M. Tintore

Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia Neurology Neuroimmunology

Mar Tintoré, MD, PhD, serves as the clinical Coordinator of neurology in the Neurology-Neuroimmunology Department at the Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat) at the Hospital Vall d’Hebron in Barcelona, Spain. The Cemcat conducts clinical and basic research on MS and neuroimmunology to aid people living with MS. Dr. Tintoré serves on the Clinical Ethics Committee of the Vall d'Hebron University Hospital. Dr. Tintoré received her medical degree and PhD from the Universitat Autònoma in Barcelona. Her PhD thesis was on antiendothelial cell antibodies in patients with MS. She completed her neurology residency at the University Hospital Vall d'Hebron and served as a deputy emergency physician at Vall d'Hebron University General Hospital in Barcelona. Dr. Tintoré’s research interests include the initial presentation of demyelinating events, prognostic factors, pediatric MS, the gender aspects of MS, and treatment of the disease. Dr. Tintoré has authored or co-authored over 250 articles in peer-reviewed journals and has an h-index of 51. She is editor for Multiple Sclerosis Journal – Experimental, Translational and Clinical. She is currently the secretary of "European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis" (ECTRIMS).

Author Of 3 Presentations

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life Oral Presentation

FC03.01 - Defining controversies of benign MS using digital technology

Speakers
Presentation Number
FC03.01
Presentation Topic
Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life
Lecture Time
13:00 - 13:12

Abstract

Background

Multiple-Sclerosis-Partners-Advancing-Technology-Health-Solutions (MSPATHS) is an international multicentre digital database that collects clinical information provided directly by patients together with standardized MRI and biomarkers.

Objectives

We identify a Benign multiple sclerosis (BMS) population using Patient-Determined-Disease-Steps (PDDS) as a proxy for EDSS. We describe its physical and non-physical characteristics, and explore the features that best discriminate BMS.

Methods

Cross-sectional study of MSPATHS patients (Feb 2019). In patients with disease duration ≥10 years, BMS was considered when PDDS score<2. We compared BMS and non-BMS in terms of (1)socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, (2)physical status (lower and upper extremity function by Neuro-QoL (LUEF-NQ) and neurological performance tests: walking speed test (WST), manual dexterity test (MDT), processing speed test (PST), contrast sensitivity test (CST)) and non-physical symptoms (anxiety, depression, fatigue, among other NQ domains), and (3)MRI (gadolinium enhancement and new T2 lesions). We built a random forest model to estimate the importance of each variable. Cohen’s d was used for descriptive statistics to categorize differences in small (d=0.2-0.5), medium (d=0.5-0.8) and large (d>0.8). A sensitivity analysis with a 1:1 matched cohort by disease duration was performed.

Results

From 15,257 patients included, 8,349 had a disease duration ≥10 years and 3,852 (46.1%) were classified as BMS. (1)BMS and non-BMS patients were similar for gender, age at disease onset and diagnosis, ethnicity, years of education and smoking status. Compared to non-BMS, BMS had small differences in disease duration (median, 17.2 (12,9-23,4) vs. 20.9 (15,1-28,8 years); d=0.39) but medium/large differences in (2)physical status (LUEF-NQ d=2.06 and 1.53, WST d=0.81, MDT d=0.97, PST d=0.82 and CST d=0.56), as well as, in all non-physical symptoms evaluated by NQ (anxiety d=0.53, depression d=0.69, fatigue d=0.84, stigma d=1.32, cognition d=0.69, social role satisfaction (SRS) d=1.11 and participation (SRP) d=1.19). (3)No differences were found on MRI activity. With 0.88 sensitivity and 0.86 specificity, LUEF-NQ was the most contributing variable for the random forest followed by stigma, SRP, WST, and SRS. The sensitivity analysis showed similar results.

Conclusions

PDDS seems to be a useful disability proxy to identify BMS when using digital technology. LUEF-NQ, stigma, SRP and SRS seem to better discriminate BMS.

Collapse
Disease Modifying Therapies – Risk Management Oral Presentation

PS01.05 - Rituximab treatment for MS: an observational multicentric dose comparison

Abstract

Background

Rituximab (RTX) is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, widely used as an off-label treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS). Despite well-known efficacy and safety, RTX regimen has not yet been standardized.

Objectives

We aimed to compare efficacy and safety data of two different rituximab doses at two large Catalan multiple sclerosis centres.

Methods

A two-centre ambispective study considering all MS patients that have received at least one RTX cycle until February 2020 was conducted. In Barcelona centre (BC), RTX regimen used was 2g intravenously (IV), at least during 3 cycles, followed by 1g every 6 months, while in Girona centre (GC), was 2g IV, at least the first cycle, followed by 500mg every 6 months. Patients were clinically followed every 6 months with lab tests, and brain MRI scans were performed at baseline and yearly thereafter. Baseline clinical, radiological and demographic characteristics were collected. Annual relapse rate (ARR), contrast-enhancing lesions (CELs) and new T2 lesions at one and third year on treatment, as well as EDSS changes at last follow-up visit, were evaluated. Also, the dynamics of CD19% lymphocytes and IG immunoglobulin (IgG) values in serum, as well as the incidence of adverse events (AE) were described.

Results

A total of 303 patients (249 at BC and 54 at GC) were included. Main reason to start RTX was clinical progression plus inflammatory activity (clinical, radiological or both) (45.8% BC vs 79.6% GC). No differences on age at RTX onset, gender and disease duration were found between both centres. At baseline, mean ARR was 0.37±0.6 (BC) vs. 0.33±0.5 (GC); median EDSS was 5.5 (1-9.0) (BC) vs. 6.0 (1-8.0) (GC); and proportion of MRI with CELs was 32.4% (BC) vs. 42.6% (GC). ARR decrease to 0.05 (87.5%, p<0.001) for BC vs. 0.03 (90.3%, p=0.018) for GC at first year, and to 0.08 (88.3%, p=0.016) vs. 0 (100%, p=0.172) at third year. Considering only progressive MS phenotypes, 79.4% vs. 71.4% of patients remained stable or improved the EDSS. Regarding MRI findings, percentages of patients with CELs and new T2 lesions (BC vs GC) were 2.7% vs. 8% and 19% vs. 16% at one year; and 0% vs. 0% and 12% vs. 0% at third year. AE incidence was higher at BC during the first year (14.8% vs 4.1%). No difference in the dynamics of CD19% lymphocytes was found, while IgG values decreased significantly in the BC cohort throughout the first 3 years.

Conclusions

In the treatment of multiple sclerosis, low doses of rituximab seem to offer similar effectiveness with better safety profile than high doses.

Collapse
Neuromyelitis Optica and Anti-MOG Disease Oral Presentation

YI02.04 - Comparison of clinical characterization, risk of relapses and antibody dynamics between children and adults with MOGAD

Abstract

Background

To predict the clinical course of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-antibody (Ab)-associated disease (MOGAD) is essential to guide treatment recommendations.

Objectives

We aimed to 1) compare clinical features and disease course, and 2) to evaluate the association of MOG-Ab dynamics and relapses, between children and adults with MOGAD.

Methods

Retrospective study evaluating clinical features of 98 children and 266 adults with MOGAD, between January 2014 and September 2019. To analyse relapses over the whole disease course, a Cox regression analysis for recurrent time-to-event data was performed, introducing treatment as time-dependent covariate. To evaluate dynamics, delta mean fluorescence intensity ratio signal (ΔMFIratio) of MOG-Ab was measured in patients with a minimum time elapsed between two samples of 4 months.

Results

Median age at onset of symptoms was 10.9 (interquartile range 5.4-14.3) years in children and 36.2 (27.7-47.6) in adults. Isolated optic neuritis was the most frequent clinical presentation both in children (40.8%) and adults (55.9%), p=0.013, and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis syndrome was more frequent in children (36.7% vs. 5.6%; p<0.001). Compared to adults, children displayed a better recovery (EDSS ≥3.0 at last follow-up reached only by 10 of 97 [10.3%] vs. 66/247 [26.7%], p<0.001).

In the multivariate analysis, adults were at higher risk of relapse than children (Hazard ratio 1.41, 95%Confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.78; p=0.003). Among the 124 participants evaluated for MOG-Ab dynamics, 36.3% became seronegative, 60.5% decrease and 3.2% increase the ΔMFIratio. At two years, 64.2% (95%CI 40.9-86.5) of non-relapsing children became MOG-Ab negative compared to 14.1% (95%CI 4.7-38.3) of relapsing ones, log-rank p<0.001, with no differences observed between non-relapsing and relapsing adults, log-rank p=0.280.

Conclusions

MOGAD differs in its clinical presentation at onset, showing a progressive shift in the clinical features across age-groups. Compared to children, adults have a higher risk of relapses and a worse functional recovery. Finally, children with monophasic disease became MOG-Ab negative earlier than relapsing ones, but not in adults. Considering these differences, management and treatment guidelines should be considered independently in children and adults.

Collapse