Endometrial cancer

22P - A Comparison of New ESGO-ESTRO-ESP Endometrial Risk classification With Previous Classification in predicting outcome

Presentation Number
22P
Speakers
  • Aparna M. Prakasan (Thiruvananthapuram, India)
Authors
  • Aparna M. Prakasan (Thiruvananthapuram, India)
  • Jagathnath Krishna (Thiruvananthapuram, India)
  • Aswin Kumar (Thiruvananthapuram, Ke, India)
  • Susan Mathews (Thiruvananthapuram, India)
  • Suchetha Sambasivan (Thiruvananthapuram, India)
  • John Joseph (Thiruvananthapuram, India)
  • Francis V. James (Thiruvananthapuram, Ke, India)
Presentation Topic
Endometrial cancer

Abstract

Background

The new ESGO-ESTRO-ESP 2020 risk classification system (molecular classification unknown) has allocated fewer patients to the high-risk group compared to the previous risk stratification system in 2016. The study aims to clinically validate the new system in predicting the outcome compared to the previous one.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 684 patients treated between 2009 and 2013 for carcinoma endometrium in a tertiary care oncology center. The three years overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) estimates were generated independently using the Kaplan Meier method for the new and previous classification system. Akaike information criterion and concordance index was calculated between both staging systems to identify better predictive model.

Results

After re-classification, 43% of patients in the high-risk group based on the 2016 system are shifted to the high-intermediate group and 93% of patients migrated from the high-intermediate to intermediate-risk group (Table). The 3-year OS for low risk, intermediate risk, high intermediate risk, high risk, and advanced patients according to the 2016 risk stratification system was 98.3%,95.7%,98%,90.1%, and 64.2% respectively and was 98.3%, 96.6%,92.9%,88.9% and 61.3% respectively according to the 2020 system. The 3-year DFS was 97.9%,79.3%,88.9%,77.3% and 57.2% according to the 2016 system and 97.9%,83%,85.3%,72.2% and 53.8% respectively with the 2020 system. The survival rate decreased from low to advanced risk groups and the newer high-risk group has a lower survival rate than the previous one. The Akaike Information Criterion was lower (0.685 versus 0.702) and Concordance Index values were better (1566.661 versus1545.505) for ESGO 2020 system for DFS, indicating that the newer edition gives a better predictive model

ESGO 2016 and ESGO-2020 cross-tabulation

ESGO-2020 Total
Low Intermediate High- Intermediate High Advanced
ESGO 2016 Low 216 0 0 0 0 216
Intermediate 0 81 0 0 0 81
High-Intermediate 0 54 4 0 0 58
High 0 1 124 158 0 283
Advanced 0 0 0 2 44 46
Total 216 136 128 160 44 684
.

Conclusions

The new 2020 risk stratification appears better predictive of survival events.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Institutional Review Board, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Collapse