Background

to date, no consensus exists on how aggressively and timely treat relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients.

Objectives

To evaluate disability trajectories in a cohort of RRMS patients stratified according to two different disease modifying therapy (DMT) strategies, early intensive treatment (EIT) or moderate-efficacy treatment followed by escalation to higher-efficacy DMT (ESC).

Methods

RRMS patients with ≥5-year follow-up and ≥3 visits after start DMT, and a first visit within 3 years from disease onset were selected from the Italian MS Registry. EIT group included patients who received, as first DMT, fingolimod, natalizumab, mitoxantrone, alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, cladribine. ESC group included those who received the high efficacy DMT after ≥1 year of glatiramer acetate, interferons, azathioprine, teriflunomide or dimethylfumarate treatment. Patients were 1:1 propensity score(PS)-matched for characteristics at the first DMT. The follow-up time from the first DMT start has been segmented into 12-month periods. The disability trajectories were evaluated by applying a longitudinal model for repeated measures with an autoregressive variance-covariance structure. The effect of early versus late start of high-efficacy DMT was assessed by the mean annual EDSS changes compared to baseline values (delta-EDSS) in EIT and ESC groups.

Results

The study cohort included 2,652 RRMS patients from 62 Italian MS centers. The PS matching procedure produced 365 pairs. The median (IQR) follow-up after the first DMT start was 8.5 (6.5–11.7) years. All of the ESC patients escalated to a higher-efficacy DMT after a median time of 5.1 (3.1–8.4) years. The estimated baseline EDSS with relative confidence interval (95% CI) value was 2.52 (2.33-2.71) in the ESC group and 2.45 (2.26-2.64) in the EIT group. Mean delta-EDSS at each 12 month period were all significantly (p<0.02) higher in the ESC group compared to the EIT group. In particular, the mean delta-EDSS differences between the two groups tend to increase from 0.1 (0.01-0.19, p=0.03) at 1 year to 0.30 (0.07-0.53, p=0.009) at 5 years and to 0.67 (0.31-1.03, p=0.0003) at 10 years.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that EIT strategy is more effective than ESC strategy in controlling disability progression and the effect tends to increase over time despite patients in the ESC group escalated to a higher-efficacy DMT.

Background

Background: Except for ocrelizumab, treatment options in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) are lacking, as randomized clinical trials failed to show efficacy in reducing disability progression in this patient population.

Objectives

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of disease-modifying treatment (DMT) on hard disability outcomes (EDSS 6 and 7) in a real-life population of PPMS patients.

Methods

Methods: Using the Italian MS Registry, we selected PPMS patients with at least three EDSS evaluations and three years of follow-up. Study baseline was defined as the first EDSS evaluation for untreated patients and the date of the first DMT initiation for treated patients. The impact of DMT on the risk of reaching EDSS 6 and 7 was assessed as a dichotomous variable (yes versus no) and as a time-dependent covariate through multivariable Cox regression models (adjusted for age at baseline, sex, first EDSS score, symptoms at onset, annualized visit rate, annualized relapse rate). We compared outcomes with an as-treated analysis and used propensity-score matching (PSM) to select cohorts with comparable baseline characteristics. DMT-exposure was also evaluated in terms of quartiles of exposure.

Results

Results: Of the 1214 patients we included 671 females, mean ± Standard Deviation baseline age 48.7 ± 11.1 years, mean EDSS score 4.1 ± 1.8, 790 (65%) received a DMT during the follow-up (57% platform and 43% highly active treatments). In the whole sample, after a mean follow-up of 11.6 ± 6.3 years, 994 (82%) patients reached EDSS 6 and 539 (44%) EDSS 7. In the multivariable Cox regression models, the use of DMT analyzed as a dichotomous variable did not influence the risk of reaching EDSS 6 (aHR=1.1, 95% CI 0.95-1.28, p=0.181) and EDSS 7 (aHR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.77-1.12. p = 0.454). However, longer DMT exposure significantly reduced the risk of reaching EDSS 7 (aHR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.56-0.95, p =0.021). Of note, patients in the upper quartile of DMT exposure compared with those with shorter DMT exposure were younger at baseline (mean age 44.1 ± 10.6 years; p < 0.001) and received the first DMT closer to the disease onset (mean time to first DMT 6.8 years ± 6.1 ; p=0.002). All these findings were confirmed in the PSM analysis.

Conclusions

Conclusion: Our results suggest that longer exposure to DMT may delay time to wheelchair in PPMS patients. Moreover, treating younger patients and reducing the delay to treatment initiation may improve the patients’ long-term disability outcomes. To optimize treatment decision-making in PPMS further profiling of the best candidates to treatment is needed.

Background

Historically, disease activity diminished during pregnancy in women with relapsing-remitting MS. Today, women with high disease activity are more likely to attempt pregnancy due to the disease control that new therapies offer. But disease activity during pregnancy in the modern day remains understudied.

Objectives

Describe disease activity in a modern pregnancy cohort, grouped by preconception disease-modifying therapy (DMT) class; determine the predictors of relapse during pregnancy.

Methods

Data were obtained from the MSBase Registry. Term/preterm pregnancies conceived from 2011-2019 were included. DMT were classed by low, moderate and high-efficacy. Annualized relapse rates (ARR) were calculated for each pregnancy trimester and 12 months either side. Predictors of relapse during pregnancy were determined using clustered logistic regression.

Results

We included 1640 pregnancies from 1452 women. DMT used in the year before conception were none (n=346), low (n=845), moderate (n=207) and high-efficacy (n=242). Most common DMT in each class was interferon-beta (n=597), fingolimod (n=147) and natalizumab (n=219) for low, moderate and high-efficacy respectively. Conception EDSS ≥2 was more common in higher efficacy DMT groups (high: 41.3%; moderate 28.5%; low 22.4%; none 20.2%). For low-efficacy and no DMT groups, ARR fell through pregnancy. ARR of the moderate-efficacy group increased in the 1^st pregnancy trimester (0.55 [95% CI 0.36-0.80] vs 0.14 [95% CI 0.10-0.21] on low-efficacy), then decreased to a trough in the third. Conversely, ARR steadily increased throughout pregnancy for those on high-efficacy DMT (3^rd trimester: 0.42 [95% CI 0.25-0.66] vs 0.12 [95% CI 0.07-0.19] on low-efficacy). Higher efficacy DMT groups were associated with higher ARR in the early postpartum period (high: 0.84 [95% CI 0.62-1.1]; moderate: 0.90 [95% CI 0.65-1.2]; low: 0.47 [95% CI 0.38-0.58]). Preconception use of high and moderate-efficacy DMT and higher preconception ARR were predictors of relapse in pregnancy. But, continuation of high-efficacy DMT into pregnancy was protective against relapse (odds ratio 0.80 [95% CI 0.68-0.94]). Age ≥35 years was associated with reduced odds of relapse.

Conclusions

Women with RRMS treated with moderate or high-efficacy DMT are at greater risk of relapse during pregnancy. Careful pregnancy management, and use of long-acting high-efficacy DMT preconception, or continuing natalizumab into pregnancy, may prevent relapse in pregnancy.

Background

Cognitive impairment is one of the most disabling symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS), affecting about 50% of patients.

Objectives

We sought to define homogeneous cognitive phenotypes in a large cohort of MS patients by using a data-driven approach, and to assess their distinctive clinical and MRI features.

Methods

A cohort of 1212 MS patients and 196 healthy controls (HC) from 8 Italian MS centers underwent cognitive evaluation with Rao’s Brief Repeatable Battery and Stroop Color Word Test. A subgroup (172 MS patients and 50 HC) also underwent a 3T MRI examination, including 3D T1-weighted and dual-echo sequences. Latent-profile analysis was used on cognitive tests’ z-scores for identifying cognitive phenotypes. Linear regression and mixed effects models were used to define the clinical and MRI features of each phenotype.

Results

Five cognitive phenotypes were identified, characterized by “preserved-cognition” (19%), “mild verbal memory/semantic fluency” impairment (30%), “mild-multi-domain” impairment (19%), “severe-attention/executive” impairment with mild impairment of other domains (14%), and “severe-multi-domain” impairment (18%). “Preserved-cognition” patients had shorter disease duration and lower Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score than all other groups, and mildly impaired phenotypes included patients with shorter disease duration and less likely progressive disease compared to severely impaired groups. However, the “preserved-cognition” group also included patients with progressive disease and high EDSS scores, and severely impaired phenotypes were also represented in early MS stages. Comparing each phenotype to “preserved-cognition” group, distinctive MRI features emerged: “mild verbal memory/semantic fluency” patients had reduced hippocampal volume (p=0.02), “mild-multi-domain” reduced cortical gray matter volume (p=0.04), “severe-attention/executive” higher lesion volume (p=0.04) and severe-multi-domain” extensive brain damage (p<0.01 for lesion, brain, gray matter and thalamic volumes).

Conclusions

We identified five cognitive phenotypes of MS patients, with distinctive MRI substrates. By defining homogenous and clinically meaningful groups, this characterization may be useful for future research on cognitive impairment in MS, and for defining personalized management approaches and rehabilitative strategies in clinical practice.

Background

Cognitive impairment (CI) affects nearly 30% of paediatric patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and has a negative impact on school performance and participation in social activities. This study is a re-appraisal of cognitive functioning and socio-professional attainment in adulthood in an Italian cohort of paediatric MS patients after 10 years from baseline neuropsychological assessment.

Objectives

To re-assess cognitive performance and its impact on socio-professional attainment in our cohort of paediatric MS patients after 10 years from baseline evaluation and to determine predictors of the individual outcomes.

Methods

Sixty-three paediatric patients were assessed at baseline and 48 followed-up after five years. To date, 31 out of these 48 patients (17 females, mean age 27.9±2.5 years, mean EDSS 1.7±1.6) were reassessed on an extensive neuropsychological battery and compared with a matched group of 31 healthy controls. CI was defined as the failure of > 2 tests. Socio-professional attainment was evaluated on the Work and Social Assessment Scale (WSAS). Predictors of CI and WSAS score were assessed through multivariable logistic and linear models.

Results

After a mean follow-up of 12.5±2.3 years, 15 (54%) subjects were classified as cognitively impaired. Patients with CI compared with those cognitively preserved at follow-up had higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score (1.9±1.4 vs 1.0±0.7; p = 0.046), lower baseline intelligence quotient (IQ) (86.2±23.8 vs 103.6±14.7; p = 0.025) and were less frequently treated with disease modifying therapy (DMT) at baseline [6 (35.3%) vs 11 (78.6%); p = 0.016]. In the regression model, CI after 10 years was related to lower IQ (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.99, p = 0. 027) and absence of DMT at baseline assessment (OR 17.78 95%; 1.72-183.65, p = 0.017).

Baseline predictors of worse socio-professional attainment on the WSAS in adulthood were CI (B=6.3, p=0.016), higher EDSS (B=2.2, p=0.023) and higher age at onset (B=0.6, p=0.041). As for 10-year correlates, only CI was associated to poor functional outcome (B=5.2, p=0.006).

Conclusions

Complete data collection is ongoing; available findings to date show that in paediatric onset subjects CI remains significant in adulthood, is related to lower cognitive reserve, higher levels of neurological impairment and delay in DMT initiation. Moreover, CI plays a key role in predicting the subject social performance and professional outcome. Early treatment and promotion of strategies aimed at enhancing cognitive reserve are recommended in paediatric patients with MS.

Background

SARS-COV-2 pandemic poses an imminent threat to humanity and in particular in those people suffering chronic diseases. Immune-mediated disease, as NMOSD and MOGAD, could be at a higher risk of severe forms of COVID-19 both for the disease itself and for immunosuppressive treatments.

Objectives

To evaluate the prevalence and severity of COVID-19 infection in the NMOSD/MOGAD population in Italy and evaluate possibily risk factors for disease outcomes.

Methods

The MS Study Group of the Italian Neurological Society has set up a proactive programme to provide information about COVID-19 in NMOSD/MOGAD patients, using a semistructured survey.

Results

569 NMOSD/MOGAD patients from 40 Italian MS Centres have been censored for COVID-19.

68% (387/569) of the patients were treated with rituximab, 16% (91/569) with azathioprine, 4.4% (25/569) with tocilizumab, 5.4% (31/569) with other therapies and 6.2% (35/569) were untreated or without information.

8/569 patients (1.4%) were diagnosed having confirmed or highly suspected COVID-19: positive rhino-pharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 were found in 4 out of 6 tested patients.

At the time of data collection, 6 patients recovered, 1 was still hospitalised and, unfortunately, 1 died. Hospitalisation was required for 3 patients.

5/8 (68%) patients were treated with rituximab. There was no evidence of any difference of such a percentage with the one of the overall population (OR=0.78, 95%CI=0.18-3.31, p=0.74).

COVID-19 infection was classified mild in 5, severe in 2 and critical in 1. The main experienced symptoms were fever, cough, fatigue and shortness of breath. 5/8 patients experienced CNS symptoms as headache (3), dizziness (1), anosmia (1) and delirium (1).

Conclusions

1) the prevalence of COVID-19 infection appears low in NMOSD/MOGAD patients (1.9%) with a mortality rate similar to that of the general italian population (12.5% vs 14.3%);

2) no other risk factors for severe course of COVID-19 than those already known emerge;

3) the baseline use of biologics, and in particular anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, is not associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 infection and apparently not with worse COVID-19 outcomes

Even if preliminary, these findings suggest a cautious optimism in the care of these autoimmune conditions during the pandemic phase.

The MS Study Group: M Inglese, A Di Sapio, D Vecchio, P Cavalla, A Protti, M Radaelli, S Malagu', A Gajofatto, D Landi, G Marfia, MP Amato, A Lugaresi, C Scandellari, S Bonavita, P Perini, F Rinaldi, D Centonze, S Di Lemme, P Immovilli, U Aguglia, M Zaffaroni, S Montepietra, L Moiola, M Filippi, MT Ferro', M Salvetti, MC Buscarinu, F Granella, M Dotta, M Mirabella, M Lucchini, G De Luca, C Tortorella, C Gasperini, G Maniscalco, D Ferraro, E Cocco, R Bergamaschi, M Ulivelli, P Valentino, M Falcini, L Brambilla, G Lus, M De Riz, M Trojano, P Ragonese, A Bertolotto

Background

Our current understanding of demographic and clinical modifiers of the effectiveness of multiple sclerosis (MS) therapies is limited.

Objectives

To assess whether patients’ response to disease modifying therapies (DMT) in MS varies by disease activity (annualised relapse rate, presence of new MRI lesions), disability, age, MS duration or disease phenotype.

Methods

Using the international MSBase registry, we selected patients with MS followed for ≥1 year, with ≥3 visits, ≥1 visit per year. Marginal structural models (MSMs) were used to compare the hazard ratios (HR) of 6-month confirmed worsening and improvement of disability (EDSS), and the incidence of relapses between treated and untreated periods. MSMs were continuously re-adjusted for patient age, sex, pregnancy, date, time from first symptom, prior relapse history, disability and MRI activity.

Results

Among 23 687 patients with relapsing MS, those on DMT experienced 20% greater chance of disability improvement [HR 1.20 (95% CI 1.0-1.5)], 47% lower risk of disability worsening [HR 0.53 (0.39-0.71)] and 51% reduction in relapses [HR 0.49 (0.43-0.55)]. The effect of DMT on relapses and EDSS worsening was attenuated with longer MS duration and higher prior relapse rate. The effect of DMT on EDSS improvement and relapses was more evident in low EDSS categories. DMT was associated with 51% EDSS improvement in patients without new MRI lesions [HR 1.51 (1.00-2.28)] compared to 4% in those with MRI activity [HR 1.04 (0.88-1.24)]. Among 26329 participants with relapsing or progressive MS, DMT was associated with 25% reduction in EDSS worsening and 42% reduction in relapses in patients with relapsing MS [HR 0.75 (0.65-0.86) and HR 0.58 (CI 0.54-62), respectively], while evidence for such beneficial effects of treatment in patients with progressive MS was not found [HR 1.11 (0.91-1.46) and HR 1.16 (0.91-1.46), respectively].

Conclusions

DMTs are associated with reduction in relapse frequency, progression of disability, and increased chance of recovery from disability. In general, the effectiveness of DMTs was most pronounced in subgroups with shorter MS duration, lower EDSS, lower relapse rate and relapsing MS phenotype.

Background

Early treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) has been shown to provide significant long-term benefits in terms of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score versus delayed treatment (patients switching from placebo to active treatment). ENSEMBLE (NCT03085810) is a Phase IIIb study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of ocrelizumab (OCR) in patients with early-stage relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Assessments of effectiveness in ENSEMBLE include composite endpoint measures, e.g. the proportion of patients with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA).

Objectives

To report ENSEMBLE 1-year interim NEDA rates.

Methods

Treatment-naive patients with a diagnosis of early-stage RRMS (age, 18–55 years inclusive; EDSS score ≤3.5) per 2010 revised McDonald criteria and a disease duration from the first documented clinical attack consistent with MS disease of ≤3 years and ≥1 clinically reported relapse or ≥1 sign of MRI activity within 12 months of enrollment were included. Patients received OCR 600 mg every 24 weeks (first dose 2×300 mg separated by 14 days) throughout the 192-week (4-year) treatment period (max 8 doses). Clinical assessments will be conducted every 24 weeks. NEDA is defined as absence of: protocol-defined relapses (PDRs), 24-week confirmed disability progression (24W-CDP), T1-weighted contrast-enhancing (CEL) and new/enlarging T2-weighted (T2w) lesions. The effects of OCR are not immediate. MRI measures were re-baselined at Week 8 (prespecified) so that the calculation of NEDA would reflect a more accurate treatment effect.

Results

A total of 678 patients (female, 64.6%) were enrolled (74.6% of patients based on the presence of reasons of both MS relapse and MRI activity) and analyzed. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics reflected a population with early-stage disease (mean [SD]: age, 32.4 [9.1] years; baseline EDSS, 1.71 [0.95]; time since RRMS diagnosis, 0.36 [0.40] years; time since MS symptom onset, 1.10 [0.84] years). At Week 48 most patients (84.8% [n/N=545/643]) reached NEDA. Most patients were free of PDR (98.1%), 24W-CDP (94.1%), CEL (94.2%; re-baselined) and new/enlarging T2w (95.2%; re-baselined) lesions. NEDA calculated without MRI re-baselining was achieved by 62.1% of patients (n/N=404/651). Safety results were consistent with prior studies.

Conclusions

In ENSEMBLE, the Year 1 NEDA rate with MRI re-baselining was high (84.8%) in patients with early-stage disease. No new safety signals were observed.

Background

The advent of oral first-line disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) has expanded considerably the therapeutic landscape. However, here is an important need to gather real-world evidence data regarding long-term treatment effectiveness and safety in comparison to the old first-line injectables DMTs.

Objectives

To compare old injectable and oral first line DMTs for time to first relapse, time to confirmed disability progression (CDP), and time to discontinuation in a cohort of RRMS patients extracted from the Italian MS Registry.

Methods

Multicentre, observational, retrospectively acquired and propensity-adjusted cohort study of RRMS-naïve patients in the Italian MS Register starting injective or oral first line DMTs between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2017 to evaluate their impact on disability outcomes in patients. Enrolled patients were divided into two groups: injectable group (IG) and oral group (OG).

Results

From a cohort of 11,416 patients, 4,602 were enrolled (3,919 on IG and 683 on OG). IG had higher rate of women (67.3% vs 63.4%, p<.05) and a lower mean age (36.1±10.9 vs 38.9±11.8, p<.001). For the event time to first relapse, Cox models after PS adjustment revealed a lower risk for OG patients (HR 0.58 CI95% 0.47-0.70, p<0.001). About the risk of CDP, no differences were found in the two groups (HR 1.14 CI95% 0.88-1.48, p=0.306). About the risk of DMT discontinuation, OG patients showed lower risk (HR 0.70 CI95% 0.57-0.86 p=0.001) than IG patients.

Conclusions

Real-world data from the Italian MS registry suggest that first line oral DMTs are associated to lower risks of experiencing a new relapse and of therapy discontinuation in comparison to injectable DMTs.

Background

Polypharmacy adds many variables in the relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) therapeutic algorithms. The choice of first Disease-Modifying Therapy (DMT) should also take into account the presence of concomitant medical illnesses and the use of other medications that can expose patients to adverse drug reactions, and drug-drug or drug-disease interactions.

Objectives

To examine the frequency of polypharmacy in a large cohort of patients at the time of RRMS diagnosis and to explore its effects on disease course after three years from the beginning of the first DMT assessed by the score no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3).

Methods

We enrolled RRMS patients starting their first DMT between January 1^st, 2013 and December 31^st, 2015. According to the number of medicines prescribed (except DMTs) we divided patients in three groups: no-Poly-RRMS, minor-Poly-RRMS (from one to three medications) and major Poly-RRMS (>3 medications).

Results

392 RRMS patients were enrolled (mean age 41.1). Minor-Poly-RRMS were 61 (15.6%) and major-Poly-RRMS were 112 (28.6%). Minor and major-poly-RRMS were older (p=0.00) and with higher median Body Mass Index (BMI)(p=0.00) than no-poly-RRMS patients.

At multivariate regression analysis, higher age at onset was associated with minor and major-poly-RRMS (OR 1.050, CI 1.0-1-2, p=.015 and OR 1.063, CI 1.0-1.1, respectively). BMI was associated with major poly-RRMS (OR 1.186, CI 1.18-1.29, p=.000). Polypharmacy was not associated with disease activity after three years.

Conclusions

In our cohort of newly diagnosed RRMS, polypharmacy was associated with older age and higher BMI at the time of diagnosis. Polypharmacy represents an emerging challenge in medical management in the worldwide population, especially in the elderly.

Background

Cardiovascular comorbidities are one of the most leading causes of disability in the general population, and hypertension is one comorbid condi­tion that is prevalent and impactful among patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Furthermore, sedentary behavior has been associated with putative outcomes of disability status in patients with MS.

Objectives

The aim of the study is the association between cardiovascular risk (measured with Framingham risk score (FRS)), sedentary behaviors (measured with Godin Leisure-Time Excercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ)) and disease activity in MS patients.

Methods

Patients with Relapsing Remitting MS (RRMS) consecutively admitted to the MS center of Catania from October 2019 to February 2020 were enrolled. According to the reason of access to the MS center, patients were divided in: active patients (patients with clinical relapses and/or radiological activity) and non-active patients (scheduled visit). The assessment included collection of demographical and clinical outcomes. To analyse any association between disease activity and FRS and GLTEQ a binary logistic regression model was built.

Results

432 patients were enrolled. Out of them, 334 (77.8%) were active and 98 (22.2%) were non active. Active patients were younger, with higher number of relapses in the year before enrolment and higher level of disability (p<.05 for all). About FRS, no differences were found between the two groups in low (54.3% vs 54.1), intermediate (34% vs 34.2%) and high risk (11% vs 11.7%) rates. About GLTEQ, no differences were found between the two groups in rates of full active (16% vs 19.5%), sufficiently active (53.2% vs 57.7%) and inactive (30.9% vs 22.8%) patients.

At logistic regression model, there was a correlation between a high GLTEQ value and disease activity (ExpB 2.462, IC 1.000-6.094, p = .049). No correlations were found with other clinical variables or with FRS.

Conclusions

Our study revealed that sedentary behaviors should be associated with higher level of disease activity. Cardiovascular comorbidities deserve attention in all MS cohort. Further studies are needed.

Background

No clear metrics for sensitive and reliable identification of the transition from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) to secondary progressive (SP)MS are available.

Objectives

To compare diagnostic performances of two different data-driven Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis definitions.

Methods

patient with RRMS with a follow-up ≥5 years, with a current age ≥18 years, and with ≥3 EDSS scores recorded were selected from the Italian MS Registry. Annual incidence of SPMS conversion was reported as number of patients converting to SP every 100 patients/year. Three different SPMS definitions have been used. Data-driven definitions based on the Lorscheider’s algorithm (LA) and on the EXPAND trial inclusion criteria were validated, using the neurologist’s definition as gold standard, in terms of calibration, discrimination and goodness of fit by calculating: sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV), the Akaike information criterion (AIC), the Area Under the Curve (AUC). The overall calibration of the data-driven definitions was evaluated by the Calibration Slope test.

Results

a cohort of 10,240 RRMS patients was extracted from the Italian MS Registry. According to the neurologist judgment, 880 (8.59%) patients were classified as SPMS in the dataset. By applying the LA and the EXPAND definition, 1,806 (17.64%) and 1,134 (11.07%) patients, respectively, were classified as SPMS. The annual rate of SP conversion during the follow-up was 0.74 every 100 patients/year based on the neurologist’s definition, 1.57 every 100 patients/year using the LA and 0.94 every 100 patients/year applying the EXPAND definition. Both the data-driven definitions were well calibrated, with a p-value of the Calibration Slope test higher than 0.05 (LA=0.55; EXPAND definition=0.57). The AIC (LA=4301; EXPAND definition=5510) and the R-Square (LA=0.15 vs EXPAND definition=0.05), were in favor of the LA. The LA showed a greater discrimination power (AUC: 0.83 vs 0.65) and a higher sensitivity (77.1% vs 38.0%) in comparison to the EXPAND definition. Both definitions showed similar specificity (88.0% vs 91.5%). The PPV and the NPV were both higher using the LA than those obtained by the EXPAND definition (37.5% vs 29.5%; 97.6% vs 94.0%, respectively).

Conclusions

An accurate definition of SP transition is needed for a timely and efficacious treatment of SPMS patients. Real-world data from the Italian MS Registry suggests that data-driven definitions had a greater ability to capture SP transition than neurologist’s definition and that the global accuracy of LA seems to be higher than a definition based on the EXPAND trial inclusion criteria.

Background

Multiple sclerosis (MS) peak prevalence has shifted towards older age groups owing to declining premature mortality rates, yet the disease course of MS in older patients is poorly understood in terms of modern clinical practice. Thus, we re-analysed data from BEACON (BEtaferon prospective study on Adherence, COping and Nurse support), an international, non-interventional, prospective study of patients with MS and initiating interferon beta-1b (Betaferon) treatment within 6 months before study entry.

Objectives

To assess patient characteristics and treatment response in the age ranges of 41–50 and >50 years, to better define MS disease course and treatment outcomes in older patients.

Methods

The BEACON study observational period lasted 2 years, with visits/assessments every 6 months. Assessments included disease history and course, annualized relapse rate (ARR), Expanded Disability Scale Score (EDSS), treatment adherence, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and adverse events.

Results

Intention-to-treat (ITT) patients (any post-baseline visit) aged 41–50 (n=327) and >50 years (n=154), had mean (SD) ages at baseline of 45.1 (2.8) and 56.2 (4.2) years, respectively, and duration of MS since onset of symptoms of 3.9 (5.2) and 5.9 (7.1) years, respectively. The proportion of patients with confirmed relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS) diagnoses at baseline was similar for those aged 41–50 years (96.3 and 3.7%) and >50 years (94.9 and 5.1%), respectively. The ARR during the 2 years before study start was 0.93 (0.48) vs 0.86 (0.54) for the 41–50 and >50 years groups, respectively, and during the study period the ARR was 0.20 (1.09) vs 0.07 (0.37), respectively. At last visit, mean (SD) HADS anxiety scores were 8.0 (4.5) and 7.5 (4.2) in the 41–50 and >50 years age groups, respectively, and likewise HADS depression scores were 6.4 (4.0) and 7.0 (4.1), respectively. The proportion with any adverse events and any serious adverse events was 15.0 and 4.2% in the 41–50 years group and 19.6 and 1.3% in the >50 years group, respectively.

Conclusions

MS disease activity was similar at baseline in the two age groups. Decreases in ARR for both age groups during the study compared favorably with ARR in the 2 prior years. Interferon beta-1b appears to be effective and well tolerated in middle age and older patients with MS above 40 and above 50 years.

Background

Some cohort studies have reported similar onset age and disability accrual in primary and secondary progressive MS (PPMS, SPMS); others have reported later onset and faster disability accrual in SPMS. Comparisons are complicated by differences in baseline disability and exposure to disease-modifying therapies (DMT), and by lack of a standardized definition of SPMS.

Objectives

We compared hazards of disability accrual in PPMS and SPMS patients from the MSBase cohort using multivariable Cox models, applying validated diagnostic criteria for SPMS (Lorscheider et al., Brain 2016).

Methods

Inclusion required adult-onset progressive MS; ≥ 3 recorded Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores; and, for SPMS, initial records with EDSS ≤ 3 to allow objective identification of SPMS conversion. Phenotypes were subgrouped as active (PPMS-A, SPMS-A) if ≥ 1 progressive-phase relapse was recorded, and inactive (PPMS-N, SPMS-N) otherwise. Disability accrual was defined by sustained EDSS increases confirmed over ≥ 6 months. Hazard ratios (HR) for disability accrual were obtained using Andersen-Gill Cox models, adjusted for sex and time-varying age, disability, visit frequency, and proportion of time on DMT or immunosuppressive therapy. Sensitivity analyses were performed using (1) PPMS and SPMS diagnosed since 1995, and (2) physician-diagnosed SPMS. Cumulative probability of reaching EDSS ≥ 7 (wheelchair required) was assessed (Kaplan-Meier).

Results

5461 patients were included (1257 PPMS-N; 1308 PPMS-A; 1731 SPMS-N; 1165 SPMS-A). Age at progression onset was older in SPMS than PPMS (47.2 ± 10.2, vs. 41.5 ± 10.7 [mean ± SD]), and in the inactive subgroups of each phenotype. Hazard of disability accrual was decreased in SPMS relative to PPMS (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.78–0.92); decreased by proportion of time on DMT (HR 0.99 per 10% increment; 0.98–0.99); and higher in males (1.18; 1.12–1.25). Relative to PPMS-N, hazard was decreased in SPMS-A (0.79; 0.71–0.87) but similar for PPMS-A (1.01; 0.93–1.10) and SPMS-N (0.94; 0.85–1.05). Sensitivity analyses corroborated these results. However, patients with SPMS-A reached EDSS ≥ 7 at younger ages (cumulative probability 30% by 57, vs. 64–66 for SPMS-N, PPMS-A, PPMS-N).

Conclusions

Progressive phase onset is later in SPMS than PPMS. Hazard of disability accrual during the progressive phase is lower in SPMS than PPMS. However, patients with SPMS-A reach wheelchair requirement younger than other progressive phenotypes, reflecting earlier progression onset versus SPMS-N, and greater disability at onset versus PPMS

Background

In secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS), reduction in the rates of disability accrual after starting disease modifying therapy (DMT) has largely been limited to patients with ongoing inflammatory activity. A delayed treatment effect, termed therapeutic lag, may obscure therapeutic benefits in SPMS.

Objectives

To compare the effect of high and low efficacy DMT on disability outcomes in patients with recently active and inactive SPMS after accounting for therapeutic lag.

Methods

Using data from MSBase, a multinational MS registry, and OFSEP, the French MS registry, we identified patients with SPMS as per a previously validated objective definition. We identified patients treated with high- (natalizumab, alemtuzumab, mitoxantrone, ocrelizumab, rituximab, cladribine, fingolimod) or low-efficacy (interferons, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide) DMT after SPMS onset. Based on our previous work, an individualised estimate of duration of therapeutic lag was calculated for each patient. Only events that occurred after the estimated therapeutic lag period were included in the analysis. Propensity score matching was used to select groups with comparable baseline characteristics. Disability and relapse outcomes were compared in paired, pairwise-censored analyses adjusted for visit density.

Results

Of 7359 patients with SPMS, 1000 patients fulfilled the criteria for study inclusion (510 active SPMS, 490 inactive SPMS). For the relapse outcomes, patients with active SPMS treated with high-efficacy DMTs experienced lower probabilities of relapses than low-efficacy DMTs (hazard ratio [HR] 0.7 [95%CI 0.5-0.9], p=0.006). Patients with inactive SPMS had similar probabilities of relapses in the high and low efficacy DMT groups (0.8 [0.6-1.2], p=0.39). No difference in the risk of 6-month sustained disability accumulation, or proportion of patients reaching EDSS>=7, was observed between groups when accounting for therapeutic lag.

Conclusions

The risk of disability accumulation in SPMS seems to be comparable in patients treated with high- and low- efficacy DMT. High efficacy DMT is superior to low efficacy therapy in reducing relapse activity in patients with active SPMS, but not those with inactive SPMS. Pre-treatment inflammatory activity, clinical or radiological, is a treatable target in SPMS which may benefit from higher-efficacy anti-inflammatory therapies.

Background

Ocrelizumab (OCR) is a humanised anti-CD20⁺ monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS), and relapsing forms of MS, including both relapsing-remitting (RRMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS) with relapses.

Objectives

In a real-world setting, to describe 1) baseline characteristics of patients with MS treated with OCR, 2) treatment pathway across lines of therapy up to initiation of OCR, and 3) initial clinical experience in patients with ≥6 months follow-up data from OCR initiation.

Methods

Secondary data analysis using MSBase Registry data including patients with a confirmed diagnosis of MS and started OCR therapy within 3 months prior to or at time of MSBase eligible/initial visit. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze baseline patient characteristics' recorded within 3 months of OCR initiation, including demographics, disease course and duration, prior disease modifying therapies (DMT), and EDSS. Occurrence of relapse was analyzed in patients with ≥6 months follow-up data from OCR initiation.

Results

As of 4^th June 2020, MSBase included 2531 patients newly treated with OCR, of whom 1679 had an EDSS evaluation within 3 months of OCR start. There were 1185 patients with RRMS, 236 with SPMS, and 183 with PPMS. Median age at OCR initiation was 41.9 years, 49.5 years, to 50.1 years in RRMS, SPMS, and PPMS, respectively. Mean disease duration from symptom onset up to OCR initiation was longer in SPMS (19.7 years) than in RRMS (10.6 years) and PPMS (9.7 years). OCR was initiated as first line therapy in 17.5%, 5.5%, and 54.2% of RRMS, SPMS, and PPMS patients respectively. Most frequent previous DMT’s in RRMS were fingolimod (25.7%) and natalizumab (23.5%). 693 patients with RRMS had ≥6 months follow-up during OCR exposure. Of these, 643 remained relapse free (93%; 95% CI 86.0, 100.0) over a mean OCR exposure of 1.23 years. The annualized relapse rate (ARR) was 0.08 (95% CI 0.06-0.10), compared to an ARR of 0.85 in the 24 months pre-OCR start. In the overall cohort, treatment persistence at 12 and 24 months was 98.4% (95% CI: 97.3-9.1%) and 92.5% (95%CI 89-95%), respectively.

Conclusions

This study characterizes an international population of patients with RRMS, PPMS, and SPMS newly treated with OCR in a real-world clinical setting. First-line use was uncommon in RRMS and SPMS. During OCR treatment, ARR was below 0.1, and OCR discontinuations were very rare.

Background

A wash-out duration lasting >1–2 months between the majority of sequential disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is associated with an increased risk of disease reactivation in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients.

Fingolimod (FTY) induces sequestration of lymphocytes in secondary lymphoid organs and the average lymphocyte recovery following discontinuation takes 1-2 months. It has been hypothesized that the therapeutic effects of subsequent cell-depleting agents may be compromised if lymphocyte recovery is still incomplete and that shorter wash-out periods do not affect the disease reactivation risk.

Objectives

To assess the risk of relapses following FTY discontinuation and the initiation of a B/T cell-depleting agent initiation in relation to the duration of wash-out between the drugs using data from the Italian MS Registry.

Methods

Patients who initiated alemtuzumab, rituximab, ocrelizumab or cladribine within six months of FTY discontinuation, and with a follow-up of at least six months, or until a relapse occurred, were included in the study. The risk of relapses was assessed in relation to different wash-out durations (<6, 6-11, 12-17 and >/=18 weeks) using a Poisson regression analysis (and reported as incidence rate ratio - IRR) and a Cox proportional hazards model including age, disease duration, relapses during FTY treatment, EDSS and reason for FTY discontinuation as covariates.

Results

Inclusion criteria were met by 329 patients (226F, 103M; mean age 41±10 years). Following a median wash-out period of 11 weeks [IQR: 6-16], 175 patients started alemtuzumab, 69 rituximab, 68 ocrelizumab and 17 cladribine. Ninety patients relapsed during the wash-out period and 72 during the subsequent cell-depleting therapy. During the cell-depleting treatment, IRR for a relapse was significantly greater in patients with a washout-period of 12-17 (IRR (95%CI): 2.4 (1,1-5,5); p=0.037) and >/=18 weeks (6.0 (2.8-12.7); p<0.001) compared to the reference period (<6 weeks).

The multivariable Cox analysis showed that the time to a relapse was significantly influenced by the occurrence of relapses during FTY treatment (HR (95%CI): 1.4 (1.2-1.7); p<0.001). Moreover, wash-out durations of 6-11, 12-17 and >/=18 weeks were associated with a higher risk of a relapse in comparison to wash-out durations shorter than 6 weeks (3.8 (1.1-13.2); p=0.037; 6.0 (1.7-21.9); p=0.006; 16.3 (4.8-56.3); p<0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

The risk of relapses during a cell-depleting therapy following a sequestering agent, namely FTY, increases progressively with the duration of wash-out, underlining the need of a short wash-out period also in this type of treatment sequence.

Background

Disease activity has been investigated in pregnant women with RRMS treated with low-efficacy or no therapy. How newer, more efficacious therapies affect relapse and disability progression risk after pregnancy remains understudied.

Objectives

To describe disease activity in a modern pregnancy cohort contrasted with historical cohorts. To determine the predictors of postpartum relapse and the predictors of six-month confirmed disability progression events in a contemporary pregnancy cohort.

Methods

Data were obtained from the MSBase Registry. Term/preterm pregnancies conceived from 2011-2019 (modern cohort) were compared with those conceived between 2005-2010 and pre-2005. Annualised relapse rates (ARR) were calculated for each pregnancy trimester and 12 months either side. Predictors of time-to-relapse postpartum (1^st 3 months) and time to 6-month confirmed disability progression event were determined with clustered Cox regression analyses. Breastfeeding duration and time to DMT reinitiation were modelled as time-varying covariates.

Results

We included 1640 pregnancies from 1452 women (modern cohort). Disease-modifying therapy (DMT) used in the year before conception included interferon-beta (n=597), natalizumab (n=219) and fingolimod (n=147). Continuation of DMT up to conception increased over time (31% pre-2005 vs 54% modern cohort). Preconception ARR decreased across epochs (pre-2005: 0·58 [95% CI 0·49-0·70]; 2005-2010: 0·40 [95% CI 0·36-0·45]; modern: 0·29 [95% CI 0·27-0·32]). In all epochs, ARR decreased during pregnancy to reach similar troughs in the 3^rd trimester, and rebounded in the 1^st 3-months postpartum. Preconception use of high-efficacy DMT predicted early postpartum relapse (hazard ratio (HR) 2.1 [1.4-3.1]); although those on no DMT were also at risk of postpartum relapse, relative to women on low-efficacy DMT (HR 2.7 [1.2-5.9]). Conception EDSS ≥2, higher preconception and in-pregnancy ARR were also risk factors. DMT reinitiation, particularly of high-efficacy DMT (HR 0.17 [0.07-0.38]), was protective against postpartum relapse. Women who breastfed were less likely to relapse (HR 0.63 [0.42-0.94]). 4.5% of modern pregnancies had confirmed disability progression after delivery. This was predicted by higher pregnancy and postpartum ARR, with postpartum ARR remaining independently predictive in multivariable analysis (HR 1.5 [1.2-2.0]).

Conclusions

The early postpartum period remains a period of vulnerability for disease rebound in women with MS in the modern era. Early DMT reinitiation, particularly with high-efficacy treatment, is protective against postpartum relapse. Confirmed disability progression events after pregnnacy are uncommon in the modern era. Relapse activity is the key driver of these events.

Background

Multiple sclerosis (MS) peak prevalence has shifted towards older age groups owing to declining premature mortality rates, yet the disease course of MS in older patients is poorly understood in terms of modern clinical practice. Thus, we re-analysed data from BEACON (BEtaferon prospective study on Adherence, COping and Nurse support), an international, non-interventional, prospective study of patients with MS and initiating interferon beta-1b (Betaferon) treatment within 6 months before study entry.

Objectives

To assess patient characteristics and treatment response in the age ranges of 41–50 and >50 years, to better define MS disease course and treatment outcomes in older patients.

Methods

The BEACON study observational period lasted 2 years, with visits/assessments every 6 months. Assessments included disease history and course, annualized relapse rate (ARR), Expanded Disability Scale Score (EDSS), treatment adherence, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and adverse events.

Results

Intention-to-treat (ITT) patients (any post-baseline visit) aged 41–50 (n=327) and >50 years (n=154), had mean (SD) ages at baseline of 45.1 (2.8) and 56.2 (4.2) years, respectively, and duration of MS since onset of symptoms of 3.9 (5.2) and 5.9 (7.1) years, respectively. The proportion of patients with confirmed relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS) diagnoses at baseline was similar for those aged 41–50 years (96.3 and 3.7%) and >50 years (94.9 and 5.1%), respectively. The ARR during the 2 years before study start was 0.93 (0.48) vs 0.86 (0.54) for the 41–50 and >50 years groups, respectively, and during the study period the ARR was 0.20 (1.09) vs 0.07 (0.37), respectively. At last visit, mean (SD) HADS anxiety scores were 8.0 (4.5) and 7.5 (4.2) in the 41–50 and >50 years age groups, respectively, and likewise HADS depression scores were 6.4 (4.0) and 7.0 (4.1), respectively. The proportion with any adverse events and any serious adverse events was 15.0 and 4.2% in the 41–50 years group and 19.6 and 1.3% in the >50 years group, respectively.

Conclusions

MS disease activity was similar at baseline in the two age groups. Decreases in ARR for both age groups during the study compared favorably with ARR in the 2 prior years. Interferon beta-1b appears to be effective and well tolerated in middle age and older patients with MS above 40 and above 50 years.