Clinical Outcome Measures Poster Presentation

P0021 - A propensity-matched comparison of long-term disability progression in MS patients treated with dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod (ID 709)

Speakers
  • R. Fox
Authors
  • R. Fox
  • S. Lancia
  • G. Cutter
  • R. Marrie
  • J. Mendoza
  • J. Lewin
  • A. Salter
Presentation Number
P0021
Presentation Topic
Clinical Outcome Measures

Abstract

Background

Previous comparative effectiveness studies in multiple sclerosis (MS) have shown similar efficacy between dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and fingolimod (FTY) on measures of inflammatory disease activity but most studies did not assess long-term disability.

Objectives

To compare long-term disability progression over 5 years (yrs), as assessed by Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS), in NARCOMS registry participants (pts) treated with DMF or FTY.

Methods

The NARCOMS registry is a voluntary self-report registry of people with MS. Pts provide health-related information at enrollment and every 6 months thereafter. We identified pts with RRMS; living in the US; and initiating index DMT (DMF or FTY) from Spring 2011 through Spring 2018. Pts were included if they had ≥1 yr follow-up on index DMT. DMF pts treated with prior FTY, and FTY pts treated with prior DMF, were excluded. We used 1:1 propensity-score matching (PSM) to match FTY to DMF pts. Baseline factors (at time of index DMT initiation) used for PSM were age, disease duration, sex, number of prior DMTs, education, PDDS, cognition score, depression score, relapses in last 6 months, and cardiovascular comorbidities. Time to 6-month confirmed disability progression (≥1-point increase on PDDS sustained for ≥6 months) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a Cox proportional hazards regression model with robust sandwich estimators. Pts were censored at last follow-up or at the time of DMT discontinuation.

Results

Overall, 689 DMF and 565 FTY pts were included. After PSM, 468 DMF pts were matched with 468 FTY pts. The survey compliance was high in both groups, with >93% of pts in both groups completing ≥50% of surveys while on treatment. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced after PSM, with standardized differences <0.1 for each covariate. Median treatment duration was 3.0 yrs for DMF and 4.0 yrs for FTY. At 5 yrs, 68.3% (95% CI: 62.4-73.5) of DMF pts and 63.3% (95% CI: 59.6-70.1) of FTY pts were free from 6-month confirmed PDDS progression (hazard ratio: 1.01 [95% CI: 0.79-1.28]; p=0.95).

Conclusions

In this propensity-matched analysis of MS pts from the NARCOMS registry, there was no significant difference between DMF and FTY on confirmed disability (PDDS) progression over 5 yrs. These results are consistent with previous studies that have shown similar effectiveness between DMF and FTY on relapse and MRI outcomes.

Supported by: Biogen; NARCOMS is a project of the CMSC

Collapse