Presenter of 1 Presentation
COMPARISON OF ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP AND INFECTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL ACTIVITIES AND RESOURCES BETWEEN LOW/MIDDLE AND HIGH INCOME COUNTRIES
Abstract
Background
The growth of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) worldwide has led to increased focus on antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) and infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, although primarily in high-income countries (HIC).
Aims
We aimed to compare paediatric AMS and IPC resources/activities between low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and HIC, and to determine the barriers and priorities for AMS and IPC in LMIC as assessed by clinicians in those settings.
Methods
An online questionnaire was distributed to clinicians working in HIC and LMIC healthcare facilities in 2020.
Results
Participants were from 135 healthcare settings in 39 LMIC and 27 HIC. Formal AMS and IPC programs were less frequent in LMIC than HIC settings (AMS 42% versus 76%; IPC 58% versus 89%). Only 47% of LMIC facilities conducted audits of antibiotic use for paediatric patients, with less reliable availability of World Health Organization ‘Access’ list antibiotics. Hand hygiene promotion was the most common IPC intervention in both LMIC and HIC settings (82% versus 91%), although LMIC hospitals had more limited access to reliable water supply for handwashing and antiseptic hand rub. The greatest perceived barrier to paediatric AMS and IPC in both LMIC and HIC was lack of education: only 17% of LMIC settings had regular/required education on antimicrobial prescribing, and only 25% on IPC.
Conclusions
Marked differences exist in availability of AMS and IPC resources in LMIC as compared to HIC. A collaborative international approach is urgently needed to combat AMR, using targeted strategies that address the imbalance in global AMS and IPC resource availability and activities.