Author Of 2 Presentations
P0365 - Ocrelizumab treatment in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis: a single-center real-world experience (ID 1628)
Abstract
Background
Ocrelizumab (OCR) treatment in pivotal trials of patients (pts) with progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) has demonstrated to slow disability worsening, with a good safety profile. However, real-word data on efficacy and adverse events (AE) are still scarce.
Objectives
To provide first experience data regarding efficacy and safety of OCR use in PMS pts treated within a real-world setting.
Methods
We collected safety and efficacy data from all PMS pts treated with OCR at the MS Center of the University of Genoa. The probability of disability-, relapse- and MRI activity-free survival and NEDA-3 status was calculated with Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. AE were recorded throughout the follow-up (FU).
Results
We recorded data from 59 PMS pts [42 (71%) with primary-progressive (PP) MS and 17 (29%) with secondary progressive (SP) MS, 24 females (41), mean (SD) age 49.8 (8.2) years] with a mean disease duration (DD) of 12.1 (10.1) years, a median (IQR) baseline EDSS of 5.5 (3.5-6.0) and median number of previous DMTs 1 (0-2). SPMS patients had longer DD (20.8vs8.6; p=0.004) and had mean ARR of 0.24 (0.4). 21 (36%) pts had not received any DMT prior to OCR. Mean FU was 2.0 (1.1) years. 14 (24%) patients had an active MRI brain scan at baseline. At 1-year FU, MRI-inflammatory-activity-free survival was 87.3% (CI95%: 76.9-97.7%), relapse-free survival was 100% and progression-free survival was 82.7% (72.3-93.1%). NEDA-3 status was achieved in 72.3% (59.0-85.5%) of pts. No differences were noted between patients with PP and SPMS. At multivariate analyses, no baseline characteristic was found be predictive of a higher probability of progression-free survival, MRI-activity-free survival and NEDA-3 status. We recorded 69 AE in 36 pts (32 upper respiratory tract infections; 6 herpes simplex-1 reactivation; 7 lower urinary tract infections; 1 acute myeloid leukemia following myelodysplastic syndrome; 1 appendicitis treated with surgical procedure). No serious infusion-associated reactions were reported.
Conclusions
We report short-medium term efficacy data in a real-world population of progressive patients treated with OCR, including a relatively high proportion of patients without MRI activity at baseline assessment. Our data suggest that OCR should be considered as treatment option in both patients with PPMS and SPMS.
P0410 - Treatment with ocrelizumab during Sars-Cov2 pandemic: efficacy and safety outcomes (ID 1787)
Abstract
Background
Sars-Cov2 pandemic led neurologists to modify the therapeutic approach in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) care setting, especially with regard to immunodepleting treatments.
Objectives
to describe management and outcome of MS patients (pts) treated with ocrelizumab (OCR) during Sars-Cov2 pandemic in the MS Center of University of Genoa.
Methods
we collected data about pts scheduled to undergo OCR infusion from 1st March to 30th June 2020. Pts that previously underwent the first OCR infusion completed the induction cycle. No further OCR cycles during March and April 2020 were performed. Starting from May, we adopted an infusion scheme based on B-cell repopulation, differently applied for Relapsing Remitting (RR) and Progressive (P) pts. RRMS pts performed immunophenotype (IF) and received OCR infusion when B CD19+ cell count overcame the cut-off of 1%. Conversely, for PMS pts OCR infusions were delayed for 3 months. Then, PMS pts underwent OCR infusion based on B CD19+ cell monitoring. For pts with evidence of B CD19+ cells repopulation brain 3T MRI was planned before OCR re-infusion.
Results
77 MS pts were included [45 (58%) RRMS, 32 (41%) PMS; mean age 44.7 (SD: 11.1) years, mean disease duration 21.7 (22.3) years, mean number of previous DMT before OCR: 1.6 (1.6), mean number of previous OCR infusions 3.9 (SD 2.3). 11 (13.1%, 9 RR, 2 PP) of the 49 pts that performed a first IF presented B CD19+ cell repopulation and received OCR re-infusion, with a mean delay from scheduled infusion of 70 (48.9) days. The mean number of previous OCR infusions was 3.0 (1.2) and 3.1 (1.6) for pts with and without evidence of B-cell repopulation respectively. No effect of previous OCR infusions number on the probability to develop B CD19+ cell repopulation at the first IF was detected by ANCOVA analysis, correcting for the delay between the date of scheduled infusion and the date in which the first IF has been performed. Considering the global cohort, 1 pt presented a dubious sensory relapse with no evidence of radiological activity. None of the pts who performed brain MRI before OCR re-infusion showed new T2 or Gd+ enhancing lesions. 3 pts were infected by Sars-Cov2; 2 of them needed hospitalization but recovered completely.
Conclusions
the management of patients treated with OCR during Sars-Cov2 pandemic with a personalized infusion protocol based on B CD19+ cells repopulation was associated with good results in terms of efficacy and safety outcome