Thorsten Kühn (Esslingen am Neckar, Germany)

Klinikum Esslingen

Author Of 2 Presentations

Poster Display session (ID 9)

48P - T-helper cell driven immune response as an effect for seroma formation (SF) after mastectomy (ME) in breast cancer (BC) (SerMa pilot EUBREAST 5) (ID 66)

Abstract

Background

Seroma formation (SF) is one of the most frequent complications after breast cancer (BC) surgery. It occurs most frequently in patients after mastectomy (ME). The aim of this trial was to study (auto)immunological processes as an effect for SF. Identification and characterization of immune cell populations as well as specific immune reactions found in seroma and peripheral blood in patients after ME were therefore the main points of interest. Sera of healthy controls (without seroma and breast cancer) were chosen for comparison.

Methods

In a subgroup analysis within a monocentric pilot phase of 16 BC patients who developed seroma after a ME flow cytometry analyses were performed to identify the general immune cell content in seroma fluid. The latter is measured in comparison to peripheral blood of the same patient and in contrast to healthy controls. In addition, subgroups of specific T-cell immune responses were specified.

Results

The population of B-cells, granulocytes and cytotoxic (CD3+/CD8+) T-cells were significantly reduced within the seroma compared to the blood of the patients and the blood of healthy controls. In contrast specific T helper-cells (Th2 and Th17) were significantly elevated in the seroma as well as in patient blood compared to blood results of healthy controls. Th22 showed significant higher values in seroma compared to blood results of healthy controls and of patient blood. Tregs were significantly reduced in blood and seroma fluid of patients compared to healthy controls.

Conclusions

We were able to detect a specific immune response in BC patients with SF. A general upregulation of the T-helper cell population was identified, whereas other immune cells decreased. These findings indicate a high inflammatory process with diminished protective regulatory responses through Tregs. Further investigations are needed to clarify the role of specific T-helper cell immune responses for a SF after BC surgery.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

intramural grants (university hospital Augsburg, Germnay).

Disclosure

N. Ditsch: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: TEVA. J. Sagasser: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pfizer. T. Kühn: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Celegene; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pfizer. C. Dannecker: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Collapse
Poster Display session (ID 9)

120P - AXSANA (AXillary Surgery After NeoAdjuvant Treatment) EUBREAST-3: an international prospective multicenter cohort study to evaluate different surgical methods of axillary staging in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT04373655) (ID 133)

Abstract

Background

The surgical staging procedure of the axilla in patients who convert from clinically positive (cN+) to clinically negative node status (ycN0) through neoadjuvant chemotherapy is still controversial. Different techniques such as Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (ALND), Targeted Axillary Dissection (TAD), Target Lymph Node Biopsy (TLNB) and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) are recommended by the national and international guidelines. In case of TAD and TLNB, the target lymph node can be marked using such markers as clip/coil, carbon ink, magnetic or radioactive seed, or a radar or radiofrequency marker. The AXSANA study is aiming to compare outcomes and morbidity rates between different techniques and will hopefully contribute to defining the optimal axillary staging procedure resulting in high oncological safety and improved quality of life.

Methods

AXSANA is an international prospective, non-interventional cohort study including patients clinically node-positive and scheduled to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The surgical staging procedure is performed according to the standard at their treating institution.

Results

So far, 1,524 patients from 19 countries were recruited and 68% converted to ycN0 status after NACT. In 53% of patients, the planned surgical staging procedure was TAD, followed by ALND (30%), SLNB (15%) and TLNB (2%). In 55% of enrolled patients, at least one node was marked before NACT, mostly using clips/coils (81%), carbon ink (10%), magnetic seeds (8%) and radar markers (1%).

Conclusions

The preliminary data show a strong heterogeneity regarding axillary staging among participating countries. After only 20 months of recruitment, over half of the target accrual (3,000 patients) has been reached. TAD is a widely used technique, but ALND and SLNB are also common. The results of the AXSANA study will clarify whether de-escalation of axillary surgery is a safe option for patients converting from cN+ to ycN0 through neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Clinical trial identification

NCT04373655.

Editorial acknowledgement

Dr. Rosa Dr Micco; San Raffaele Hospital Milan, Milan, Italy Ellen Schlichting, MD, PhD; Department for Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway Dr. Lia Pamela Rebaza, Unit of Basic and Transnational Reseach, Oncosalud-AUNA Clinic, Lima, Perus Dr. Petr V. Krivorotko, Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russia David Pinto, MD; Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Campalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal Prof. Florentia Peintinger, Medical University of Graz, Graz. Austria Dr. Maria Luisa Gasparri, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland and University of the Italian Switzerland (USI), Faculty of Biomedicine, Lugano, Switzerland Dr. Hagigat Valiyeva; Oncology Clinc of Azerbaijan Medical University, Baku, Azerbaijan Lukas Dostalek, MD Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic Dr. Helidon Nina; University Medical Center \"Mother Teresa\", Tirana, Albania Dr. Semra Gunay; Ministry of Health Istanbul Provincal Health Directorate Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Turkey Dr. Meryem Gunay Gurleyik, Ministry of Health Istanbul Provincial Helath Directorate Istanbul Haydarpasa Numune Research and Training Hospita, Turkey Dr. Elisabeth Thiemann, Brustzentrum Osnabrück, Niels-Stensen-Kliniken, Osnabrück, Germany Dr. Gabriele Kaltenecker, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.

Legal entity responsible for the study

EUBREAST.

Funding

AGO-B, AWOgyn e.V., Claudia von Schilling Foundation for Breast Cancer Research, Ehmann-Stiftung, Endomag, Merit Medical and Mammotome.

Disclosure

M. Thill: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Aurikamed; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Becton/Dickinson; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Biom'Up; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Celgene; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: ClearCut; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Clovis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Eisai; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Exact Sciences; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Gilead Science; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Norgine; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Neodynamics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Onkowissen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: pff Medical; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: RTI Surgical; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Seagen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Sysmex; Financial Interests, Institutional, Writing Engagements: Servier; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker: Art Tempi; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker: Connect Medica; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker: Hexal; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker: I-Med-Institute; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker: Medtronic; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker: Omniamed; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Endomag; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Exact Science. M.P. Lux: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: SamanTree; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: PFM; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Sysmex/Endomag. M. Banys- Paluchowski: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: pfm; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Gilead; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Seagen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Collapse