Author Of 3 Presentations
P0100 - Italian prospective multicentric observational real-life study of aggressive Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis treated with alemtuzumab (ID 1730)
- L. Moiola
- M. Di Cristinzi
- A. Sultana
- C. Zanetta
- F. Rinaldi
- L. Brambilla
- J. Frau
- S. Malucchi
- P. Annovazzi
- G. Puorro
- A. Bianco
- G. Lus
- P. Cavalla
- F. Sangalli
- M. Romeo
- G. Marfia
- A. Gallo
- V. Barcella
- S. Bucello
- M. Ferrò
- C. Lapucci
- L. Chiveri
- C. Chisari
- E. Baldi
- R. Clerici
- P. Banfi
- C. Tortorella
- R. Totaro
- R. Cerqua
- S. Tonietti
- V. Mantero
- G. Santuccio
- M. Filippi
Abstract
Background
Alemtuzumab(ALEM) is an anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of active Multiple Sclerosis(MS) which showed an overall high efficacy in clinical trials, also in the highly active subgroup of patients.
Objectives
The aim of this multicenter obervational study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of ALEM-treatment in a population of aggressive MS naïve-patients at year 2 and 3 after a complete cycle of treatment.
Methods
We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study in a cohort of ALEM-naïve MS patients. Clinical and neuroradiological parameters were collected from patients’ clinical records in 26 Italian MS Centers from October 2015 to May 2020.
Results
133 naïve patients were treated with ALEM: 60,2% females, mean age 31,4(± 8,9) years, mean disease duration 18,5(± 22,7) months, mean follow-up(FU) 34,2(± 12,1) months, median EDSS 3(0-6,5), ARR in the year preceding treatment 1,8 (± 0,9), mean number of brain T2/FLAIR-hyperintense lesions 29,8 (± 20,8) and mean number of Gd-enhancing lesions 3,4(± 5,1). Regarding ALEM efficacy, we report data obtained after the first complete cycle of treatment (2 ALEM-courses) because the occurrence of disease activity between the first and second course is not indicative of a therapeutic failure. 99 and 61 over 133 patients have at least 24 and 36 months FU respectively: 97% and 82% were relapse-free, ARR was 0,02 and 0,1, 92.9% and 82% were MRI activity-free and 97,7% and 91,8% progression-free with median EDSS of 2,0 and 1,5 (IQR 1 – 2,5) at year 2 and 3. The mean time to first relapse was 27,6(± 6,4) months 89,2% and 69,4% of patients reached NEDA-3 at year 2 and year 3 respectively. 5,3% of patients needed a third cycle of therapy. Overall 74,4% of patients had adverse events. Infusion-reaction and infections occurred respectively in 70,1% and 9,8% of patients; regarding secondary autoimmune disease the most frequent was thyroid dysfunction (15,8%).
Conclusions
In our very active MS-population after ALEM-treatment a strong reduction of both relapse rate and MRI activity was achieved. These results strengthen the assumption that aggressive naïve patient is an ideal candidate for immune system resetting, likely due to young age, short disease duration and low disability. Furthermore, absence of previous immunomodulating/immunosuppressant drugs altering the immune system could play a key role in determining effectiveness of this powerful drug. However, longer FU is needed to confirm our data and evaluate whether an early induction therapy could be worthy in this specific population, balancing benefit-risk ratio.
P0273 - A multicentre, real-life study on the risk of lymphopenia and infections discloses a favourable safety profile of cladribine in MS patients. (ID 1086)
Abstract
Background
Background. Lymphopenia monitoring during treatment with disease modifying drugs for MS is relevant because of the potential increased risk of infections. Lymphopenia is an anticipated effect of cladribine (CLD) treatment, given its mechanism of action.
Objectives
Objectives. We aimed to i) characterize the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) changes, and ii) evaluate the risk of infections in CLD-treated RRMS patients. ALCs were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0).
Methods
Materials and methods. In this observational multicentre study, demographic, clinical and MRI data of the patients included in the Free Of Charge CLD program were collected. ALC was also collected at baseline (before therapy initiation) and at month 3, 7, 12, 15, 19 and 24.
Results
Results. 236 patients were enrolled in 56 Italian MS Centres (71% F; mean age: 39+11.5 years; mean disease duration: 10+8.5 years). The median baseline EDSS was 3.0 (quartiles 1.5-3.5; range 0-6.5). 53 patients (22.5%) were treatment naïve, 107 (45.3%) switched to CLD from first line DMDs (for inefficacy), 76 (32.2%) switched to CLD after a second line therapy (33/76 for safety reason, 43/76 for inefficacy). Mean follow up was 12.2+5 months. At baseline, median ALC was 1615.0 cell/mm3 (quartiles, 1300.0-2200.0). At month 3, ALC was available in 190/236 and 101/190 had lymphopenia: 12 (6.3%) grade 3, 47 (24.7%) grade 2 and 42 (22.1%) grade 1. Among patients presenting grade 3 at month 3, only one had persistent ALC <500 cell/mm3 at month 7. At month 7, ALC was available in 180/236 and 77/180 had lymphopenia: 1 (0.6%) grade 4, 1 (0.6%) grade 3, 43 (23.9%) grade 2 and 32 (17.8%) grade 1. Up to date, 159/236 patients were re-treated. No retreatment was delayed because of grade 4 lymphopenia. No patient presented grade 4 lymphopenia at month 15, 6/89 (6.6%) experienced grade 3, 37/89 (40.7%) grade 2, 17/89 (18.7%) grade 1. At month 19, 1/38 (2.6%) presented grade 3 lymphopenia, 11/38 (29.0%) grade 2 and 9/38 (23.7%) grade 1. At month 24, 1/9 (11.1%) patient presented grade 3 and 1/9 (11.1%) presented grade 4 lymphopenia. During treatment course, 15 patients experienced infections (1 VZV, 3 HSV), none occurring in grade 3 or 4 lymphopenia.
Conclusions
Conclusions. In our study, the risk of grade 3 and 4 lymphopenia was lower compared to that observed in RCT. Moreover, grade 3 lymphopenia was transient in the majority of the patients. Compared to RTC, a more favourable CLD safety profile emerged in our study.
P0910 - Relapse-free and NEDA status with Cladribine in a real life population: a multicentre study (ID 1484)
Abstract
Background
Trials leading to Cladribine (CLD) approval for the treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) were conducted over a decade ago: there is a need of proof of CLD efficacy and safety profile in the present MS therapeutic landscape.
Objectives
To evaluate CLD efficacy and safety profile in the current MS population, and to identify early predictors of response.
Methods
Before the drug was marketed under the national healthcare system, in Italy CLD was available through a Free Of Charge (FOC) program. We asked all participating MS centres to contribute to the present study, collecting demographic, clinical and MRI data of the patients who received CLD in the FOC program.
Results
56 MS centres participated to the study, for a total of 236 patients (71% F) (mean age: 39 + 11,5 years; mean disease duration: 10 + 8,5 years). Mean Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) in the two years before CLD was 0,7 + 0,6; median baseline EDSS was 3 (quartiles 1,5-3,5; range 0-6,5). 53 patients (22,5%) were treatment naïve, 107 (45,3%) switched to CLD from first-line DMDs (for inefficacy), 76 (32,2%) switched to CLD from a second line therapy (33/76 for safety or loss of tolerability, 43/76 for inefficacy). Mean follow up was 12,2 + 5 months. 84,7% of the patients were relapse-free at follow-up. Mean ARR at follow-up was 0,2 + 0,6. Patients taking CLD as first therapy were less likely to experience a relapse (HR 0,6; 95% CI: 0,2-0,8; p = 0,04) while a higher baseline ARR was a predictor of clinical activity (HR 2,7, 95% CI: 1,4-5,6; p = 0,004). Median EDSS at follow up was 2 (quartiles 1-3,5). EDSS was stable in 73.7%, improved of at least 1 point in 21,6% and worsened of at least 1 point in 4,7% of the patients. 157/236 patients completed one year of follow up. Of these 92 (59,7%) reached No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-3); NEDA-3 was achieved more frequently by naive patients (70%) than switchers from a first (57%) or a second line (50%) (HR 2,3; 95% CI: 1,01-5,3; p = 0,04). 33/236 patients reported at least one adverse event (AE), most frequently infections (15 cases); other AEs included gastrointestinal side effects, cutaneous rash, aphthous stomatitis and headache. Two severe AEs were reported (one pneumonia, one melanoma).
Conclusions
Even with the limitations of a retrospective study, our data confirm CLD safety and efficacy profile. Consistently with previous studies on patients with a first demyelinating event, CLD efficacy is maximized when used early in the course of MS.
Presenter Of 1 Presentation
P0910 - Relapse-free and NEDA status with Cladribine in a real life population: a multicentre study (ID 1484)
Abstract
Background
Trials leading to Cladribine (CLD) approval for the treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) were conducted over a decade ago: there is a need of proof of CLD efficacy and safety profile in the present MS therapeutic landscape.
Objectives
To evaluate CLD efficacy and safety profile in the current MS population, and to identify early predictors of response.
Methods
Before the drug was marketed under the national healthcare system, in Italy CLD was available through a Free Of Charge (FOC) program. We asked all participating MS centres to contribute to the present study, collecting demographic, clinical and MRI data of the patients who received CLD in the FOC program.
Results
56 MS centres participated to the study, for a total of 236 patients (71% F) (mean age: 39 + 11,5 years; mean disease duration: 10 + 8,5 years). Mean Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) in the two years before CLD was 0,7 + 0,6; median baseline EDSS was 3 (quartiles 1,5-3,5; range 0-6,5). 53 patients (22,5%) were treatment naïve, 107 (45,3%) switched to CLD from first-line DMDs (for inefficacy), 76 (32,2%) switched to CLD from a second line therapy (33/76 for safety or loss of tolerability, 43/76 for inefficacy). Mean follow up was 12,2 + 5 months. 84,7% of the patients were relapse-free at follow-up. Mean ARR at follow-up was 0,2 + 0,6. Patients taking CLD as first therapy were less likely to experience a relapse (HR 0,6; 95% CI: 0,2-0,8; p = 0,04) while a higher baseline ARR was a predictor of clinical activity (HR 2,7, 95% CI: 1,4-5,6; p = 0,004). Median EDSS at follow up was 2 (quartiles 1-3,5). EDSS was stable in 73.7%, improved of at least 1 point in 21,6% and worsened of at least 1 point in 4,7% of the patients. 157/236 patients completed one year of follow up. Of these 92 (59,7%) reached No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-3); NEDA-3 was achieved more frequently by naive patients (70%) than switchers from a first (57%) or a second line (50%) (HR 2,3; 95% CI: 1,01-5,3; p = 0,04). 33/236 patients reported at least one adverse event (AE), most frequently infections (15 cases); other AEs included gastrointestinal side effects, cutaneous rash, aphthous stomatitis and headache. Two severe AEs were reported (one pneumonia, one melanoma).
Conclusions
Even with the limitations of a retrospective study, our data confirm CLD safety and efficacy profile. Consistently with previous studies on patients with a first demyelinating event, CLD efficacy is maximized when used early in the course of MS.