Background

the management of MS patients (pts) who show disease activity after 2 alemtuzumab (ALM) courses represents an unsolved issue. No real-life data about the switch to ocrelizumab (OCR) have been reported yet.

Objectives

To describe efficacy and safety outcome of OCR patients switching from ALM due to persistence of disease activity after ALM

Methods

MS pts who switched from ALM to OCR from March 2019 to March 2020 were retro- and prospectively recruited from different Italian MS Centers. Clinical, immunological and neuroradiological data about ALM treatment period, ALM-OCR interval and OCR treatment period were collected.

Results

we recruited 23 MS pts [mean age: 35.7(SD±6.8); female, 40.1%; Relapsing Remitting, (RR): 75.8%, active Secondary progressive, (aSP): 24.2%; mean time interval (days) from II ALM course: 87.4(SD±108); cumulative number of relapses: 21; mean number of new T2 and Gd+ lesions: 4.1(SD±4.5) and 1.6(SD±3.1); median EDSS:3(range 1-7)]. The mean follow-up (FU) from OCR start was 7.9±7.4 months. Efficacy: 4 (17.4%) pts had a relapse after OCR start (1 pt relapsed between the first and the second OCR infusion and 3 pts after 3, 11 and 15 months from OCR start respectively), with complete recovery after steroid treatment. 4 (17.4%) pts showed radiological activity with no clinical correlates at 3 months (n=2), 4 months (n=1) and 9 months (n=1). EDSS was stable except for 1 aSP patient who showed 1-year disability progression. Safety: I) Infusion Associated Reactions (IARs) occurrence was significantly lower with respect to alemtuzumab courses (p<0.05); (ii) infections: mild upper airways (n=1), urinary infections (n=1), appendicectomy (n=1) and fever due to probable Sars-Cov2 infection (n=1). For 12 pts, data about immunophenotype were available. Of them, no pts showed T CD4+ cell count decrease <200 cell/mm3 at 3, 6-months and 1-year FU; complete B CD19+ cell depletion (<5 cell/mm3) was confirmed at 3, 6-months and 1-year FU. 10 (43.4%) pts developed hypogammaglobulinemia without developing associated infectious events. C) Autoimmunity: no alemtuzumab-related new complications occurred.

Conclusions

short-term FU seems to suggest that the switch to OCR in MS patients who showed disease activity after 2 ALM courses is characterized by a good safety and efficacy profile, although clinical and neuroradiological activity can be detected both in an early and in a later phase of treatment. Longer follow-up is warranted and recruitment is still ongoing.

Background

Background. Lymphopenia monitoring during treatment with disease modifying drugs for MS is relevant because of the potential increased risk of infections. Lymphopenia is an anticipated effect of cladribine (CLD) treatment, given its mechanism of action.

Objectives

Objectives. We aimed to i) characterize the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) changes, and ii) evaluate the risk of infections in CLD-treated RRMS patients. ALCs were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0).

Methods

Materials and methods. In this observational multicentre study, demographic, clinical and MRI data of the patients included in the Free Of Charge CLD program were collected. ALC was also collected at baseline (before therapy initiation) and at month 3, 7, 12, 15, 19 and 24.

Results

Results. 236 patients were enrolled in 56 Italian MS Centres (71% F; mean age: 39+11.5 years; mean disease duration: 10+8.5 years). The median baseline EDSS was 3.0 (quartiles 1.5-3.5; range 0-6.5). 53 patients (22.5%) were treatment naïve, 107 (45.3%) switched to CLD from first line DMDs (for inefficacy), 76 (32.2%) switched to CLD after a second line therapy (33/76 for safety reason, 43/76 for inefficacy). Mean follow up was 12.2+5 months. At baseline, median ALC was 1615.0 cell/mm³ (quartiles, 1300.0-2200.0). At month 3, ALC was available in 190/236 and 101/190 had lymphopenia: 12 (6.3%) grade 3, 47 (24.7%) grade 2 and 42 (22.1%) grade 1. Among patients presenting grade 3 at month 3, only one had persistent ALC <500 cell/mm³ at month 7. At month 7, ALC was available in 180/236 and 77/180 had lymphopenia: 1 (0.6%) grade 4, 1 (0.6%) grade 3, 43 (23.9%) grade 2 and 32 (17.8%) grade 1. Up to date, 159/236 patients were re-treated. No retreatment was delayed because of grade 4 lymphopenia. No patient presented grade 4 lymphopenia at month 15, 6/89 (6.6%) experienced grade 3, 37/89 (40.7%) grade 2, 17/89 (18.7%) grade 1. At month 19, 1/38 (2.6%) presented grade 3 lymphopenia, 11/38 (29.0%) grade 2 and 9/38 (23.7%) grade 1. At month 24, 1/9 (11.1%) patient presented grade 3 and 1/9 (11.1%) presented grade 4 lymphopenia. During treatment course, 15 patients experienced infections (1 VZV, 3 HSV), none occurring in grade 3 or 4 lymphopenia.

Conclusions

Conclusions. In our study, the risk of grade 3 and 4 lymphopenia was lower compared to that observed in RCT. Moreover, grade 3 lymphopenia was transient in the majority of the patients. Compared to RTC, a more favourable CLD safety profile emerged in our study.

Background

No clear metrics for sensitive and reliable identification of the transition from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) to secondary progressive (SP)MS are available.

Objectives

To compare diagnostic performances of two different data-driven Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis definitions.

Methods

patient with RRMS with a follow-up ≥5 years, with a current age ≥18 years, and with ≥3 EDSS scores recorded were selected from the Italian MS Registry. Annual incidence of SPMS conversion was reported as number of patients converting to SP every 100 patients/year. Three different SPMS definitions have been used. Data-driven definitions based on the Lorscheider’s algorithm (LA) and on the EXPAND trial inclusion criteria were validated, using the neurologist’s definition as gold standard, in terms of calibration, discrimination and goodness of fit by calculating: sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV), the Akaike information criterion (AIC), the Area Under the Curve (AUC). The overall calibration of the data-driven definitions was evaluated by the Calibration Slope test.

Results

a cohort of 10,240 RRMS patients was extracted from the Italian MS Registry. According to the neurologist judgment, 880 (8.59%) patients were classified as SPMS in the dataset. By applying the LA and the EXPAND definition, 1,806 (17.64%) and 1,134 (11.07%) patients, respectively, were classified as SPMS. The annual rate of SP conversion during the follow-up was 0.74 every 100 patients/year based on the neurologist’s definition, 1.57 every 100 patients/year using the LA and 0.94 every 100 patients/year applying the EXPAND definition. Both the data-driven definitions were well calibrated, with a p-value of the Calibration Slope test higher than 0.05 (LA=0.55; EXPAND definition=0.57). The AIC (LA=4301; EXPAND definition=5510) and the R-Square (LA=0.15 vs EXPAND definition=0.05), were in favor of the LA. The LA showed a greater discrimination power (AUC: 0.83 vs 0.65) and a higher sensitivity (77.1% vs 38.0%) in comparison to the EXPAND definition. Both definitions showed similar specificity (88.0% vs 91.5%). The PPV and the NPV were both higher using the LA than those obtained by the EXPAND definition (37.5% vs 29.5%; 97.6% vs 94.0%, respectively).

Conclusions

An accurate definition of SP transition is needed for a timely and efficacious treatment of SPMS patients. Real-world data from the Italian MS Registry suggests that data-driven definitions had a greater ability to capture SP transition than neurologist’s definition and that the global accuracy of LA seems to be higher than a definition based on the EXPAND trial inclusion criteria.

Background

Trials leading to Cladribine (CLD) approval for the treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) were conducted over a decade ago: there is a need of proof of CLD efficacy and safety profile in the present MS therapeutic landscape.

Objectives

To evaluate CLD efficacy and safety profile in the current MS population, and to identify early predictors of response.

Methods

Before the drug was marketed under the national healthcare system, in Italy CLD was available through a Free Of Charge (FOC) program. We asked all participating MS centres to contribute to the present study, collecting demographic, clinical and MRI data of the patients who received CLD in the FOC program.

Results

56 MS centres participated to the study, for a total of 236 patients (71% F) (mean age: 39 + 11,5 years; mean disease duration: 10 + 8,5 years). Mean Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) in the two years before CLD was 0,7 + 0,6; median baseline EDSS was 3 (quartiles 1,5-3,5; range 0-6,5). 53 patients (22,5%) were treatment naïve, 107 (45,3%) switched to CLD from first-line DMDs (for inefficacy), 76 (32,2%) switched to CLD from a second line therapy (33/76 for safety or loss of tolerability, 43/76 for inefficacy). Mean follow up was 12,2 + 5 months. 84,7% of the patients were relapse-free at follow-up. Mean ARR at follow-up was 0,2 + 0,6. Patients taking CLD as first therapy were less likely to experience a relapse (HR 0,6; 95% CI: 0,2-0,8; p = 0,04) while a higher baseline ARR was a predictor of clinical activity (HR 2,7, 95% CI: 1,4-5,6; p = 0,004). Median EDSS at follow up was 2 (quartiles 1-3,5). EDSS was stable in 73.7%, improved of at least 1 point in 21,6% and worsened of at least 1 point in 4,7% of the patients. 157/236 patients completed one year of follow up. Of these 92 (59,7%) reached No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-3); NEDA-3 was achieved more frequently by naive patients (70%) than switchers from a first (57%) or a second line (50%) (HR 2,3; 95% CI: 1,01-5,3; p = 0,04). 33/236 patients reported at least one adverse event (AE), most frequently infections (15 cases); other AEs included gastrointestinal side effects, cutaneous rash, aphthous stomatitis and headache. Two severe AEs were reported (one pneumonia, one melanoma).

Conclusions

Even with the limitations of a retrospective study, our data confirm CLD safety and efficacy profile. Consistently with previous studies on patients with a first demyelinating event, CLD efficacy is maximized when used early in the course of MS.

Background

A wash-out duration lasting >1–2 months between the majority of sequential disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is associated with an increased risk of disease reactivation in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients.

Fingolimod (FTY) induces sequestration of lymphocytes in secondary lymphoid organs and the average lymphocyte recovery following discontinuation takes 1-2 months. It has been hypothesized that the therapeutic effects of subsequent cell-depleting agents may be compromised if lymphocyte recovery is still incomplete and that shorter wash-out periods do not affect the disease reactivation risk.

Objectives

To assess the risk of relapses following FTY discontinuation and the initiation of a B/T cell-depleting agent initiation in relation to the duration of wash-out between the drugs using data from the Italian MS Registry.

Methods

Patients who initiated alemtuzumab, rituximab, ocrelizumab or cladribine within six months of FTY discontinuation, and with a follow-up of at least six months, or until a relapse occurred, were included in the study. The risk of relapses was assessed in relation to different wash-out durations (<6, 6-11, 12-17 and >/=18 weeks) using a Poisson regression analysis (and reported as incidence rate ratio - IRR) and a Cox proportional hazards model including age, disease duration, relapses during FTY treatment, EDSS and reason for FTY discontinuation as covariates.

Results

Inclusion criteria were met by 329 patients (226F, 103M; mean age 41±10 years). Following a median wash-out period of 11 weeks [IQR: 6-16], 175 patients started alemtuzumab, 69 rituximab, 68 ocrelizumab and 17 cladribine. Ninety patients relapsed during the wash-out period and 72 during the subsequent cell-depleting therapy. During the cell-depleting treatment, IRR for a relapse was significantly greater in patients with a washout-period of 12-17 (IRR (95%CI): 2.4 (1,1-5,5); p=0.037) and >/=18 weeks (6.0 (2.8-12.7); p<0.001) compared to the reference period (<6 weeks).

The multivariable Cox analysis showed that the time to a relapse was significantly influenced by the occurrence of relapses during FTY treatment (HR (95%CI): 1.4 (1.2-1.7); p<0.001). Moreover, wash-out durations of 6-11, 12-17 and >/=18 weeks were associated with a higher risk of a relapse in comparison to wash-out durations shorter than 6 weeks (3.8 (1.1-13.2); p=0.037; 6.0 (1.7-21.9); p=0.006; 16.3 (4.8-56.3); p<0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

The risk of relapses during a cell-depleting therapy following a sequestering agent, namely FTY, increases progressively with the duration of wash-out, underlining the need of a short wash-out period also in this type of treatment sequence.