Proffered Paper session Proffered Paper Session

A Phase 1b/2 Study of Omaveloxolone in Combination with Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma

Presentation Number
5O_PR
Lecture Time
09:00 - 09:15
Speakers
  • Sapna P. Patel
Session Name
Proffered Paper session
Location
Room A, Geneva Palexpo, Geneva, Switzerland
Date
08.12.2017
Time
08:30 - 10:30
Authors
  • Sapna P. Patel
  • F. Stephen Hodi
  • Dmitry Gabrilovich
  • Melanie Chin
  • Geoff Gibney
  • Angie Goldsberry
  • Rene Gonzalez
  • Jason Hurt
  • Joseph Markowitz
  • Eric Whitman
  • Colin Meyer
  • April Salama

Abstract

Background

Omaveloxolone (Omav) reduces production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species by myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and restores immune surveillance in preclinical cancer models. Administration of Omav with checkpoint inhibitors (CI) may enhance the anti-tumor immune response of immunotherapies. A Phase 1b/2 study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Omav in combination with ipilimumab (Ipi) or nivolumab (Nivo) for treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Data from the ongoing Phase 1b study are reported.

Methods

Patients with or without prior exposure to CI, and with >5% of tumor cells from a screening biopsy positive for inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) were enrolled. Serial biopsies were also collected at Weeks 2 and 13. Omav monotherapy (5, 10, 20, 100, or 150 mg PO QD) was dosed continuously starting one week prior to CI initiation (Ipi x 4 doses or Nivo q 2 weeks). Primary objectives were safety, MTD, and ORR measured via RECIST v1.1.

Results

At data cutoff, 39 patients were enrolled (Omav + Ipi: n=12; Omav + Nivo: n=27) with median treatment duration of 13 weeks. Of 30 patients with evaluable tumor restaging, 7/30 (23%) of patients were CI-naïve, while 23/30 (77%) of patients were refractory to prior CI therapy. The ORR (confirmed + unconfirmed) observed in all evaluable patients was 8/30 (27%, 6 partial response (PR) and 2 complete response (CR)) and 4/7 (57%) in CI-naïve patients, including 1 CR. 3/18 (17%) patients treated with Omav + Nivo who were refractory to prior CI therapies had objective responses including 1 CR. Omav was associated with decreases in tumor iNOS, PD-L1, and IDO-1 expression. The MTD for Omav has not been established since no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. No serious AEs considered related to Omav have been reported to date. Commonly reported treatment-related adverse events included fatigue, nausea, pruritus, transaminase increases and decreased appetite.

Conclusions

Omav was well tolerated at doses up to 150 mg in combination with CI and initial efficacy data suggest that Omav may overcome CI resistance. The Phase 2 portion of the trial will study the effects of Omav with Nivo in patients refractory to prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies.

Clinical trial identification

NCT02259231

Collapse