Yves P. Fougère (Switzerland)
CHUV DFMEPresenter of 1 Presentation
PERFORMANCE OF RT-PCR ON SALIVA SPECIMENS COMPARED TO NASOPHARYNGEAL SWABS FOR THE DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 IN CHILDREN: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE CLINICAL TRIAL (ID 1142)
Abstract
Background
Saliva RT-PCR has already been reported as an attractive alternative for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in adults. Pediatric evidence remains weak with discordant reported sensitivities.
Methods
Children and adolescents with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 were prospectively enrolled in a comparative clinical trial of saliva and nasopharyngeal (NP) RT-PCR between November and December 2020 from two outpatient clinics. Detection rates and sensitivities of saliva and NP RT-PCR were compared. Participants with discordant NP and saliva RT-PCR results were also compared as well as viral load (VL) from paired NP-Saliva swabs.
Results
Out of 405 patients enrolled, 397 patients had two tests performed. Mean age was 12.7 years (range 1.2-18) and 192 (48.3%) were female. Detection rates were 22.9% (95% CI 18.8-27.1%) by saliva RT-PCR, 25.4% (21.2-29.7%) by NP RT-PCR, and 26.7% (22.4-31.1%) by any test. Sensitivity of saliva compared to NP RT-PCR was 85.2% (78.2-92.1%) and 94.5% (89.8-99.2%) for NP compared to saliva PCR. For a NP RT-PCR VL threshold of ≥103 and ≥104 copies/ml, sensitivity of saliva increases to 88.7% and 95.2% respectively. The 15 patients who had an isolated positive NP RT-PCR were significantly younger (p=0.034), had a lower VL (p<0.001), and were not able to drool saliva at the end of the sampling (p=0.002). VLs were significantly lower with saliva PCR than with NP RT-PCR (median 8.7 cp/ml x104; IQR 1.2x104-5.2x105; vs median 4.0x107cp/ml; IQR 8.6x105-1.x108; p<0.001, 95CI: -4.5x102 to - 7.7x101).
Conclusions
Saliva PCR shows diagnostic performances close to NP RT-PCR for SARS-CoV2 detection in most symptomatic outpatient children and adolescents.
Clinical Trial Registration
NCT04613310