Chris J. Edgar, United Kingdom

Cogstate Clinical science
Dr. Chris Edgar has an extensive background in the application of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) in drug development and has worked in the pharmaceutical industry for the past 20 years. He is the former scientific director of Cognitive Drug Research Ltd. developers of CDR System, one of the earliest computerized cognitive test systems to be widely employed in clinical trials. Chris also has a background in COA management and rater training delivery with Bracket/UBC; and CNS/neuroscience clinical trial design and outcomes research with Roche and as an independent consultant. Chris is a psychologist with expertise in clinical trials methodology, COA implementation, and related regulatory science topics. Chris’s research seeks to carefully define and apply clinical endpoints to answer key questions throughout the clinical development plan and product life-cycle. Chris has published over 20 research articles in international peer-reviewed scientific journals.

Author Of 2 Presentations

VALIDITY AND SENSITIVITY OF THE COGSTATE BRIEF BATTERY FOR IN-CLINIC AND AT-HOME COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT IN ADNI-3

Session Type
SYMPOSIUM
Date
12.03.2021, Friday
Session Time
08:00 - 10:00
Room
On Demand Symposia B
Lecture Time
08:15 - 08:30
Session Icon
On-Demand

Abstract

Aims

The Cogstate Brief Battery (CBB) is a computerized cognitive assessment validated for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and unsupervised use. The CBB assesses processing speed, attention, visual learning, and working memory. The CBB is offered to cognitively normal (CN) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) participants in ADNI-3. In-clinic visits are completed annually for MCI and every other year for CN, with both groups completing unsupervised assessments at-home within 14 days of the first in-clinic visit and every 3 months.

Methods

CBB data were analyzed for eight outcome measures to evaluate sensitivity to disease status (CN, MCI), effect of setting (in-clinic, at-home), and change over time.

Results

Data were analyzed for 697 participants (459 CN, 222 MCI, 12 AD). Fewer participants completed a first at-home (n=365) versus a first in-clinic assessment (n=629). Statistically significant, small-moderate effect size differences between CN and MCI/AD (0.34 to 0.72) were evident at the first in-clinic visit. Effect size differences for in-clinic versus first at-home assessment, were small (<0.01 to 0.29) and non-significant, except for faster working memory reaction times at-home. Linear mixed models for participants completing 24 months (n=171), showed evidence for divergence between CN and MCI over time, a finding most evident on the learning and memory tests. Inclusion of amyloid status supported a predicted pattern of poorer cognition in amyloid positive participants.

Conclusions

Data from ADNI-3 support the validity and sensitivity of the CBB for unsupervised, at-home assessment, demonstrating known groups validity, equivalence between in-clinic and at-home assessment, and longitudinal sensitivity.

Hide

Presenter of 2 Presentations

VALIDITY AND SENSITIVITY OF THE COGSTATE BRIEF BATTERY FOR IN-CLINIC AND AT-HOME COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT IN ADNI-3

Session Type
SYMPOSIUM
Date
12.03.2021, Friday
Session Time
08:00 - 10:00
Room
On Demand Symposia B
Lecture Time
08:15 - 08:30
Session Icon
On-Demand

Abstract

Aims

The Cogstate Brief Battery (CBB) is a computerized cognitive assessment validated for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and unsupervised use. The CBB assesses processing speed, attention, visual learning, and working memory. The CBB is offered to cognitively normal (CN) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) participants in ADNI-3. In-clinic visits are completed annually for MCI and every other year for CN, with both groups completing unsupervised assessments at-home within 14 days of the first in-clinic visit and every 3 months.

Methods

CBB data were analyzed for eight outcome measures to evaluate sensitivity to disease status (CN, MCI), effect of setting (in-clinic, at-home), and change over time.

Results

Data were analyzed for 697 participants (459 CN, 222 MCI, 12 AD). Fewer participants completed a first at-home (n=365) versus a first in-clinic assessment (n=629). Statistically significant, small-moderate effect size differences between CN and MCI/AD (0.34 to 0.72) were evident at the first in-clinic visit. Effect size differences for in-clinic versus first at-home assessment, were small (<0.01 to 0.29) and non-significant, except for faster working memory reaction times at-home. Linear mixed models for participants completing 24 months (n=171), showed evidence for divergence between CN and MCI over time, a finding most evident on the learning and memory tests. Inclusion of amyloid status supported a predicted pattern of poorer cognition in amyloid positive participants.

Conclusions

Data from ADNI-3 support the validity and sensitivity of the CBB for unsupervised, at-home assessment, demonstrating known groups validity, equivalence between in-clinic and at-home assessment, and longitudinal sensitivity.

Hide