Mini Oral session

10MO - EMPOWER-Lung 1: Cemiplimab (CEMI) monotherapy as first-line (1L) treatment of patients (pts) with brain metastases from advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥50%: 3-year update (ID 806)

Session Name
Speakers
  • Saadettin Kilickap (Ankara, Turkey)
Date
Fri, 31.03.2023
Time
08:15 - 09:15
Room
Auditorium 1
Duration
5 Minutes

Abstract

Background

In Phase 3 EMPOWER-Lung 1 study (NCT03088540), 1L CEMI monotherapy resulted in significantly longer OS and PFS versus chemotherapy (CHEMO) for pts with aNSCLC with no actionable genomic aberrations, whose tumours express PD-L1 ≥50%. The study included pts with treated, clinically stable, baseline brain metastases, a hard-to-treat and underrepresented population in clinical trials. We previously reported improved OS and PFS with 1L CEMI versus CHEMO for this subgroup. In this post hoc analysis, we report 3-year outcomes.

Methods

In EMPOWER-Lung 1, pts were randomised 1:1 to CEMI 350 mg IV Q3W or investigator’s choice of CHEMO. The overall median follow-up duration from randomization to data cut-off (4 March 2022) was 37.1 months (mo; range 24.0–56.5). Here, we analyzed pts with treated, clinically stable brain metastases (radiological stability not required).

Results

In all, 69/565 (12.2%) pts with PD-L1 ≥50% had treated, clinically stable brain metastases at randomization. Baseline characteristics in CEMI (n=34) vs CHEMO (n=35) groups were: median age, 60.0 (range: 45–76) vs 62.0 (range: 48–77) yrs; male, 97.1% vs 82.9%; and non-squamous histology, 85.3% vs 74.3%. CEMI showed superior efficacy outcomes vs CHEMO: longer median OS (not reached vs 20.7 mo; HR=0.42, 0.20-0.87), longer median PFS (12.5 vs 5.3 mo; HR=0.34, 0.18–0.63), a higher ORR (55.9% vs 11.4%) and a longer median duration of response (31.7 mo vs 12.5 mo; Table). After baseline, disease progression in brain occurred in 5 (14.7%) pts with CEMI vs 7 (20%) with CHEMO. Incidence of grade ≥3 TEAEs was 35.3% in the CEMI group vs 60.0% in CHEMO.

Clinical outcomes

Cemiplimab (n=34)

Chemotherapy (n=35)

HR (cemiplimab vs chemotherapy)

OS, mo, median (95% CI)

NR (20.6–NE)

20.7 (9.1–29.9)

0.42 (0.20–0.87); P=0.0168

PFS, mo, median (95% CI)

12.5 (6.1–33.5)

5.3 (2.2–6.5)

0.34 (0.18–0.63); P=0.0004

ORR, %, (95% CI)

55.9 (37.9–72.8)

11.4 (3.2–26.7)

NA

Median (95% CI) duration of response (CR or PR), mo

31.7 (14.7–NE)

12.5 (4.4–NE)

NA

Data cutoff date 4 March 2022.
†Stratified log-rank test P-value.
CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; mo, months; NA, not applicable; NE, not evaluable; NR, not reached; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response.

Conclusions

Three-year follow up data shows durable clinical benefits and an acceptable safety profile with 1L CEMI monotherapy in subgroup analysis of pts with aNSCLC and brain metastases. CEMI is generally well tolerated in this subgroup.

Clinical trial identification

NCT03088540

Editorial acknowledgement

This study was funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Medical writing and editorial support was provided by John Facciponte, PhD, of Prime, Knutsford, UK, funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., according to Good Publication Practice guidelines.

Collapse