 (p=0,014) and 6 times higher in Group 3 versus Group 1 (p=0,001).

Multivariate analyses did not show any effect of the adjustment variables.

Evaluation of safety outcomes on the mother and the fetus is in progress.

* Investigators: AR, JCO, CD, PB (Bordeaux), SD, BA, AR, AM, CB, JP (Marseille), MD, S Pitton (Nancy), JD (Strasbourg), TM (Dijon), JC, D Biotti (Toulouse), OC, M Vaillant (Grenoble),E Berger (Besançon), D Laplaud (Nantes), G Defer (Caen), I Patry (Corbeil-Essonnes), P Vermersch (Lille), P Labauge (Montpellier), O Bourre (Rouen), B Stankoff (Paris-Saint-Antoine), A Créange (Créteil), P Cabre (Fort-de-France), E Thouvenot (Nîmes), T De Broucker (Saint-Denis), C Papeix (Paris-Salpêtrière), P Clavelou (Clermont-Ferrand), O Gout (Paris-F.Rothschild), A Montcuquet (Limoges), C Lebrun (Nice), O Heinzlef (Poissy) N Maubeuge (Poitiers).

Conclusions

Continuation of Natalizumab during all three trimesters of pregnancy is associated with a lower risk of relapses as compared with discontinuation before the pregnancy or even during the second trimester.

Safety data is being collected.

Background

Previous real-world comparative research of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) disease modifying therapies (DMTs) provided conflicting results on the effectiveness of the dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in comparison to the injectable immunomodulatory drugs (IID), and the two other oral drugs, fingolimod (FTY) and teriflunomide (TERI), in reducing relapses.

Objectives

To assess the effectiveness of DMF on annual rate of relapse (ARR) in MS compared to IID, TERI and FTY, in real life setting.

Methods

This cohort study included all patients identified in the French national claims-based database (SNDS) initiating IID, TERI, FTY or DMF from the 2015/07/01 to the 2017/12/31, with at least 4.5-year history and with 1 to 3.5 years of follow-up. The index date was the date of first DMT fill. The primary endpoint was the ARR, identified by a validated algorithm including MS hospitalizations and dispensing of corticosteroids on high dose (Positive Predictive Value: 95.2%). DMF patients were high dimensional Propensity Score 1:1 matched to IID, TERI or FTY based on data collected in the pre-index period. A negative binomial regression model and a regression logistic model were used to estimate the relative risk (RR ± [95% CI]) of ARR and the Odds Ratio (OR ± [95% CI]) of disability progression, respectively.

Results

We identified 9 304 subjects in the SNDS: 29.0% initiated DMF, 33.2% TERI, 5.6% FTY and 32.2% an IID. Overall, 72.8% were female with a mean age of 39.9 years (from 37.5 years for IID to 43.1 years for TERI) and a mean Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 0.58 (from 0.52 for DMF to 0.65 for TERI). In each treatment group, the 1:1 matched cohorts consisted in 1779 DMF-IID patients, 1679 DMF-TERI patients, and 376 DMF-FTY patients. During the index treatment exposure, DMF significantly reduced ARR compared to IID (RR 0.72, 95%CI [0.61 - 0.86]) and TERI (RR 0.81, 95%CI [0.68 - 0.96]). No significant difference on ARR was found between DMF and FTY patients (RR 1.38, 95%CI [0.95 - 1.99]), but the specific indication of FTY for the treatment of MS patients with high activity of the disease makes the comparison between both groups difficult.

Conclusions

Based on real-life data, DMF offers an effective treatment option to reduce the risk of relapse for patients with RRMS compared to other commonly used agents for RRMS including another oral drug, TERI.

Background

In secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS), reduction in the rates of disability accrual after starting disease modifying therapy (DMT) has largely been limited to patients with ongoing inflammatory activity. A delayed treatment effect, termed therapeutic lag, may obscure therapeutic benefits in SPMS.

Objectives

To compare the effect of high and low efficacy DMT on disability outcomes in patients with recently active and inactive SPMS after accounting for therapeutic lag.

Methods

Using data from MSBase, a multinational MS registry, and OFSEP, the French MS registry, we identified patients with SPMS as per a previously validated objective definition. We identified patients treated with high- (natalizumab, alemtuzumab, mitoxantrone, ocrelizumab, rituximab, cladribine, fingolimod) or low-efficacy (interferons, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide) DMT after SPMS onset. Based on our previous work, an individualised estimate of duration of therapeutic lag was calculated for each patient. Only events that occurred after the estimated therapeutic lag period were included in the analysis. Propensity score matching was used to select groups with comparable baseline characteristics. Disability and relapse outcomes were compared in paired, pairwise-censored analyses adjusted for visit density.

Results

Of 7359 patients with SPMS, 1000 patients fulfilled the criteria for study inclusion (510 active SPMS, 490 inactive SPMS). For the relapse outcomes, patients with active SPMS treated with high-efficacy DMTs experienced lower probabilities of relapses than low-efficacy DMTs (hazard ratio [HR] 0.7 [95%CI 0.5-0.9], p=0.006). Patients with inactive SPMS had similar probabilities of relapses in the high and low efficacy DMT groups (0.8 [0.6-1.2], p=0.39). No difference in the risk of 6-month sustained disability accumulation, or proportion of patients reaching EDSS>=7, was observed between groups when accounting for therapeutic lag.

Conclusions

The risk of disability accumulation in SPMS seems to be comparable in patients treated with high- and low- efficacy DMT. High efficacy DMT is superior to low efficacy therapy in reducing relapse activity in patients with active SPMS, but not those with inactive SPMS. Pre-treatment inflammatory activity, clinical or radiological, is a treatable target in SPMS which may benefit from higher-efficacy anti-inflammatory therapies.