Clifford R. Jack, United States of America

Mayo Clinic Neuroradiology
The research group of Clifford R. Jack Jr., M.D., is engaged in brain imaging research in cognitive aging and Alzheimer's disease and related disorders. The group develops image-processing algorithms for quantitatively measuring the information obtained from brain imaging. Specific goals are to understand how various imaging measures relate to neuropathology, cognitive, behavior and specific phenotypic abnormalities. All modern brain imaging modalities (amyloid PET, FDG PET, tau PET, anatomic MRI, diffusion imaging, perfusion imaging, task free functional MRI, and quantitative susceptibility mapping) are used along with clinical, psychometric, genetic and neuropathologic information. The group also serves as the MR center for large multi-site observational and interventional studies including ADNI, DIAN, ARIC, A4, A345, SCAN and the Jackson Heart Study.

Presenter of 3 Presentations

THE FUTURE OF IMAGING AND BIOFLUID ALZHEIMER’S BIOMARKERS

Session Type
SYMPOSIUM
Date
10.03.2021, Wednesday
Session Time
10:00 - 12:00
Room
On Demand Symposia A
Lecture Time
10:00 - 10:15
Session Icon
On-Demand

Abstract

Abstract Body

Aims: In 2018 a workgroup commissioned by the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association (NIA-AA) published a research framework in which Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is defined by the underlying pathologic processes rather than by the presence of an etiologically non-specific syndrome or syndromes. This shifts the definition of AD from a syndromal to a biological construct.

Methods: The research framework addresses both diagnosis (definition) and staging of AD. Biomarker and cognitive staging are performed independently from each other. AD can be documented by post-mortem examination or in vivo by biomarkers. Biomarkers are grouped into those of β-amyloid deposition, pathologic tau, and neurodegeneration (AT(N). Both imaging and biofluid (CSF and plasma) biomarkers exist within each AT(N) group.

Results: Since publication of the research framework, significant advances have occurred in development of plasma AT(N) biomarkers. As a results widespread application of a biological definition of AD and AT(N) biomarker phenotyping now seem possible. This has significant implications for design of clinical trials, observational research and clinical care.

Conclusions: Many unanswered questions exist concerning the appropriate roles and the interplay between traditional expensive or invasive AD biomarkers (CSF and imaging) and newer plasma biomarkers.

Hide