Poster viewing and lunch

165P - "Introduction of Magseed in the -DGH Setting; no Inferiority to Wire Localisation" (ID 377)

Lecture Time
12:15 - 12:15
Session Name
Poster viewing and lunch
Room
Exhibition area
Date
Fri, 12.05.2023
Time
12:15 - 13:00
Speakers
  • Huma Irshad (Crewe, United Kingdom)
Authors
  • Huma Irshad (Crewe, United Kingdom)
  • Vanessa Pope (Crewe, United Kingdom)
  • David Archampong (Crewe, United Kingdom)
  • Susan S. Hignett (Crewe, United Kingdom)

Abstract

Background

Wire guided localization is the gold standard technique for pre-operative localization of non-palpable breast cancers in patients undergoing wide local excision (WLE). It has logistical challenges as it needs to be performed on the day of surgery, requiring coordination of Breast, Radiology and Theatre teams. Reported complications include wire displacement, intra-operative difficulty localizing the tip, pneumothorax, and cardiac injuries. Magseed is an alternative localization technique using a magnetic seed, which can be placed up to 30 days pre-operatively. This is localized intraoperatively with a ‘Sentimag probe’. The iBRA-NET Localisation Study performed in UK demonstrated magseed localization as an effective technique in terms of patient convenience and satisfaction, accurate localisation and avoiding unnecessary scheduling delays/cancellations. Our breast unit changed from using wires to predominantly Magseed localisations in early 2020.

Methods

Data was retrospectively collected for all patients undergoing wire or Magseed localised WLE for non-palpable invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma-in-situ from 01/10/2019 to 01/10/2020. Accuracy was determined by the presence of cancer and wire/Magseed in the specimen or cavity shave, presence of clear margins, and need for re-excision. Complications within 30 days of surgery were also recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS statistics version 24 (Univariate analysis). P values under 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Magnetic seed (n=43) Wire (n=49) p-value p-value in national audit
Accurate localization 42 (97.7%) 48 (97.9%) 0.730 0.048*
Re-operation rate 8 (18.6%) 13 (26.5%) 0.458 0.574
Positive/Close margins 9 (20.9%) 9 (18.4%) 0.797 0.342
Specimen weight 34g (7.70-378.3g) 29g (5.5-201.4g) 0.362 0.362
Minor wound infection 3 2 0.147 0.170
Major wound infection (needing IV antibiotics) 1 0 0.352 0.527
Unexpected re-admission to hospital within 30 days 1 0 0.721 0.676
Peri-operative problem Magseed/wire dislodged from lesion 1 0 0.467 0.039*
Index lesion/clip not visible on specimen X-ray 3 1 0.261 0.406
Type of surgery Wide local excision 37 48 0.032* 0.002*
Therapeutic mammoplasty 5 1
Other (LICAP) 1 0
Results are shown in the table below.

Conclusions

Magseed can be introduced safely into the DGH setting, with non-inferior results compared to wire localisations. The technique has advantages for both patients and scheduling teams. Our findings support those of the National Localization Audit.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Collapse