Author Of 1 Presentation
P0193 - BEST-MS: A standardized and prospective study comparing the efficacy of natalizumab versus fingolimod in active relapsing multiple sclerosis (ID 237)
Therapeutic options are growing for active RRMS patients, however, few prospective studies are available to compare the efficacy of those treatments. Best Escalation Strategy in MS (BEST MS) started in France in 2013 when natalizumab (NTZ) and fingolimod (FTY) were the two most employed second-line therapies in active RRMS.
To compare the efficacy between natalizumab (NTZ) and fingolimod (FTY) in active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).
BEST-MS is a French prospective multicentric study.
Patients with active RRMS (defined as at least 1 relapse in the last 12 months on a well-conducted 1st line treatment with at least 9 T2 hyperintensities on MRI, OR at least 2 relapses in the last 12 months with evidence of active disease on MRI for naïve patients) were enrolled to be treated either with NTZ or FTY. Treatments choice was at the discretion of the physician.
Relapses, EDSS and brain MRI were collected at baseline and at 12 months.
The main outcome measure was the proportion of patients reaching No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) at 12 months, defined as the absence of relapses, absence of new T2 lesions, absence of new gadolinium enhancing lesions and a stable EDSS score.
230 patients were included (age: 38.2 yrs, F/M: 3.1, FTY: 117, NTZ: 113). There was no statistical difference between groups regarding baseline characteristics.
Treatment drop out rate was higher in FTY group (22% vs 12%, p<0.0001) and most of thoses cases were related to a lack of efficacy.
At M12, 43% of patients treated with NTZ reached NEDA versus 27% in the FTY group (p=0.04)
NTZ indicated a better efficacy regarding new T2 lesions (0.7 vs 1.4, p=0.01) and gadolinium enhancing lesions (0.03 vs 0.5, p<0.0001).
Relapse rate (ARR) was lower in NTZ group (0.2 vs 0.27, p = 0.04), even if most relapses occurred during the first 4 months of treatment in both groups.
NTZ showed higher efficacy than FTY on MRI in active RRMS patients. ARR was also lower in favor of NTZ, but most relapses occurred early. However, the rate of drop out was higher for patients treated with FTY.