Proffered Paper session

5O - Cemiplimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in non-small cell lung cancer: Longer follow-up results from the phase III EMPOWER-Lung 3 trial

Presentation Number
5O
Lecture Time
15:22 - 15:34
Speakers
  • T. Makharadze (Batumi, Georgia)
Room
Auditorium 1
Date
Thu, 30.03.2023
Time
15:10 - 16:40
Authors
  • T. Makharadze (Batumi, Georgia)
  • M. Gogishvili (Tbilisi, Georgia)
  • T. Melkadze (Tbilisi, Georgia)
  • A. Baramidze (Tbilisi, Georgia)
  • D. Giorgadze (Omsk, Russian Federation)
  • K. D. Penkov (Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation)
  • K. Laktionov (Moscow, Russian Federation)
  • G. Nemsadze (Tbilisi, Georgia)
  • M. Nechaeva (Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation)
  • I. Rozhkova (Kaluga, Russian Federation)
  • E. Kalinka (Lódz, Poland)
  • S. Li (Tarrytown, United States of America)
  • Y. Li (Tarrytown, United States of America)
  • M. Kaul (Tarrytown, United States of America)
  • J. Pouliot (Tarrytown, United States of America)
  • F. Seebach (Tarrytown, United States of America)
  • I. Lowy (Tarrytown, United States of America)
  • G. Gullo (Tarrytown, United States of America)
  • P. Rietschel (Tarrytown, United States of America)

Abstract

Background

EMPOWER-Lung 3, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, examined cemiplimab (anti-PD-1) plus chemotherapy (chemo) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without EGFR, ALK or ROS1 aberrations, with either squamous or non-squamous histology and any level of PD-L1 expression. Previously we reported that, after 16.4 months follow-up, cemiplimab + chemo improved median overall survival (OS) over chemo alone (21.9 vs 13.0 months, HR = 0.71, 0.53–0.93). Here, we report longer-term data after 28.4 months follow-up.

Methods

Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive 4 cycles of platinum-doublet chemo, with 350 mg cemiplimab (n = 312) or placebo (n = 154) every 3 weeks for up to 108 weeks. The primary endpoint was OS; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rates (ORR).

Results

After a median of 28.4 months follow-up, cemiplimab + chemo continued to show significantly improved OS and PFS vs chemo alone. Median OS was 21.1 months for cemiplimab + chemo vs 12.9 months for chemo alone (HR = 0.65, 0.51–0.82, p = 0.0003). Median PFS was 8.2 months for cemiplimab + chemo vs 5.5 months for chemo alone (HR = 0.55, 0.44–0.68, p < 0.0001). ORRs were 43.6% vs 22.1%, with a duration of response of 16.4 and 7.3 months, respectively. Safety profiles for longer-term use of cemiplimab + chemo were generally consistent with previously reported data; Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 48.7% of patients in cemiplimab + chemo and 32.7% in chemotherapy alone.

m = MedianCemiplimab + chemo (N = 312)Chemo alone (N = 154)
mDuration of follow-up28.328.7
mOS, months21.112.9
HR (95% CI)0.65 (0.51, 0.82); P < 0.0003
mPFS, months8.25.5
HR (95% CI)0.55 (0.44, 0.68); P < 0.0001
ORR, %44%22%
Odds ratio (95% CI)2.82 (1.80-4.41); P < 0.0001
Complete response, n (%)13 (4%)0
Partial response, n (%)123 (39%)34 (22%)
Kaplan-Meier estimated mDOR (95% CI), months16.4 months7.3 months
≥Grade 3 TEAEs152 (48.7%)50 (32.7%)

CI, confidence interval; DOR, duration of response; HR, hazard ratio; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; TEAEs, treatment-emergent adverse events.

Conclusions

At 28.4 months of follow-up, the EMPOWER-3 Lung trial continues to show an improvement in benefit of cemiplimab in combination with chemo, compared to chemo alone, for patients with advanced squamous and non-squamous NSCLC, regardless of PD-L1 expression level and without EGFR, ALK or ROS1 aberrations.

Clinical trial identification

NCT03409614.

Editorial acknowledgement

Medical writing support was provided by Rachel McGrandle, MSc, of Prime, Knutsford, UK, funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sanofi. Responsibility for all opinions, conclusions, and data interpretation lies with the authors.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Funding

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sanofi.

Disclosure

K.D. Penkov: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Nektar, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Nektar. E. Kalinka: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Nektar, Pfizer, Roche, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. S. Li: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Y. Li: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. M. Kaul: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. J. Pouliot: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. F. Seebach: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. I. Lowy: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. G. Gullo: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. P. Rietschel: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Collapse