Mini oral session 1 (ID 48) Mini oral session

LBA3 - A pragmatic, randomised, multicentre trial comparing 4-weekly vs. 12-weekly administration of bone-targeted agents (denosumab, zoledronate or pamidronate) in patients with bone metastases (ID 398)

Presentation Number
LBA3
Lecture Time
16:30 - 16:35
Speakers
  • Mark Clemons (Ottawa, Canada)
Location
Vienna Hall, MARITIM Hotel Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Date
02.05.2019
Time
16:30 - 17:40

Abstract

Background

Defining the optimal dosing interval of bone-targeted agents (BTAs), such as denosumab (DN) and bisphosphonates, for patients (pts) with bone metastases remains an important clinical question. We performed a pragmatic randomised trial comparing the non-inferiority of 12- vs. 4-weekly BTAs in pts with breast and prostate cancer. We present data from the breast cohort.

Methods

Breast cancer pts who were either BTA-naïve, or already receiving, DN, zoledronate (ZA) or pamidronate (PAM) were eligible. They were randomised to their chosen BTA every 12- or 4-weeks for one year. The primary endpoint was Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) (EORTC-QLQ-C30 Functional Domain-Physical Subdomain). Secondary endpoints included: pain (EORTC-QLQ-BM22-pain domain), Global Health Status (EORTC-QLQ-C30), symptomatic skeletal event (SSE) rates and SSE-free survival (composite of time to first SSE and time to death). Adverse events and toxicity were also compared.

Results

Of 160 breast cancer pts, 79 (49.4%) were randomised to 12- and 81 (50.6%) to 4-weekly therapy. 64 pts (40%) were BTA naïve. BTAs included; DN (n = 60, 37.5%), ZA (n = 48, 30%) or PAM (n = 52, 32.5%). Study-reported outcomes showed no significant difference in change from baseline in: HRQL-physical domain (median [range]: 0 [-87,20] vs. 0 [-66,53]), pain (median [range]: 0 [-80,33] vs. 0 [-27,20]), Global Health Status (median [range]: 0 [-67,50] vs. 0 [-50,42]) between the 12- and 4-weekly arms, respectively. Five (6%) and 7 (9%) pts had an SSE within 2 years and 1-year SSE-free survival was 65% (95% CI:52-75%) and 80% (69-88%) in the 12- and 4-weekly arms, respectively. Changes in dosing schedules were more common in the 4-weekly arm (17% vs 31%). Results were similar for subgroup analyses for BTA naïve and pre-treated pts, and for pts receiving DN, ZA or PAM.

Conclusions

The findings of this trial are consistent with those previously reported for de-escalating ZA. This trial also included pts receiving de-escalated DN and PAM. While the results of the REDUSE trial are awaited, the data presented would suggest that de-escalation of commonly used BTAs is a reasonable treatment option.

Clinical trial identification

NCT02721433.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute.

Funding

The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and The Ottawa Hospital Foundation.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Collapse