Background

Ocrelizumab (OCR) is approved for the treatment of relapsing and primary progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS).

Objectives

In a real-world setting, to describe 1) baseline characteristics of patients with MS treated with OCR, 2) treatment pathway across lines of therapy up to initiation of OCR, and 3) initial clinical experience.

Methods

This analysis included adult patients with MS from the German NeuroTransData (NTD) Registry, a network of 66 neurology outpatient services across Germany. Patients were treated with OCR between January 2018 and January 2020. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze baseline patient characteristics recorded within 3 months prior to or at time of OCR initiation. Occurrence of relapse was analyzed in relapse-remitting MS (RRMS) patients with ≥3 months follow-up data from OCR initiation.

Results

As of January 2020, the NTD registry included 439 patients treated with OCR, including 352 patients with RRMS, 35 with relapsing secondary progressive MS (rSPMS), and 52 with primary progressive MS (PPMS). Median age at OCR initiation varied from 41.7 years, 54.5 years, to 52.5 years in patients with RRMS, rSPMS, and PPMS, respectively. Most RRMS and rSPMS patients were female (64.8% and 54.3%) compared to PPMS patients (46.2%). Median disease duration from symptom onset up to OCR initiation was longer in rSPMS patients (14.9 years) than in RRMS (10.8 years) and PPMS (5.7 years). Median EDSS at OCR start was 2.5, 6.0, and 4.0 in the RRMS, rSPMS, and PPMS cohorts, respectively. OCR was initiated as first disease modifying therapy (DMT) therapy in 12.2%, 11.4%, and 71.2% of RRMS, rSPMS, and PPMS patients, respectively. 258 RRMS patients directly switched from another DMT, primarily from fingolimod (23.3%) and natalizumab (19.8%). 319 patients with RRMS had ≥3 months follow-up during OCR exposure; of these, 283 remained relapse free (88.7%; 95% CI 84.9, 91.8) within a median follow-up time of 1 year (Q1-Q3, 0.6-1.3 years). Annualized relapse rate was 0.13 (95 % CI 0.09, 0.16).

Conclusions

In this German outpatient real world cohort, RRMS and rSPMS patients treated with OCR, on average had a disease duration ≥10 years and already reached a moderate to severe disability status. Most patients received previous DMT and OCR was initiated most frequently as second line treatment. Although PPMS patients showed a shorter disease duration, the disability status was relatively severe. Only about one third of patients received previous DMT.

Background

Peginterferon (pegIFN) beta-1a with a prolonged half-life and increased systemic exposure was developed for the treatment (tx) of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) resulting in less frequent dosing intervals without attenuating the biological or pharmacodynamic properties associated with existing IFN treatments. Real-world data with pegIFN beta-1a in clinical practice are limited. NeuroTransData GmbH (NTD) is a Germany-wide network of neurologists and psychiatrists. The NTD MS registry is a database capturing demographic, clinical history, and clinical variables from MS patients in a real-world setting.

Objectives

To compare pegIFN beta-1a populations with populations using the following injectables: SC IFN beta-1a, IM IFN beta-1a, SC IFN beta-1b, glatiramer acetate (GA).

Methods

NTD registry data from adult patients with RRMS who initiated tx no earlier than 2014, had ≥12 months of tx exposure, and ≥1 EDSS measurement or a relapse after index therapy initiation were retrospectively analyzed. Primary endpoints were annualized relapse rate (ARR) and time to first relapse. The secondary endpoint was time to confirmed disability progression (CDP). Patient characteristics between treatment groups were compared using propensity-score matching (PSM).

Results

In total, 175 pegIFN beta-1a patients, 308 from the IFN group (SC IFN beta-1a, IM IFN beta-1a, SC IFN beta-1b), and 287 GA patients were included in the analysis set. Mean tx duration was 2.5, 2.7, and 2.4 years, respectively. After PSM, no difference was found in the ARR and time to relapse between pegIFN beta-1a patients and patients from the IFN group (estimated ARR ratio 1.18; 95% CI 0.72, 1.94; p= 0.5047; relapse hazard ratio [HR] 1.14; 95% CI 0.71, 1.84; p=0.5790) or the GA group (estimated ARR ratio 0.74; 95% CI 0.45, 1.24; p=0.2608; relapse HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.47, 1.25; p=0.2813). For time to CDP, a significantly higher estimated treatment effect in favor of pegIFN beta-1a was found compared to both, the IFN (CDP HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.21, 0.89; p=0.0234) and the GA group (CDP HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.22, 0.97; p=0.0425).

Conclusions

Statistically significant superiority of pegIFN beta-1a was demonstrated for time to CDP. However, the current analysis is limited by small sample sizes and follow-up time. Updated results with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up time will be presented in order to assess if superiority of pegIFN beta-1a in other endpoints can be supported by statistical evidence.

This study was funded by Biogen.

Background

Ocrelizumab (OCR) is approved for the treatment of relapsing and primary progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS).

Objectives

In a real-world setting, to describe 1) baseline characteristics of patients with MS treated with OCR, 2) treatment pathway across lines of therapy up to initiation of OCR, and 3) initial clinical experience.

Methods

This analysis included adult patients with MS from the German NeuroTransData (NTD) Registry, a network of 66 neurology outpatient services across Germany. Patients were treated with OCR between January 2018 and January 2020. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze baseline patient characteristics recorded within 3 months prior to or at time of OCR initiation. Occurrence of relapse was analyzed in relapse-remitting MS (RRMS) patients with ≥3 months follow-up data from OCR initiation.

Results

As of January 2020, the NTD registry included 439 patients treated with OCR, including 352 patients with RRMS, 35 with relapsing secondary progressive MS (rSPMS), and 52 with primary progressive MS (PPMS). Median age at OCR initiation varied from 41.7 years, 54.5 years, to 52.5 years in patients with RRMS, rSPMS, and PPMS, respectively. Most RRMS and rSPMS patients were female (64.8% and 54.3%) compared to PPMS patients (46.2%). Median disease duration from symptom onset up to OCR initiation was longer in rSPMS patients (14.9 years) than in RRMS (10.8 years) and PPMS (5.7 years). Median EDSS at OCR start was 2.5, 6.0, and 4.0 in the RRMS, rSPMS, and PPMS cohorts, respectively. OCR was initiated as first disease modifying therapy (DMT) therapy in 12.2%, 11.4%, and 71.2% of RRMS, rSPMS, and PPMS patients, respectively. 258 RRMS patients directly switched from another DMT, primarily from fingolimod (23.3%) and natalizumab (19.8%). 319 patients with RRMS had ≥3 months follow-up during OCR exposure; of these, 283 remained relapse free (88.7%; 95% CI 84.9, 91.8) within a median follow-up time of 1 year (Q1-Q3, 0.6-1.3 years). Annualized relapse rate was 0.13 (95 % CI 0.09, 0.16).

Conclusions

In this German outpatient real world cohort, RRMS and rSPMS patients treated with OCR, on average had a disease duration ≥10 years and already reached a moderate to severe disability status. Most patients received previous DMT and OCR was initiated most frequently as second line treatment. Although PPMS patients showed a shorter disease duration, the disability status was relatively severe. Only about one third of patients received previous DMT.

Background

Peginterferon (pegIFN) beta-1a with a prolonged half-life and increased systemic exposure was developed for the treatment (tx) of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) resulting in less frequent dosing intervals without attenuating the biological or pharmacodynamic properties associated with existing IFN treatments. Real-world data with pegIFN beta-1a in clinical practice are limited. NeuroTransData GmbH (NTD) is a Germany-wide network of neurologists and psychiatrists. The NTD MS registry is a database capturing demographic, clinical history, and clinical variables from MS patients in a real-world setting.

Objectives

To compare pegIFN beta-1a populations with populations using the following injectables: SC IFN beta-1a, IM IFN beta-1a, SC IFN beta-1b, glatiramer acetate (GA).

Methods

NTD registry data from adult patients with RRMS who initiated tx no earlier than 2014, had ≥12 months of tx exposure, and ≥1 EDSS measurement or a relapse after index therapy initiation were retrospectively analyzed. Primary endpoints were annualized relapse rate (ARR) and time to first relapse. The secondary endpoint was time to confirmed disability progression (CDP). Patient characteristics between treatment groups were compared using propensity-score matching (PSM).

Results

In total, 175 pegIFN beta-1a patients, 308 from the IFN group (SC IFN beta-1a, IM IFN beta-1a, SC IFN beta-1b), and 287 GA patients were included in the analysis set. Mean tx duration was 2.5, 2.7, and 2.4 years, respectively. After PSM, no difference was found in the ARR and time to relapse between pegIFN beta-1a patients and patients from the IFN group (estimated ARR ratio 1.18; 95% CI 0.72, 1.94; p= 0.5047; relapse hazard ratio [HR] 1.14; 95% CI 0.71, 1.84; p=0.5790) or the GA group (estimated ARR ratio 0.74; 95% CI 0.45, 1.24; p=0.2608; relapse HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.47, 1.25; p=0.2813). For time to CDP, a significantly higher estimated treatment effect in favor of pegIFN beta-1a was found compared to both, the IFN (CDP HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.21, 0.89; p=0.0234) and the GA group (CDP HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.22, 0.97; p=0.0425).

Conclusions

Statistically significant superiority of pegIFN beta-1a was demonstrated for time to CDP. However, the current analysis is limited by small sample sizes and follow-up time. Updated results with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up time will be presented in order to assess if superiority of pegIFN beta-1a in other endpoints can be supported by statistical evidence.

This study was funded by Biogen.