Clinical Outcome Measures Poster Presentation

P0124 - Ocrelizumab treatment in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a single-center real-world experience (ID 1619)

Speakers
  • C. Lapucci
Authors
  • G. Boffa
  • C. Lapucci
  • M. Cellerino
  • G. Novi
  • E. Sbragia
  • N. Bruschi
  • E. Mancuso
  • F. Tazza
  • A. Laroni
  • E. Capello
  • A. Uccelli
  • M. Inglese
Presentation Number
P0124
Presentation Topic
Clinical Outcome Measures

Abstract

Background

ocrelizumab (OCR) treatment in pivotal trials of patients (pts) with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) was associated with high clinical efficacy and safety. However, real word data on efficacy and safety are still scarce

Objectives

To provide first experience on patients with RRMS treated with OCR in a single center real-world setting (MS Center of University of Genoa)

Methods

We collected safety and efficacy data from pts with RRMS treated with OCR. The probability of disability worsening-free survival, relapse-free survival, MRI-activity free-survival and NEDA-3 status was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

Results

96 RRMS pts [60 females (62.5%), mean (SD) age 37.3 (10.2) years] with a mean disease duration (DD) of 9.6 (9.3) years, a median (IQR) baseline EDSS of 2.5 (2-4) and a mean ARR of 0.79 (0.73). Median (IQR) number of previous DMTs was 1 (0-2). The mean time from previous DMT discontinuation and OCR start of 209 (661) days. Reasons for previous DMTs discontinuation were (i) lack of efficacy for 45 (67%), (ii) occurrence of adverse events for 7 (10%) and (iii) high JCV titer during natalizumab treatment for 5 (7.5%) pts. 28 pts (29.5%) had not received any DMT prior to OCR. Naïve pts had significantly shorter disease duration (2.6 vs 12.5 years; p<0.0001), had higher ARR (1.1 vs 0.7; p=0.002) and more frequently exhibited inflammatory activity on baseline MRI scan (96.3% vs 74.6%; p=0.019). Mean follow-up (FU) was 1.4 (1.2) years.

At 1-year FU, MRI-inflammatory activity free survival was 75.9%, relapse free survival was 95.9%, progression free survival was 98.7%. 2-years NEDA-3 status was achieved in 73.6% of pts. At multivariate analyses, adjusting for DD, ARR and baseline MRI activity, 2-years NEDA-3 status was significantly higher in naïve compared with treated pts [90.7% versus 60.8% at the end of the observation period; HR (CI 95% ) 0.14 (0.03-0.65); p=0.012]. We recorded 55 adverse events in 39 pts (4 lower respiratory tract infections; 18 upper respiratory tract infections; 7 herpes simplex-1 reactivation; 1 shingles; 8 upper urinary tract infections; 2 breast cancers). No serious infusion-associated reactions were reported

Conclusions

OCR treatment allows complete disease control in a high proportion of real-world RRMS pts, with a manageable safety profile. Although ocrelizumab can control disease activity after failure of highly efficacy DMTs, its efficacy seems to be higher in naïve patients

Collapse