ePoster Display session ePoster

3P - Determination of therapeutic effects of multifunctional micelle-based nanocarriers on breast cancer cells (ID 245)

Presentation Number
3P
Lecture Time
08:20 - 08:20
Speakers
  • Gizem T. Ulu (Izmir, Turkey)
Session Name
ePoster Display session
Room
ePoster gallery
Date
Tue, 02.03.2021
Time
08:00 - 20:00
Authors
  • Gizem T. Ulu (Izmir, Turkey)
  • Nazende N. Bayram (Kayseri, Turkey)
  • Nusaibah Abdulhadi (Izmir, Turkey)
  • Seda Gürdap (Kayseri, Turkey)
  • Alper İşoğlu (Kayseri, Turkey)
  • Sevil D. İşoğlu (Kayseri, Turkey)
  • Yusuf Baran (Izmir, Turkey)

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer is the most common and frequent cause of death in women in all types of cancer. Current treatment protocols do not provide a complete cure and targeting therapy can provide an important avenue for successful treatment of breast cancer. In this study, we aim to determine the therapeutic effects of the drug-conjugated carrier system with the conjugation of peptide sequence and antibody on HER2-positive breast cancer cells.

Methods

The selectivity of single nanocarriers were compared with doxorubicin (DOX) loaded-HER2 targeting peptide (LTVSPWY) and DOX loaded-monoclonal antibody (Herceptin®) on HER2-positive and HER2-negative breast cells. After defining the physicochemical characterization of micelle-based nanocarriers, the cytotoxic effects of micelles on healthy breast epithelial cells (MCF-10A, HER2-negative) and breast cancer cells (SKBR3- HER2-positive) were determined by MTT cell proliferation assay. Next, apoptotic and genotoxic effects of micelles (IC50 doses of DOX loaded-peptide conjugated) were determined by using JC-1 assay and Western Blotting (Bax and Bcl-2 proteins) and Commet assay, respectively. Also, drug-releasing was analyzed by flurosance microscopy with imaging processes. Lastly, cytostatic effects of micelles were investigated with cell cycle analysis.

Results

DOX loaded-HER2 targeting peptide (DOX-Pep-HER-2-NCs) and DOX loaded-monoclonal antibody micelles (DOX-Anti-HER-2-NCs) had significant differences. DOX-Pep-HER-2-NCs had more toxic effects on SKBR-3 cells than DOX-Anti-HER-2-NCs. However, there is no significant change after the application of these micelles on MCF-10A cells. Besides, the intracellular amounts of doxorubicin with the application of DOX-Pep-HER-2-NCs were detected as higher in HER-2 positive breast cancer cells after measured by fluorescence imaging. Additionally, DOX-Pep-HER-2-NCs had more apoptotic, cytostatic and genotoxic effects on HER2 overexpressed SKBR-3 cells.

Conclusions

The targeting and therapeutic efficiency of DOX-Pep-HER-2-NCs were compared to DOX-Anti-HER-2-NCs on SKBR-3 cells. DOX-Pep-HER-2-NCs was more effective than DOX-Anti-HER-2-NCs on SKBR-3 cells in terms of targeting and therapeutic effects.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Prof. Dr. Sevil Dinçer İşoğlu & Prof. Dr. Alper İşoğlu.

Funding

This project was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (1003 Project-216S991).

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Collapse