Rayhan Lal, United States of America

Stanford University Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics & Medicine
Dr. Rayhan Lal has lived with type 1 diabetes for several decades and studied electrical engineering and computer science at U.C. Berkeley. During his work in engineering his two younger sisters developed T1D and he decided to become an adult and pediatric endocrinologist. Rayhan collaborates with members of the Stanford Diabetes Research Center, industry, and open-source diabetes community to bypass the biological, technological, and human factor limitations of existing devices.

Presenter of 2 Presentations

PLENARY SESSION

Insulin Pumps

ORAL PRESENTATION SESSION

OPTIMIZING FORMULAS FOR BASAL, CARB RATIO AND SENSITIVITY FACTOR FOR PREDICTIVE CONTROLLERS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM LOOP

Abstract

Background and Aims

Rather than utilizing user-entered settings, prediction-based commercial automated insulin delivery (AID) systems calculate internal representations of basal, carbohydrate-to-insulin (CIR) ratio and/or insulin sensitivity factor (ISF) to generate estimates of future glucose. Frequently simple formulas are used that incorporate a proportionality constant and total daily dose (TDD), total daily basal or weight. In contrast, the open-source AID system Loop relies on the settings provided by users and healthcare providers. We attempt to optimize the formulas used for basal, CIR and ISF based on data from Loop users.

Methods

Utilizing data from the Loop observational study we define an “aspirational” cohort of individuals who provide complete data (³90% CGM availability), meeting the standard international consensus on Time in Range clinical targets, no time below 40mg/dL and normal BMI. We then perform fitting to the traditional equation forms utilizing TDD and test additional forms that also include age, BMI and average daily carbohydrate consumption to optimize fitting.

Results

219/743 (29%) of Loop observational study participants who had settings data met inclusion criteria for the “aspirational” cohort. When fitted to TDD alone, basal and CIR tended to be more aggressive while ISF tended to be less aggressive than the standard equations. Incorporating BMI, daily carbohydrate consumption and total daily dose provided a significantly better fit than did formulas using TDD alone.

Conclusions

The data provided in the Loop observational study allows the creation of new formulas for basal, CIR and ISF that can benefit all users of prediction-based AID.

Hide