Mini oral session 1 (ID 48) Mini oral session

10O - Comparison of patient populations identified by different PD-L1 assays in in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (ID 556)

Presentation Number
10O
Lecture Time
17:00 - 17:05
Speakers
  • Marietta Scott (Cambridge, United Kingdom)
Location
Vienna Hall, MARITIM Hotel Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Date
02.05.2019
Time
16:30 - 17:40

Abstract

Background

TNBC represents an unmet clinical need; the IMPassion 130 and KEYNOTE-086 trials have demonstrated efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 targeted therapeutics in the metastatic/unresectable first line setting, with increased response in PD-L1 high populations, defined using different diagnostic assays and algorithms. This work addresses the need to establish PD-L1 assay concordance in TNBC.

Methods

196 TNBC cases were stained by IHC using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263), VENTANA PD-L1 (SP142), Dako PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx and Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assays. A single pathologist scored the proportions of membrane staining tumour cells (TC), staining immune cells (IC) and tumour occupied by immune cells. The proportion of tumour occupied by staining immune cells (ICTA) and Combined Positive Score (CPS) were derived. Concordance between assays was evaluated using the Spearman coefficient ρ. Concordance in patient status was assessed using overall, positive and negative percent agreement (OPA/PPA/NPA) at matched algorithms and cut-offs.

Results

SP263, 22C3 and 28-8 assays showed good analytical correlation for TC staining (ρ = 0.84–0.89), but lower for SP142 (0.44-0.46), whereas all assays showed good correlation for ICTA (0.77-0.96) and CPS (0.78-0.95). OPA ranged from 58%–97% at matched algorithms (Table). Prevalence for SP142 ICTA≥1% and 22C3 CPS≥1 was in-line with IMPassion 130 and KEYNOTE-086, respectively.

Prevalence (%) and OPA (%) of VENTANA SP263 with other assays at matched cut-offs

SP26322C322C328-828-8SP142SP142
Cut-offPrevalencePrevalenceOPAPrevalenceOPAPrevalenceOPA
TC ≥ 1%53509146881158
ICTA≥1%54519652973278
CPS≥164609261953571

Conclusions

Analytical performance between SP263, 22C3 and 28-8 is very similar; SP142 stains fewer TCs and ICs. In contrast to other cancer types, in TNBC, TC scores are lower and IC scores are higher. Care should be taken when interchanging PD-L1 assays and interpreting efficacy data derived with different algorithms in TNBC; whilst SP263 would identify largely the same PD-L1 patient population as on KEYNOTE-086, it could potentially identify 22% additional cases as PD-L1 high than on IMPassion 130.

Legal entity responsible for the study

AstraZeneca.

Funding

AstraZeneca.

Disclosure

M. Scott, P. Scorer, C. Barker: Employee, shareholder: AstraZeneca. H. Al-Masri: Employee: Hematogenix.

Collapse