M. Watanabe

Kyushu University Neurology

Author Of 2 Presentations

Biomarkers and Bioinformatics Late Breaking Abstracts

LB01.03 - Neutrophil granulocyte markers in cerebrospinal fluid differentiate NMOSD and anti-MOG antibody associated disease from MS in acute disease phase

Speakers
Presentation Number
LB01.03
Presentation Topic
Biomarkers and Bioinformatics
Lecture Time
09:24 - 09:36

Abstract

Background

Background
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), anti-MOG-antibody associated disease (MOGAD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) may be difficult to differentiate. Detection of antibodies (Ab) targeting AQP4 and MOG is the diagnostic gold standard for the former two diseases, but has limited sensitivity and long laboratory turnaround time. Neutrophil granulocyte (NG) invasion of brain tissue is a key differentiator of NMOSD from MS, and has also been described in MOGAD.

Objectives

Objectives
To examine the capability to differentiate NMOSD/MOGAD from MS by the profile of secreted primary (elastase (Ela); myeloperoxidase (MPO)) and secondary (matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8); neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL)) neutrophil granule products in CSF.

Methods

Methods
CSF from patients with NMOSD (n=42), MOGAD (n=6) and RRMS (n=41) were evaluated for Ela, MPO, MMP-8, NGAL, and compared with markers of neuronal (NfL) and astrocyte (GFAP, S100B) damage by conventional ELISA or single molecule array assay. CSFs from healthy controls (HC) (n=25) served as reference. The association between biomarkers and disease groups was assessed in linear models. The kinetic change of biomarkers in function of time since last relapse was modelled across disease groups. ROC curves and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to estimate the potential to differentiate NMOSD/MOGAD from RRMS in acute disease phase (≤20 days after relapse), as well as between acute NMOSD and MOGAD. The association of biomarkers with EDSS in acute NMOSD and RRMS was assessed by linear models and Spearman correlation.

Results

Results
All disease groups had elevated NfL vs HC (p<0.01), while GFAP levels were increased only in NMOSD (p<0.01). In acute NMOSD, all 4 NG markers were increased vs HC and acute RRMS (all p<0.01). In MOGAD, Ela, MPO and MMP-8 were increased vs HC (p<0.025) and acute RRMS (p<0.04). AUC in ROC analyses comparing acute NMOSD/MOGAD vs acute RRMS was high (Ela and NGAL: 0.91; MPO: 0.82; MMP-8: 0.81). In acute NMOSD, S100B and GFAP levels were increased in 89% (AUC=0.82) and 83% (AUC=0.80) of patients, respectively, vs median values of MOGAD. In acute NMOSD, EDSS scores correlated with all 4 NG markers (all p<0.01), and GFAP (p<0.031), but not with NfL and S100B (both p=0.21).

Conclusions

Conclusion
NG-specific biomarkers correlate with current EDSS scores in NMOSD. They show high sensitivity and specificity for rapid differentiation of acute NMOSD and MOGAD vs RRMS, similar to those reported for Ab against AQP4 and MOG. As the 4 NG biomarkers can be measured within few hours, as compared to an up to 2-week turnaround time for gold-standard cell-based assays for AQP4 and MOG, they could support individual decision making for acute therapeutic intervention. Further, increased S100B and GFAP levels differentiate acute NMOSD from MOGAD. NG markers may have a role in the diagnosis of Ab-negative NMOSD.

Collapse
Biomarkers and Bioinformatics Oral Presentation

PS03.04 - Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein, but not S100B or neurofilament light chain predicts future relapses in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

Speakers
Presentation Number
PS03.04
Presentation Topic
Biomarkers and Bioinformatics
Lecture Time
11:09 - 11:21

Abstract

Background

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are autoimmune mediated astrocytopathies. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and S100B, two astrocyte specific, and neurofilament light chain (NfL), a neuron specific biomarker are reported to be elevated in CSF and serum or plasma in acute phases of NMOSD. Serum NfL is a predictor of relapse activity in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, whether serum levels of NfL (sNfL), GFAP (sGFAP) or S100B (sS100B) levels can be prognostic biomarkers for future acute disease activity in NMOSD has not been elucidated.

Objectives

To test the prognostic potential of sGFAP, sS100B and sNfL levels during remission phase as biomarker for future relapses in NMOSD with aquaporin-4-IgG.

Methods

Median values of sGFAP, sS100B and sNfL were calculated from 47 serum samples from 18 patients in remission (>180 days after last relapse), followed for up to 10 years, and marked cut-off levels for “high” and “low” sGFAP (141.6 pg/mL), sS100B (8.6 pg/mL), and sNfL (33.9 pg/mL), respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis, univariable and a multivariable (adjusted for age, sex, time from recent relapse and treatment) Cox-hazard model were used to compare the time to and hazard risk of the next relapse between the high and low groups for all three markers.

Results

Twenty-five first post-relapse/remission phase samples from these 18 patients (11 had one relapse, 7 had two relapses) were selected for analyses. Patients in the high sGFAP group experienced future relapses earlier than those with low sGFAP levels (median 3710 versus 922 days, p = 0.0047) and had higher risk of future relapses (unadjusted hazard ratio (HR): 5.6 [95% CI 1.5–21.0], p = 0.010; adjusted hazard ratio: 9.5 [95% CI 1.9–47.0], p = 0.0061). In contrast, high sS100B and sNfL levels were unable to identify patients at increased risk for relapses.

Conclusions

We illustrate the prognostic capacity of an astrocyte specific marker, sGFAP, for future relapses in stable NMOSD. This further supports the value of this blood biomarker for potential future clinical application in guiding and monitoring treatment response of patients with NMOSD. The failure of sNfL as a neuronal marker in this capacity for NMOSD may reflect the pathogenetic differences between this disease and MS. The failure of sS100B may result from its pharmacokinetic profile as a short-lived marker in acute NMOSD, but not in stable disease.

Collapse

Presenter Of 1 Presentation

Biomarkers and Bioinformatics Oral Presentation

PS03.04 - Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein, but not S100B or neurofilament light chain predicts future relapses in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

Speakers
Presentation Number
PS03.04
Presentation Topic
Biomarkers and Bioinformatics
Lecture Time
11:09 - 11:21

Abstract

Background

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are autoimmune mediated astrocytopathies. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and S100B, two astrocyte specific, and neurofilament light chain (NfL), a neuron specific biomarker are reported to be elevated in CSF and serum or plasma in acute phases of NMOSD. Serum NfL is a predictor of relapse activity in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, whether serum levels of NfL (sNfL), GFAP (sGFAP) or S100B (sS100B) levels can be prognostic biomarkers for future acute disease activity in NMOSD has not been elucidated.

Objectives

To test the prognostic potential of sGFAP, sS100B and sNfL levels during remission phase as biomarker for future relapses in NMOSD with aquaporin-4-IgG.

Methods

Median values of sGFAP, sS100B and sNfL were calculated from 47 serum samples from 18 patients in remission (>180 days after last relapse), followed for up to 10 years, and marked cut-off levels for “high” and “low” sGFAP (141.6 pg/mL), sS100B (8.6 pg/mL), and sNfL (33.9 pg/mL), respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis, univariable and a multivariable (adjusted for age, sex, time from recent relapse and treatment) Cox-hazard model were used to compare the time to and hazard risk of the next relapse between the high and low groups for all three markers.

Results

Twenty-five first post-relapse/remission phase samples from these 18 patients (11 had one relapse, 7 had two relapses) were selected for analyses. Patients in the high sGFAP group experienced future relapses earlier than those with low sGFAP levels (median 3710 versus 922 days, p = 0.0047) and had higher risk of future relapses (unadjusted hazard ratio (HR): 5.6 [95% CI 1.5–21.0], p = 0.010; adjusted hazard ratio: 9.5 [95% CI 1.9–47.0], p = 0.0061). In contrast, high sS100B and sNfL levels were unable to identify patients at increased risk for relapses.

Conclusions

We illustrate the prognostic capacity of an astrocyte specific marker, sGFAP, for future relapses in stable NMOSD. This further supports the value of this blood biomarker for potential future clinical application in guiding and monitoring treatment response of patients with NMOSD. The failure of sNfL as a neuronal marker in this capacity for NMOSD may reflect the pathogenetic differences between this disease and MS. The failure of sS100B may result from its pharmacokinetic profile as a short-lived marker in acute NMOSD, but not in stable disease.

Collapse