M. Bach Cuadra

Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne Department of Radiology

Author Of 3 Presentations

Machine Learning/Network Science Poster Presentation

P0017 - Translating MPRAGE to MP2RAGE improves the automatic tissue and lesion segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis patients (ID 766)

Speakers
Presentation Number
P0017
Presentation Topic
Machine Learning/Network Science

Abstract

Background

Compared to the conventional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (MPRAGE) MRI, magnetization prepared 2 rapid acquisition gradient echoes (MP2RAGE) (Marques, J. P., 2010) shows a higher brain tissue and lesion contrast in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. This specialized sequence is, however, mainly limited to research settings and not widely acquired in clinical routine.

Objectives

To synthesize realistic-looking MP2RAGE images from MPRAGE acquisitions via generative adversarial network (GAN) and verify if these improve the performance of automatic MS lesion and brain tissue segmentation tools.

Methods

We propose a GAN inspired by the pix2pix framework (Isola, P., 2018) which takes as input 2D slices of 3D MPRAGE images and generates a synthetic MP2RAGE (synMP2RAGE). Differently from pix2pix, the generator of the GAN combines three loss functions: a pixel-wise L1 loss, an adversarial loss, and a perceptual loss. Our framework is trained on 12 healthy controls and 8 MS patients and tested on 36 MS patients, for which an expert manually delineated cortical and white matter lesions. Imaging was performed with a 3T MRI scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with a 1x1x1.2 mm resolution. Evaluation is performed with reference-based metrics and through automatic segmentation of MS lesions (La Rosa, F., 2020) and brain tissue (Avants, B.B., 2011).

Results

Considering as reference the acquired MP2RAGE, synMP2RAGE achieves a peak signal-to-noise ratio of 31.39, normalized root mean square error of 0.13, and structural similarity index of 0.98, overperforming the MPRAGE (29.49, 0.17, 0.97, respectively) for all metrics. Compared to the initial MPRAGE it also significantly improves the lesion and tissue segmentation masks in terms of the Dice coefficient and volume difference (p-values < 0.001). On the contrary, no significant differences between the real and synMP2RAGE are found in the patient-wise comparison of the lesions’ segmentation (p-values > 0.05), whereas they are significant between MPRAGE and MP2RAGE (p-value < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our proposed framework successfully translates MPRAGE to MP2RAGE, synthesizing realistic-looking images which improve the performance of automatic segmentation tools tested on MS patients. In accordance with previous claims (Finck, T., 2020), these results confirm that GANs can be helpful in the automatic analysis of MRI images.

Collapse
Imaging Poster Presentation

P0534 - Advanced magnetic resonance imaging for myelin and axonal density in MS: correlation with clinical disability and serum neurofilament levels (ID 1781)

Abstract

Background

Myelin water imaging (MWI) and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) provide sensitive surrogate markers of myelin and axonal content in lesions and normal-appearing tissue. However, to date, there is scarce information about the relationship of these measures with (i) disability; and (ii) the axonal damage specific biomarker serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL).

Objectives

To explore the correlation of MWI and NODDI measures in MS lesions and in normal-appearing (NA) brain tissue with disability and sNfL.

Methods

Ninety-one MS patients (62 relapsing-remitting MS-RRMS and 29 progressive MS-PMS) underwent MWI and NODDI. Mean myelin water fraction (MWF) and neurite density index (NDI) were extracted in white matter lesions (WMLs), cortical lesions (CLs), NA white matter (NAWM) and cortical NA gray matter (CNAGM). For sNfL, a logarithmic transformation was applied to comply with normality assumption. Correlation studies between MRI measures, sNfL and EDSS were performed using linear models, with age and gender as covariates. The models were performed for the whole sample and for patients with clinical deficits only (EDSS >1).

Results

MWF and NDI did not correlate with EDSS when the entire cohort was considered (P>0.05). However, for those patients with clinical deficits (EDSS> 1), NDI in WMLs was associated with EDSS (NDI: P<0.01, beta=-10.00; N=74). We also found that MWF and NDI in WMLs were related to sNfL (MWF: P<0.01, beta=0.13; NDI: P<0.01, beta=-3.60). Again, this correlation was stronger in patients with EDSS>1 (MWF: P<0.01, beta=0.13; NDI: P <0.01, beta=-3.60).

Conclusions

Imaging surrogate markers of myelin and axon pathology in WML – and not in CLs and NA tissues - are correlated with disability and sNfL. Interestingly, associations between those imaging markers and disability/sNFL were more evident in patients with clinical deficits as compared to those without neurological deficits.

Collapse
Imaging Poster Presentation

P0545 - Automatic MS lesions segmentation using LeMan-PV as a clinical decision-support tool: a longitudinal analysis (ID 1590)

Abstract

Background

LeMan-PV is a prototype that performs cross-sectional and longitudinal detection of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) lesions, which has been validated on conventional (cMRI) and advanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3T (Fartaria et al. 2019). Since this software provides a report that is available shortly after image acquisition, it may be ideal as clinical decision-support tool.

Objectives

To assess LeMan-PV as clinical decision-support tool in a monocentric real-world cMRI dataset from the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Cohort.

Methods

262 MS patients underwent cMRI at Basel University Hospital in a mean of 3.5 follow-up sessions, with an average of 399 days between two consecutive sessions. cMRI sequences were acquired at 1.5T and 3T in 725 and 195 sessions, respectively. Cross-sectional and longitudinal MS lesions segmentation (i.e. identification of new and enlarging lesions - NLs, ELs) was performed using the LeMAN-PV prototype software. An expert neuroradiologist performed a radiological reading of the number of NLs and ELs in the most recent acquisition by comparing it to the previous one (ground truth, GT), considering only lesions with a diameter larger than 3 mm. The minimum volume thresholds to identify an NL and an EL were chosen by minimizing the patient-wise error between the automated count and the expert ground truth. Two scenarios were evaluated by first assuming disease activity if one or more EL were present, and second by considering activity if NL were present in the new acquisition.

Results

The volume thresholds chosen were 11 and 12 mm3 for ELs and NLs, respectively. For those, LeMan-PV detected 11% more of both ELs and NLs than the neuroradiologist. In the patient-wise evaluation of cases with both sessions acquired at 1.5T (70%), LeMan-PV showed sensitivities of 93% and 78% and specificities of 62% and 43% when evaluating ELs and NLs. For the 3T pairs of sessions (8%), values were 68% and 72% for ELs and 73% and 68% for NLs. Finally, for cases with a first acquisition at 1.5T and a second at 3T (22%), values were 76% and 73% for ELs and 71% and 65% for NLs.

Conclusions

The count of new and enlarging MS lesions using LeMan-PV were close to the one performed by an expert neuroradiologist; the software performed better when assessing disease activity via detection of enlarging lesions rather than by identifying new lesions. More 3T data is being currently collected at 3T to provide a size-matched inter-scanner comparison.

Collapse