Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
Immunology

Author Of 3 Presentations

Biomarkers and Bioinformatics Poster Presentation

P0172 - The prognostic value of lipid-specific IgM oligoclonal bands versus IgM index in patients with a clinical isolated syndrome: a comparative study. (ID 1114)

Speakers
Presentation Number
P0172
Presentation Topic
Biomarkers and Bioinformatics

Abstract

Background

The value of intrathecal IgM synthesis (ITMS) is increasingly recognized as a prognostic biomarker in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). However, no comparative studies between different methods to assess ITMS have been described previously evaluating the prognosis of patients with CIS.

Objectives

To compare the predictive value of IgM Reibergram (IR) and the presence of lipid-specific IgM oligoclonal bands (LS-OCMB) in CSF to predict conversion to clinically defined multiple sclerosis (CDMS), and the onset of EDSS of 3, 6 and a secondary progressive MS (SPMS).

Methods

An observational single-center study with CIS patients with at least 2 years of follow-up attended at Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal was performed. Demographics, clinical, radiological and immunological variables were collected.

Results

196 patients were included, 131 (66.8%) women, with a median (range) age of 31 (12–63) years and mean (SD) follow-up of 13.2 (±7.0) years. Overall, positive LS-OCMB was observed in 52 (26.5%) patients and IR in 32/193 (16.6%), reaching a concordance of 59.4% between both. The risk of CDMS was significantly higher exclusively among LS-OCMB (adjusted HR 1.80 (95%CI 1.24-2.62), p=0.002), but not for IR. In addition, LS-OCMB predicted a higher risk of reaching an EDSS of 3 (OR 1.97, p=0.044), an EDSS of 6 (OR 3.82, p=0.001) and a SPMS (OR 2.67, p=0.013) among MS patients. No significant differences were observed with IR.

Conclusions

LS-OCMB are a more sensitive and reliable CSF biomarker to predict the natural history of CIS patients compare to semi-quantitative IR.

Collapse
Disease Modifying Therapies – Mechanism of Action Poster Presentation

P0324 - Effect of ocrelizumab treatment in peripheral blood leukocyte subsets of Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis patients (ID 1613)

Abstract

Background

Ocrelizumab is the first drug approved as disease modifying treatment for primary progressive (PP) multiple sclerosis (MS). As a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting CD20 cells, it is widely known that ocrelizumab treatment results in B cells depletion, but less is known about the effects of this drug in other blood leukocyte subsets of PPMS patients.

Objectives

To explore the changes induced by ocrelizumab in blood immune cells of PPMS patients to further understand their effects in the abnormal inflammatory response.

Methods

Multi-centre prospective longitudinal study including fifty‐three PPMS patients who initiated ocrelizumab treatment. Effector, memory, and regulatory cells were analyzed by flow cytometry at baseline and after 6 months of treatment. To assess differences between baseline and after 6 months, Wilcoxon matched paired tests were used and p values were corrected using Bonferroni test.

Results

Ocrelizumab decreased numbers of naïve and memory B cells (p<0.0001) and those of B cells producing interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (p<0.0001 in all cases). A reduction of CD20+ T cell numbers (p=0.02) and percentages (p<0.0001) was also observed. We also detected a clear remodelation of the T cell compartment characterized by relative increases of the naïve/effector ratio in CD4+ (p=0.002) and CD8+ (p=0.002) T cells, and relative decreases of CD4+ (p=0.03) and CD8+ (p=0.004) T cells producing interferon-gamma. Total monocyte numbers increased (p=0.002), with no changes in those producing inflammatory cytokines. All these changes resulted in a reduction of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels (p=0.009).

Conclusions

Effector B cell depletion by ocrelizumab treatment induces changes in the T cell response of PPMS patients towards a low inflammatory profile. This resulted in a decrease of sNfL levels.

Collapse
Disease Modifying Therapies – Risk Management Poster Presentation

P0327 - Effectiveness and safety profile of the Natalizumab extended interval dosing in a Spanish cohort (ID 1815)

Presentation Number
P0327
Presentation Topic
Disease Modifying Therapies – Risk Management

Abstract

Background

Previous Biogen analyses of the US TOUCH Registry showed that the risk of developing natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) among anti-JCV antibody positive natalizumab-treated patients was significantly lower with extended interval dosing (EID) compared with standard interval dosing (SID). However, the efficacy of EID was not evaluated in these analyses. Real-world studies and modelling data suggest that a patient population stable on natalizumab SID who is then switched to EID is more likely to maintain efficacy with EID as compared to a population who initiates natalizumab on EID.

Objectives

The main objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness (measured by the annualized relapse rate - ARR) of natalizumab EID in subjects who have been previously treated with natalizumab SID during the 12-month list, in relation to continuous SID treatment.

Methods

Observational, open-label study with retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) treated at Hospital Ramón y Cajal (Madrid) with natalizumab for 12 months using SID (Infusion every month). All patients were transferred after a period of initial treatment at standard interval doses to a 6-week EID, according to hospital protocol, eliminating a potential selection bias for assigning less active patients to the EID group Demographic, clinical, radiological and immunological variables were collected.

Results

61 patients were included, 33 (54%) women, with a median (range) age at treatment initiation of 35 (17-55) years. Median (range) treatment duration was 5,2 years (2-11,3), 3,47 years (1,4-7,8) in SID, 1,7 years (0,5-4,1) in EID. There was no difference in ARR, mean [95% confidence interval (CI)], (SID: 0.05 [0,01-0,1]; EID: 0.02 [0,02-0,05]; P=0.558), or EDSS (SID: 2,35 [1,9-2,7], EID: 2,67 [2,2-3,9]; p=0,42).

Conclusions

This study does not demonstrate significant differences in relapse outcomes between SID and EID periods of patients who switched to EID from natalizumab after ≥1 year on SID. These results are consistent with previous analyzes without comparison that concluded that efficacy is maintained after switching to EID. Consistent MRI and EDSS results will be shown in the final poster. An ongoing prospective randomized trial of EID versus SID will provide a more complete understanding of the effectiveness of natalizumab EID.

Collapse