Background

NMOSD is an autoimmune disorder characterized by acute, unpredictable relapses that result in accumulating disability. Satralizumab, a humanized, monoclonal recycling antibody that targets the interleukin-6 receptor, reduced relapse frequency and had a favourable safety profile vs placebo in two randomized, phase 3 clinical trials: SAkuraSky (satralizumab in combination with baseline immunosuppressants; NCT02028884), and SAkuraStar (satralizumab monotherapy; NCT02073279).

Objectives

To assess the impact of satralizumab on relapse severity in patients with NMOSD.

Methods

Patients in the SAkura studies received satralizumab 120mg or placebo at Weeks 0, 2, 4, and Q4W thereafter. This analysis was performed using data from the pooled intention-to-treat population across the double-blind periods of both studies. We assessed the severity of protocol-defined relapses (PDRs) by comparing patients’ Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score at PDR vs their score prior to relapse (last scheduled study visit). A similar analysis on optic neuritis PDRs was performed using visual Functional Systems Score (FSS). A PDR was categorised as severe if it resulted in a change of ≥2 points on the EDSS or visual FSS (optic neuritis analysis). Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to assess time to first severe PDR. Additionally, the number of patients receiving acute therapy for any relapse was compared between treatment groups.

Results

Overall, 178 patients were included in the analyses. In the satralizumab group, 27 of 104 patients (26%) experienced a PDR vs 34 of 74 patients (46%) in the placebo group. The proportion of PDRs that were severe was lower in patients receiving satralizumab vs placebo (5 of 27 events [19%] vs 12 of 34 events [35%]). Similarly, the proportion of optic neuritis PDRs that were severe was lower in patients receiving satralizumab vs placebo (2 of 8 events [25%] vs 5 of 13 events [39%]). Across all patients, there was a 79% reduction in severe PDR risk with satralizumab vs placebo (hazard ratio [95% CI]; 0.21 [0.07–0.61]; p=0.002). A lower proportion of patients receiving satralizumab were prescribed acute relapse therapy vs placebo (38% vs 58%; odds ratio [95% CI] 0.46 [0.25–0.86], p=0.015).

Conclusions

Patients treated with satralizumab had a lower risk of severe relapse, and were less likely to receive acute relapse therapy compared with placebo. The number of patients with severe PDRs was low, so results should be interpreted with caution.

Background

Intrathecal production of immunoglobulin (Ig) and the presence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)–specific oligoclonal bands (OCBs) are hallmarks of multiple sclerosis (MS) that persist throughout the disease course and treatment.

Objectives

To describe baseline (BL) correlations of CSF IgM and IgG production with CSF biomarkers and to assess the pharmacodynamic effects of ocrelizumab (OCR) treatment on these parameters in patients with relapsing MS (RMS) from the Ocrelizumab Biomarker Outcome Evaluation (OBOE) study (NCT02688985).

Methods

Seventy-nine of 100 total patients with RMS had available BL CSF samples for assessment of IgG OCBs, IgG and IgM (measured at University Medical Center Göttingen), with demographic, MRI and clinical parameters representative of the total RMS population. CSF samples at either 12 (n=22), 24 (n=24) or 52 (n=17) weeks postdose and from a 12-week reference arm (no OCR; n=16) were assessed for longitudinal changes.

Results

Median (interquartile range [IQR]) CSF levels at BL were as follows: IgG index, 0.79 (0.63–1.28); IgM index, 0.19 (0.11–0.33); CD3⁺ T cell number, 2.52 (0.80–5.61) cells/µL; CXCL13, 9.89 (3.91–31.50) pg/mL; CCL19, 47.95 (31.09–70.86) pg/mL; neurofilament light chain (NfL) 1280.0 (828.1–2968.9) pg/mL. At BL, IgG index and IgM index correlated moderately with levels of B cells (r=0.65, r=0.4 respectively), T cells (r=0.54, r=0.3 respectively) and CXCL13 (r=0.58, r=0.43 respectively), but not CCL19 or NfL. IgG index tended to decrease with OCR treatment and was significantly reduced by 52 weeks (n=17/79; median [IQR] change from BL −9.5% [−20.4% to −0.1%]; p<0.02) compared with stable levels in the reference arm. While IgG OCBs were detected at BL in all patients, IgG OCBs tended to decrease with OCR treatment, with three of 17 patients having no detectable IgG OCBs at 52 weeks. Reductions in IgM index were not observed with OCR treatment.

Conclusions

Baseline CSF levels of B cells, T cells and CXCL13 correlated with IgG index and to a lesser degree IgM index in patients with RMS from the OBOE study. Significant reductions were observed in IgG index with OCR treatment, along with a trend toward reduced OCBs, with three patients showing no detectable OCBs. These data suggest that OCR impacts CSF Ig production, a hallmark of MS not previously thought to be affected by B-cell depletion therapy. These 1-year observations need to be confirmed with longer-term data and correlated with clinical response.

Background

Satralizumab, a humanized, monoclonal recycling antibody that targets the interleukin-6 receptor, reduced patients’ risk of NMOSD relapse in the double-blind (DB) periods of two randomized, phase 3 clinical trials in NMOSD: SAkuraSky (satralizumab in combination with baseline immunosuppressants; NCT02028884), and SAkuraStar (satralizumab monotherapy; NCT02073279).

Objectives

To assess the efficacy of satralizumab over a longer period of treatment, using data from the SAkura studies’ open-label extension (OLE) periods.

Methods

Patients entering SAkuraSky/Star were randomized to receive satralizumab 120mg or placebo at Weeks 0, 2, 4, and Q4W thereafter. After completing the DB period or experiencing a relapse, patients could enter the OLE period (same satralizumab dosing as DB period). The primary endpoint of both studies was time to first protocol-defined relapse (PDR) in the DB period, adjudicated by a Clinical Endpoint Committee (CEC). In this analysis, which includes OLE data (CEC adjudication unavailable), we assessed time to first investigator-reported PDR (any relapse considered by the investigator to meet PDR criteria) in the combined DB+OLE periods, using a pooled population from both studies.

Results

Overall, 179 patients were randomized to treatment (satralizumab n=105; placebo n=74), of whom 166 received ≥1 dose of satralizumab in the combined DB+OLE period. The median (range) satralizumab exposure in the DB period was 96.1 (8–224) weeks, and in the combined DB+OLE was 131.9 (13–276) weeks.

In the combined DB+OLE, patients originally randomized to satralizumab had a 51% lower risk of investigator-reported PDR vs those originally randomized to placebo (HR [95% CI] 0.49 [0.31–0.79]; P=0.002); the risk reduction was more pronounced in AQP4-IgG seropositive patients (66% risk reduction; HR [95% CI] 0.34 [0.19–0.62]; P<0.001). Patients who switched from placebo to satralizumab upon entry into the OLE period were included in the placebo group for this analysis, which likely reduced the observed treatment difference between satralizumab and placebo compared with the DB period.

No patients randomized to satralizumab withdrew from the OLE period due to a relapse, vs four patients who were originally randomized to placebo. The safety profile of satralizumab in the OLE was consistent with the DB period.

Conclusions

Across the DB and OLE periods of the SAkura studies, patients randomized to satralizumab had a significantly reduced risk of relapse vs placebo.

Background

Patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) may experience severe disability after their incident (first) attack, with disability accumulating with subsequent relapses. Satralizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits the interleukin-6 receptor, reduced relapse frequency and had a favorable safety profile vs placebo in two randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trials in patients with NMOSD: SAkuraSky (satralizumab in combination with baseline immunosuppressants; NCT02028884), and SAkuraStar (satralizumab monotherapy; NCT02073279).

Objectives

To review a case series of treatment-naïve, aquaporin-4-IgG seropositive (AQP4-IgG+) NMOSD patients who enrolled in SAkuraStar following their incident attack.

Methods

All instances of investigator-reported relapse were assessed in six treatment-naïve, AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD patients enrolled in SAkuraStar after their first attack. Relapses that met protocol-defined relapse (PDR) criteria are specified. Patients who experienced a PDR or remained in SAkuraStar when the double-blind period ended were eligible to enter the open-label extension (OLE). Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores were recorded at regular intervals and at relapse.

Results

Of the six enrolled patients, two were randomized to placebo, and four to satralizumab. Demographic characteristics in these six patients were generally consistent with the overall SAkuraStar population. One of the two patients who received placebo experienced a PDR on Study Day 21, with a 1.5-point increase in EDSS score, and fully recovered to pre-relapse EDSS score. Two of the four patients who received satralizumab experienced a relapse. The first patient experienced a PDR on Study Day 214, with a 1-point increase in EDSS, and the second patient experienced a relapse (not meeting PDR criteria) on Study Day 458, with a 0.5-point increase in EDSS score. Both patients fully recovered to pre-relapse EDSS score.

Five of six patients continued in the ongoing OLE, and no further relapses were reported (up to March 2020). Safety outcomes were consistent with the overall SAkuraStar safety population.

Conclusions

Treatment-naïve AQP4-IgG+ patients enrolled in SAkuraStar after their incident attack and randomized to placebo experienced a relapse earlier than those randomized to satralizumab. All patients fully recovered to pre-relapse EDSS score. Interpretation is limited due to the small sample size.