Advanced diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) sequences, in combination with biophysical models, provide new information on the microstructural properties of the tissue.
To investigate the differences in intra-axonal signal fraction (IASF) between perilesional normal-appearing white matter (pl-NAWM), white matter lesions (WML) without (rim-) and with paramagnetic rim (rim+) comparing eight biophysical diffusion models.
The study included 102 MS patients: RRMS: 66%, SPMS: 18%, PPMS: 16%, mean age 46±14; female 64%, disease duration 12.16±18.18 yrs, median EDSS: 2.5.
DW-MRI data were acquired with 1.8mm isotropic resolution and b-values [0, 700, 1000, 2000, 3000] s/mm2.
Lesion masks were generated with a deep-learning-based method and manually corrected if required; pl-NAWM was defined as a region of 3-voxels around each WML; 225 paramagnetic rim lesions were manually identified based on 3D EPI and 2330 were labelled as rim-.
The following microstructural models were applied: Ball and Stick, Ball and Rockets, AMICO-NODDI, SMT-NODDI, MCMDI, NODDIDA, CHARMED, Microstructure Bayesian approach.
Delta (WML - pl-NAWM) was calculated for each WML, and one-side Mann Whitney U was used to compare the delta between models, followed by Bonferroni to correct for multiple testing.
Mean difference and Cohen's d was used to assess differences between lesions with extensive axonal damage (rim+) and other WML (rim-).
All models applied in this study reported low IASF in rim+ WML, medium IASF in rim- WML and relatively high IASF in pl-NAWM. However, a broad spectrum of IASF values was identified from the different models: relatively simple models such as Ball and Stick and CHARMED, showed low delta IASF within lesions, while MCMDI models reported the highest significant difference compared to other models (p<0.0001). The comparison between WML and pl-NAWM mean IASF across models showed that MCDMI exhibited the highest difference (mean 0.13, Cohen’s d 1.34). AMICO-NODDI and SMT-NODDI showed close results (mean difference 0.12/0.12 and Cohen’s d 1.46/1.51).
The models best discriminating IASF between rim+ and rim- lesions were MCMDI and NODIDDA (mean 0.08/0.07, Cohen’s d -0.69/-0.70).
We compared eight WM diffusion models for assessment of intralesional axonal damage in MS patients. The comparison between WML and pl-NAWM showed that robustness of the method, identified with SMT-based and NODDI-based models, it is crucial. For the comparison between lesions with a high level of damage (rim +) and other WML, the diffusivity estimation appeared to play an important role. The method which appeared both robust and able to estimate the diffusivity of the tissue was MCMDI, which performed best in both cases.