Breast cancer, metastatic Proffered paper session 3 Proffered Paper session

94O - Phase Ib study of ribociclib (RIB) + letrozole (LET) in a subset of Asian patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC) (ID 1377)

Presentation Number
94O
Presentation Topic
Breast cancer, metastatic
Lecture Time
09:33 - 09:45
Speakers
  • Y. Yap
Authors
  • Y. Yap
  • Y. Ito
  • O. Bornstein
  • Y. Han
  • T. Samant
  • X. Liu
  • J. Chiu
Session Room
Hall 405, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Date
19.11.2017
Session Time
08:30 - 10:45

Abstract

Background

MONALEESASIA is an ongoing Phase Ib dose-escalation/-expansion study evaluating RIB + LET in a subset of Asian pts from Hong Kong and Singapore with HR+, HER2–ABC.

Methods

Postmenopausal pts from Hong Kong and Singapore with HR+, HER2– ABC and no prior systemic therapy for ABC received RIB (400 or 600 mg/day; 3-weeks-on/1-week-off) + LET (2.5 mg/day; continuous). Dose escalation used a Bayesian Logistic Regression Model with overdose control. The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended Phase II dose (RP2D); secondary endpoints included safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile. Blood samples for PK non-compartmental analysis were collected on Days 1 and 21 of Cycle 1 from pre-dose to 24 h post-dose.

Results

At data cut-off (Jan 16, 2017), 26 pts were enrolled (RIB 400 mg: n = 6; 600 mg: n = 20). One dose-limiting toxicity was observed at 600 mg (Grade 3 increased alanine transaminase [ALT]); the MTD/RP2D was RIB 600 mg/day (3-weeks-on/1-week-off) + LET 2.5 mg/day (continuous). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 4/6 pts at 400 mg and 17/20 pts at 600 mg during the dose-escalation and -expansion parts. The most common Grade 3/4 TRAEs (≥20% in either cohort; 400 mg vs 600 mg) were decreased neutrophil count (n = 3 vs n = 7), neutropenia (n = 1 vs n = 6), increased ALT (n = 1 vs n = 4), and increased aspartate transaminase (n = 0 vs n = 4). After a single dose (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state (Cycle 1 Day 21), absorption of both RIB and LET was rapid (Table); increases in RIB exposure were dose dependent.

Conclusions

The MTD/RP2D was declared as RIB 600 mg/day (3-weeks-on/1-week-off) + LET 2.5 mg/day (continuous) in Asian pts from Hong Kong and Singapore with HR+, HER2– ABC. Preliminary safety and PK data are consistent with prior observations in non-Asian pts.

Clinical trial identification

CLEE011A2115C/NCT02333370.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

Funding

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

Disclosure

Y-S. Yap: Received honoraria and provided consultancy for Novartis. Y. Ito: Yoshinori Ito reports grants from MSD, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Parexel, Chugai, and Lilly. O. Bornstein: Orna Bornstein is an employee of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Y. Han: Yu Han is an employee at Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. T. Samant: Tanay Samant is an employee of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and owns stocks/shares in Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. X. Liu: Xiaochun Liu is an employee of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and owns stocks in Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. J. Chiu: Dr. Chiu served on advisory boards for Novartis and Pfizer.

Summary of RIB and LET PK profiles

RIB
LET
DayDose level (mg)
Geo-mean Cmax (CV % geo-mean), ng/ml[n]Median Tmax (range), h[n]Geo-mean AUC0–24h (CV % geo-mean), h*ng/ml[n]Geo-mean T1/2, acc(CV % geo-mean), h[n]Geo-mean Cmax(CV % geo-mean), ng/ml[n]Median Tmax (range), h[n]Geo-mean AUC0–24hCV % geo-mean), h*ng/ml[n]Geo-mean T1/2, acc(CV % geo-mean), h[n]
RIBLET
Cycle 1 Day 1400 (n = 6)2.5802.0 (27.7) [6]1.02 (0.50–4.00) [6]7540.0 (25.2) [6]Not reported30.0 (30.4) [6]2.02 (0.50–4.03) [6]479.0 (13.0) [6]Not reported
600 (n = 20)2.51120.0 (45.5) [20]2.15 (1.00–6.08) [20]12,100.0 (39.5) [20]Not reported38.5 (82.8) [20]2.00 (0.50–8.05) [20]629.0 (96.7) [20]Not reported
Cycle 1 Day 21400 (n = 6)2.51390.0 (0.5) [2]1.50 (1.00–2.00) [2]15,400.0 (31.1) [2]25.1 (10.6) [2]170.0 (21.4) [2]1.00 (1.00–1.00) [2]3320.0 (28.0) [2]97.9 (25.2) [2]
600 (n = 20)2.51620.0 (15.0) [6]2.26 (2.00–4.00) [6]21,500.0 (21.0) [6]22.9 (34.8) [6]117.0 (31.0) [11]1.00 (0.50–7.88) [11]2330.0 (33.0) [11]50.6 (105.4) [11]

AUC, area under the plasma concentration-time curve; Cmax, maximum concentration;

CV % geo-mean = sqrt (exp [variance for log transformed data] – 1)*100; CV, coefficient of variation; exp, experiment;

geo-mean, geometric mean; sqrt, square root; T1/2, acc, effective accumulation half-life; T1/2, elimination half-life;

Tmax, time to reach Cmax

Collapse