Kaj Blennow, Sweden

University of Gothenburg Neurochemistry
Kaj Blennow is Professor and Academic Chair in Neurochemistry at University of Gothenburg, and Head of the Clinical Neurochemistry Lab at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. He has published more than 1450 original research papers and review articles in peer-reviewed journals, and has an H-index of 138. His main research interest in fluid biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other brain disorders, and the application of these to increase the understanding of AD pathophysiology, as well as for screening, diagnostics and in therapy monitoring in trials. He is President of the Society for CSF analysis and Clinical Neurochemistry and head of the Alzheimer’s Association QC program for CSF biomarkers.

Moderator of 1 Session

LIVE SYMPOSIUM DISCUSSION

LIVE DISCUSSION - FLUID BIOMARKERS (2)

Date
13.03.2021, Saturday
Session Time
15:30 - 16:00
Session Icon
Live

Presenter of 3 Presentations

BLOOD BIOMARKERS FOR ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE - THE PROMISE FOR SCREENING, DIAGNOSTICS AND THERAPY MONITORING

Session Type
SYMPOSIUM
Date
10.03.2021, Wednesday
Session Time
10:00 - 12:00
Room
On Demand Symposia A
Lecture Time
10:30 - 10:45
Session Icon
On-Demand

Abstract

Abstract Body

Recent studies showing that it is possible to accurately detect the core AD pathologies amyloid deposition (A), tau pathology (T), and neurodegeneration (N), using easily accessible blood tests.

For A, ultrasensitive immunoassays and immunoprecipitation - mass spectrometry (IP-MS) methods show very high concordance (up to >90%) with brain amyloidosis evaluated by PET. For T, several phosphorylated tau species (P-tau181, P-tau217) in blood, show a specific increase in AD, and high concordance with tau PET. Further, plasma P-tau is increased very early, in cognitively unimpaired elderly who have a positive amyloid PET scan. For N, blood NFL reflects axonal degeneratio, with plasma levels being increased even in early stages of the disease, but also tracks neurodegeneration during the AD continuum. These biomarkers also show very low variation in longitudinal samples, and thus promise as a tool to monitor drug therapies, but we are still awaiting data on how these blood biomarkers perform in clinical trials on drugs showing clinical benefit.

Further work is needed to standardize these assays for clinical use, especially the development of Certified Reference Measurement Procedures (“Gold Standard methods”) and Certified Reference Materials (aliquoted plasma pools with known biomarker levels) to assure batch-to-batch stability and for harmonization across assays. We also need studies validating the diagnostic performance in prospective studies using pre-set cut-offs, with samples analysed week by week as they come to the lab.

These blood biomarkers show promise for being clinically useful, easily accessible and cheap, tools for screening and possibly also diagnostics.

Hide