Author Of 2 Presentations
P0236 - Serum immunoglobulin levels and infection risk in the Phase 3 trials of ofatumumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis (ID 1566)
Abstract
Background
Ofatumumab, a fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, demonstrated superior efficacy vs teriflunomide with a favorable safety profile in relapsing MS (RMS) patients in the Phase 3 ASCLEPIOS I/II trials. Reductions in serum immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgG levels are associated with anti-CD20 therapies.
Objectives
To assess the effect of ofatumumab on serum Ig levels and evaluate potential association between a decrease in IgM/IgG levels and risk of infections.
Methods
Patients were randomized to receive subcutaneous ofatumumab 20 mg (initial doses: Days 1, 7, and 14; subsequent doses: every 4 weeks from Week (W) 4 onwards) or oral teriflunomide 14 mg once-daily for up to 30 months (m, mean follow-up duration: 18m). Serum IgM/IgG levels were monitored at baseline (BL), W4, W12, and every 12 weeks thereafter (ofatumumab, n=946; teriflunomide, n=936). Proportion of patients with IgM/IgG levels below the lower limit of normal (<LLN [g/L]: IgM, 0.4; IgG, 7.0), and association of IgM/IgG levels with incidence of infections that occurred up to 1m prior and 1m after any decrease in IgM/IgG levels (<LLN vs ≥LLN) were analyzed. Infections in conjunction with IgM/IgG <LLN and lymphopenia and/or neutropenia on the same visit were also analyzed.
Results
Mean IgM/IgG levels were well within reference ranges over time. Over all post-BL visits, a higher proportion of patients on ofatumumab had IgM<LLN (17.7% vs 6.6%), whilst a lower proportion had IgG<LLN (14.2% vs 22.9%) vs patients on teriflunomide. At W96, a similar trend was observed (IgM<LLN: 11.1% vs 1.9%; IgG<LLN: 2.7% vs 6.0%). Proportion of patients on ofatumumab who experienced ≥1 infection within 1m prior and until 1m after IgM<LLN was 31.1% (52/167; 2 serious) vs 51.5% (400/777) with IgM≥LLN (18 serious). Similarly, 27.6% (37/134) reported infections during a drop in IgG<LLN (3 serious) vs 50.6% (410/810) with IgG≥LLN (21 serious). The most common infection was nasopharyngitis. Overall, 1/11 patients with concurrent IgM<LLN and lymphopenia and/or neutropenia, and 7/20 patients with concurrent IgG<LLN and lymphopenia and/or neutropenia reported infections; none were serious.
Conclusions
Reduction in serum IgM levels was observed over time, but for the majority of patients, Ig levels remained above the lower limit of normal. No decrease in IgG levels was reported within the observation period (mean follow-up: 18m). There was no apparent association between decreased Ig levels and infections in conjunction with lymphopenia and/or neutropenia in ofatumumab-treated RMS patients.
P0753 - Safety of satralizumab based on pooled data from phase 3 studies in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (ID 1375)
Abstract
Background
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is implicated in the immunopathology of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Satralizumab, a humanized recycling monoclonal antibody that inhibits the IL-6 receptor, demonstrated a reduction in NMOSD relapse risk in two phase 3 studies: SAkuraSky (satralizumab in combination with baseline immunosuppressants; NCT02028884), and SAkuraStar (satralizumab monotherapy; NCT02073279).
Objectives
To evaluate the safety of satralizumab vs placebo in a pooled population of NMOSD patients from the SAkura studies, including the latest data from the open-label extension (OLE) period of the studies.
Methods
SAkuraStar and SAkuraSky are randomized studies comprising a double-blind (DB) period (satralizumab 120mg Q4W vs placebo) followed by an OLE period (satralizumab only). The combined DB and extension period was defined as the overall satralizumab treatment (OST) period (cut-off: 7 Jun 2019). Safety was evaluated in the DB and OST periods and reported as adverse event (AE) rates per 100 patient-years (PY).
Results
The pooled DB population included 178 patients (satralizumab, n=104; placebo, n=74), and 166 patients received satralizumab in the OST. Median duration of safety observation with satralizumab was 96.1 weeks in the DB period and 131.9 weeks in the OST period. Rates of AEs and serious AEs were comparable between satralizumab and placebo groups in the DB period (AEs: 478.49 vs 506.51 events/100PY, respectively; serious AEs: 14.97 vs 17.98 events/100PY, respectively), and were consistent in the OST period. In the DB period, four patients (3.8%) in the satralizumab group and five (6.8%) in the placebo group discontinued treatment due to AEs. Serious infection rates were comparable between the satralizumab and placebo groups in the DB period (4.13 vs 6.99 events/100PY) and remained stable in the OST (3.88 events/100PY). No opportunistic infections were observed in the satralizumab group. The injection-related reaction (IRR) rate was higher with satralizumab vs placebo in the DB period (17.03 vs 8.99 events/100PY); IRRs were mostly mild-to-moderate and did not lead to treatment discontinuation. Laboratory abnormalities were in line with those expected with IL-6 receptor antagonists in the DB and OST period. No deaths or anaphylactic reactions were reported.
Conclusions
In NMOSD patients, satralizumab was well tolerated and showed a favorable safety profile. Results from the OST period were consistent with the DB period.