EFFICACY OF THE DIABEO SYSTEM FOR THE PRAGMATIC TELEMEDICINE MANAGEMENT OF DIABETIC PATIENTS POORLY CONTROLLED WITH A BASAL-BOLUS INSULIN REGIMEN

Session Name
INFORMATICS IN THE SERVICE OF MEDICINE; TELEMEDICINE, SOFTWARE AND OTHER TECHNOLOGIES
Session Type
E-POSTER VIEWING (EXHIBITION HOURS)
Date
20.02.2020, Thursday
Session Time
09:30 - 15:30
Channel
E-Poster Area
Lecture Time
09:43 - 09:44
Presenter
  • Sylvia Franc, France
Authors
  • Sylvia Franc, France
  • Helene Hanaire, France
  • Pierre-Yves Benhamou, France
  • Pauline Schaepelynck, France
  • Bogdan Catargi Catargi, France
  • Anne Farret, France
  • Pierre Fontaine, France
  • Bruno Guerci, France
  • Yves Reznik, France
  • Nathalie Jeandidier, France
  • Alfred Penfornis, France
  • Sophie Borot, France
  • Lucy Chaillous, France
  • Pierre Serusclat, France
  • Yacine Kherbachi, France
  • Geneviève D'orsay, France
  • Bruno Detournay, France
  • Pierre Simon, France
  • Guillaume Charpentier, France

Abstract

Background and Aims

The DIABEO system is a telemedicine solution for real time monitoring of insulin treatment. Many people downloading a mobile health app in real-life stop using it after a single utilization. Therefore, we conducted a large pragmatic study to investigate the usage and efficacy of DIABEO in conditions close to real-life (the TELESAGE study).

Methods

Pragmatic, multicenter, randomized, open-label, three parallel-arms study in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients poorly controlled with a basal-bolus insulin regimen (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02287532). TELESAGE compared: (i) a control group (arm 1: standard care) versus the software alone (arm 2) and versus the software + telemonitoring by trained nurses (arm 3). The primary outcome evaluated HbA1c reduction after 12-month follow-up.

Results

Six-hundred-sixty-five (665) patients were included in the study. Baseline characteristics of patients were comparable among the three study groups. As expected, 25.1% participants in arm 2 and 37.6% in arm 3 used the DIABEO (± telemonitoring) system one or more times per day (DIABEO users). DIABEO users showed a significant and meaningful mean HbA1c reduction versus standard care: -0.41% for arm 2 (P = 0.001) and -0.51% for arm 3 (P ≤0.001) without significant differences in hypoglycemic incidence. In the overall population (ITT) HbA1 reduction was comparable between arms.

Conclusions

Under pragmatic conditions, the effectiveness of DIABEO in reducing HbA1c levels in poorly controlled patients depended greatly on the frequency of its use. Significant HbA1c reductions can be obtained by using DIABEO at least once a day.

Hide