Poster Display session Poster Display session

30TiP - Predictive markers of immune mediated adverse events and of treatment response in patients treated with durvalumab monotherapy or in combination with tremelimumab (IOPREDI study) (ID 448)

Presentation Number
30TiP
Lecture Time
12:30 - 12:30
Speakers
  • A. Marabelle (Villejuif, France)
Session Name
Poster Display session
Location
Room B, Geneva Palexpo, Geneva, Switzerland
Date
14.12.2018
Time
12:30 - 13:00
Authors
  • A. Marabelle (Villejuif, France)
  • F. Ghiringhelli (DIJON, France)
  • M. Ayyoub (Toulouse, France)
  • E. Tartour (Paris, France)
  • O. Adotevi (Besançon, CEDEX, France)
  • Y. Loriot (Villejuif, France)
  • O. Lambotte (Le Kremlin Bicetre, France)
  • D. Cupissol (Montpellier, CEDEX 5, France)
  • D. Damotte (Paris, France)
  • J. Adam (Villejuif, France)
  • M. Bonvalet (Villejuif, France)
  • B. Petre Lazar (Paris, France)
  • M. Licour (Courbevoie, France)
  • N. Chaput (Villejuif, CEDEX, France)

Abstract

Background

Immune-targeted monoclonal antibodies blocking inhibitory immune checkpoints such as CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1 have shown durable responses in multiple tumour types. These drugs generate a new type of complications in oncology: immune-related adverse events (ImAE). There is no established predictive biomarker to identify patients (pts) who are likely to develop severe ImAE. The hypothesis is that imAEs could result from host related pre-existing factors: Activation of self-reactive T and B cells, genetic predisposition, metabolic factors, enhanced cross reactivity between cancer cells, healthy cells and resident microbiota flora, and co-morbidity, concomitant treatments and patients’ environment. Response to immunotherapy could also be associated with pre-existing factors and tumor microenvironment features.

Background

Immune-targeted monoclonal antibodies blocking inhibitory immune checkpoints such as CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1 have shown durable responses in multiple tumour types. These drugs generate a new type of complications in oncology: immune-related adverse events (ImAE). There is no established predictive biomarker to identify patients (pts) who are likely to develop severe ImAE. The hypothesis is that imAEs could be due to host related pre-existing factors: Activation of self-reactive T and B cells, genetic predisposition, metabolic factors, enhanced cross reactivity between cancer cells, healthy cells and resident microbiota flora, and co-morbidity, concomitant treatments and patients’ environment. Response to immunotherapy could also be associated with pre-existing factors and tumor microenvironment features.

Trial design

The study is a French ancillary study of a phase 3b, open-Label, multi-Centre, safety study of fixed-dose durvalumab + tremelimumab combination therapy or durvalumab monotherapy in advanced solid malignancies (STRONG) (NCT03084471). By collecting additional blood and tumour samples (table 1) the aim of this ancillary study is to define the immune phenotype, microbiome analysis of patients prior to an immunotherapy and who are subsequently developing an imAE or who achieve response to identify and characterize predictive factors of the toxicity and of efficacy. For both efficacy and safety objectives, respectively 85 and 300 patients will be required. The STRONG study currently includes pts with an urothelial and nonurothelial carcinoma of the urinary tract, treated with durvalumab as single agent at progression on or after of chemotherapy. As of July 2018, the IOPREDI ancillary study has been opened, 18 centres have been activated and 9 patients have been enrolled. Table 1 a) definition of AESI see section 6, b) only at baseline for polymorphisms, c) within 72 hours prior to the first treatment administration d) within 72 hours of occurrence of AESI.

Methods

The study is a French ancillary study of a phase 3b, open-Label, multi-Centre, safety study of fixed-dose durvalumab + tremelimumab combination therapy or durvalumab monotherapy in advanced solid malignancies (STRONG) (NCT03084471). By collecting additional blood and tumour samples (table 1) the aim of this ancillary study is to define the immune phenotype, microbiome analysis of patients prior to an immunotherapy and who are subsequently developing an imAE or who achieve response to identify and characterize predictive factors of the toxicity and of efficacy. For both efficacy and safety objectives, respectively 85 and 300 patients will be required.

The STRONG study currently includes pts with an urothelial and nonurothelial carcinoma of the urinary tract, treated with durvalumab as single agent at progression on or after of chemotherapy. As of July 2018, the IOPREDI ancillary study has been opened ,18 centres have been activated and 9 patients have been enrolled.

Table 1

a) definition of AESI see section 6, b) only at baseline for polymorphisms, c) within 72 hours prior to the first treatment administration

d) within 72 hours of occurrence of AESI

Visit

Screening

Treatment period

Baseline

Treatment period

C2D1

Treatment period

In case of AESIa ≥ grade 2

Treatment period

C3D1

At progression

Week

Weeks -4 to

Week -1

Week 0

Week 4

Week 8

Autoantibodies Polymorphisms (serum)

Xb

X

X

X

Cytokines and soluble factors / Metabolic factors (plasma)

X

X

X

Cell-free DNA

X

X

Immune cells RNA (whole blood)

X

Hb1Ac, glycaemia, T3 and T4

X

X

X

Stools sample

X c

X d

Telomerase, commensal and NYESO-1 T cells specific immune response (frozen PBMC)

X

X

X

X

X

Epithelial mesenchymal transition (tumor sample)

X

Clinical trial identification

EudraCT: 2016-005068-33.

Legal entity responsible for the study

AstraZeneca.

Funding

AstraZeneca.

Disclosure

A. Marabelle, F. Ghiringhelli: Honoraria for scientific boards: AstraZeneca. M. Ayyoub, O. Adotevi, Y. Loriot, O. Lambotte: Honoraria for advisory boards: AstraZeneca. D. Cupissol, D. Damotte, N. Chaput: Honoraria for scientific committee meetings: AstraZeneca. J. Adam: Honoraria for advisory boards: AstraZeneca. B. Petre Lazar, M. Licour: Employee of AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

VisitScreeningTreatment period BaselineTreatment period C2D1Treatment period In case of AESIa ≥grade 2Treatment period C3D1At progression
WeekWeeks -4 to Week -1Week 0Week 4Week 8
Autoantibodies Polymorphisms (serum)XbXXX
Cytokines and soluble factors / Metabolic factors (plasma)XXX
Cell-free DNAXX
Immune cells RNA (whole blood)X
Hb1Ac, glycaemia, T3 and T4XXX
Stools sampleX cd
Telomerase, commensal and NYESO-1 T cells specific immune response (frozen PBMC)XXXXX
Epithelial mesenchymal transition (tumor sample)X

Collapse