Observational Studies Poster Presentation

P0846 - Characteristics of relapsing multiple sclerosis patients treated with cladribine tablets in five European countries: multi-year chart review (ID 375)

Speakers
  • F. Zeng
Authors
  • F. Zeng
  • G. Harty
  • S. Wong
  • E. Maslova
  • R. Schade
  • B. Row
Presentation Number
P0846
Presentation Topic
Observational Studies

Abstract

Background

In 2017, cladribine tablets 10mg (given as 3.5 mg/kg over 2 years) (CT) were approved for highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) in the European Union. Clinical care delivery in RMS can be informed by understanding the profile of RMS patients treated with CT in real-world settings.

Objectives

To describe characteristics of patients with RMS treated with CT in the largest Europe Union Five countries (EU5) since market authorization.

Methods

The Ipsos Healthcare Multiple Sclerosis Monitor collects data from 300 neurologists across France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (UK) on their MS practices and patient information. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient age and sex, country, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score as of CT initiation, disease modifying drugs (DMD) history, and physician reason for prescribing CT.

Results

A total of 182 patients who initiated CT were identified in UK (n=42, 23.1%), Germany (n=82, 45.1%), Italy (n=26, 14.3%), Spain (n=26, 14.3%) and France (n=6, 3.3%) from October 2017 to June 2019. 65.4% were female, 46.7% and 30.8% were between the ages of 18-34 and 35-44 years old, respectively. Only 98 (53.8%) patients had EDSS data at CT initiation, with median EDSS (25 percentile, 75 percentile) equal to 3 (1.5, 4.5). The majority of patients (94.5%) had a relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) diagnosis. At CT initiation, 34.6% of patients were naïve to DMDs. The most common DMDs before CT initiation were dimethyl fumarate (18.5%), fingolimod (13.4%), and natalizumab (12.6%). Efficacy for active/highly active disease was the primary reason cited by physicians for prescribing CT (31.3%), followed by efficacy in stabilizing or preventing new lesions (15.9%).

Conclusions

In this real-world analysis of patients treated with CT in the EU5, more than one third of patients were naïve to DMDs. The most frequently cited reason for physicians to prescribe CT was efficacy for active/highly active disease.

Collapse