Poster Stem Cells

P230 - Imaging Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Construct for Cartilage Repair in a Preclinical Model

Presentation Topic
Stem Cells
Date
13.04.2022
Lecture Time
09:30 - 09:30
Room
Exhibition Foyer
Session Name
7.3 - Poster Viewing / Coffee Break / Exhibition
Session Type
Poster Session
Speaker
  • J. Santanna (Sao Paulo, BR)
Authors
  • J. Santanna (Sao Paulo, BR)
  • T. Lazzaretti (São Paulo, BR)
  • P. Roessler (Koblenz, DE)
  • R. Rogatto de Faria (Cotia, BR)
  • C. Tabet (São Paulo, BR)
  • A. Ferreira Orenha (São Paulo, BR)
  • A. José Hernandez (São Paulo, BR)
  • D. Franco Bueno (São Paulo, BR)
Disclosure
No Significant Commercial Relationship

Abstract

Purpose

Injury to articular cartilage has a high prevalence in the general population and athletes. The use of a scaffold-free tissue-engineered compound (TEC) avoided the need for a scaffold and turn the procedure safer. The assessment of the treatment of chondral lesions can be performed non-invasively with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which allows the analysis of the morphology and composition of the repair tissue. This study aims to evaluate cartilage regeneration with TEC using magnetic resonance imaging.

Methods and Materials

A cartilage defect on both knees was performed on miniature pigs. TEC was applied to one knee of each animal, totalizing 14 knees with TEC (experimental group) and 14 with chondral defect only (defect group). After 6 months, Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to evaluate morphology and repair quality and compositional characteristics. Lastly, cartilage repair was evaluated through histology using the ICRS-2 score.

Results

The mean value of MOCART in the group submitted to the defect without treatment was 46.2 ± 13.4, while the group treated with TEC had a mean score of 62.3 ± 12.3 (p<0.001). The compositional evaluation by T2 mapping showed that the repair tissue of the experimental group has a mean T2 value (53,42 ± 2,1) close to the mean T2 value of healthy cartilage (54,73 ± 2,28). And the mean T2 value of the repair area (50,98 ± 2,48) was significantly different from the mean T2 value of healthy cartilage (54,49 ± 1,72) in the defect group.

Conclusion

The evaluation of morphology and composition by magnetic resonance and histological analysis showed that the cartilage defect treated with tissue engineering construct was responsible for greater coverage and better quality of the defect compared to the untreated group.

Collapse