PREDICTION OF HAEMORRHAGIC TRANSFORMATION BY BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER PERMEABILITY - IS TENECTEPLASE SAFER THAN ALTEPLASE? (ID 649)

Presentation Topic
AS05 THROMBOLYSIS – EXCLUDING CLINICAL TRIAL RESULTS
Е-Poster Audio MP3
My link to connect
Ammad Mahmood is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Topic: PREDICTION OF HAEMORRHAGIC TRANSFORMATION BY BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER PERMEABILITY - IS TENECTEPLASE SAFER THAN ALTEPLASE? Time: Sep 1, 2021 12:30 PM London Join Zoom Meeting https://uofglasgow.zoom.us/j/98013704891 Meeting ID: 980 1370 4891 One tap mobile +442039017895,,98013704891# The United Kingdom +442080806591,,98013704891# The United Kingdom Dial by your location +44 203 901 7895 The United Kingdom +44 208 080 6591 The United Kingdom +44 208 080 6592 The United Kingdom +44 330 088 5830 The United Kingdom +44 131 460 1196 The United Kingdom +44 203 481 5237 The United Kingdom +44 203 481 5240 The United Kingdom Meeting ID: 980 1370 4891 Find your local number: https://uofglasgow.zoom.us/u/aetdARyRw6 Join by SIP 98013704891@zoomcrc.com Join by H.323 162.255.37.11 (US West) 162.255.36.11 (US East) 115.114.131.7 (India Mumbai) 115.114.115.7 (India Hyderabad) 213.19.144.110 (Amsterdam Netherlands) 213.244.140.110 (Germany) 103.122.166.55 (Australia Sydney) 103.122.167.55 (Australia Melbourne) 149.137.40.110 (Singapore) 64.211.144.160 (Brazil) 149.137.68.253 (Mexico) 69.174.57.160 (Canada Toronto) 65.39.152.160 (Canada Vancouver) 207.226.132.110 (Japan Tokyo) 149.137.24.110 (Japan Osaka) Meeting ID: 980 1370 4891
Availability
1st Sept 2021 1330-1430 CEST (1230-1330 UK time)

Abstract

Background And Aims

Haemorrhagic transformation (HT) following thrombolysis is associated with poorer outcome. Measures of blood brain barrier permeability, such as extraction fraction, predict HT. We investigated whether HT incidence, accounting for extraction fraction, differed among acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients treated with alteplase or tenecteplase.

Methods

Technically adequate scans with perfusion defects and follow up imaging from 2 RCTs comparing alteplase with tenecteplase in AIS were analysed. Volumes of ischaemic core (relative cerebral blood flow <30%), ischaemic penumbra (delay time >3seconds and rCBF>30%), and extraction fraction >30% (E30) were calculated (MiStar). The proportion of E30 within the ischaemic lesion (E30%) was calculated. Logistic regression was used to identify factors predictive of HT defined as any intracranial haemorrhage by ECASS-2 criteria.

Results

Of 118 cases, 53 received alteplase and 65 tenecteplase. Baseline clinical and imaging characteristics were similar. HT occurred in 22/53 (41%) of alteplase and 19/65 (29%) of tenecteplase cases. Comparing HT and non-HT cases, a higher E30% was seen with tenecteplase (mean difference +15.9%, p=0.004) but not alteplase (+9.4% p=0.110). In a logistic regression model, baseline NIHSS and E30% were independently predictive of HT when correcting for age, systolic BP, antiplatelet history, and onset-to-treatment time. After adjustment for these variables there was a trend for reduced HT incidence with tenecteplase compared to alteplase (OR0.44(0.19-1.02), p=0.056).

graph.png

Conclusions

After adjustment for clinical and imaging variables, there was a trend for lower incidence of HT with tenecteplase than alteplase. Future trials comparing alteplase and tenecteplase present an opportunity to evaluate relationships between drug allocation, HT and E30%.

Trial Registration Number

ATTEST - 2010-024541-67 ( EudraCT Number )

A Randomized Trial of Tenecteplase versus Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke - Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12608000466347

Hide

Availability

1st Sept 2021 1330-1430 CEST (1230-1330 UK time)
Hide

Е-Poster Audio MP3

Hide