Sarah J. Eger, United States of America

Stanford University Neurology and Neurological Sciences

Author Of 2 Presentations

A NOVEL AGE-INFORMED APPROACH FOR GENETIC ASSOCIATION ANALYSIS IN ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE

Session Type
SYMPOSIUM
Date
12.03.2021, Friday
Session Time
10:00 - 12:00
Room
On Demand Symposia E
Lecture Time
11:15 - 11:30
Session Icon
On-Demand

Abstract

Aims

Most Alzheimer’s disease (AD) genetic association studies disregard age or incorrectly account for it, hampering variant discovery.

Methods

Using simulated data, we compared the statistical power of several models: logistic regression on AD diagnosis adjusted and not adjusted for age; linear regression on a score integrating case-control status and age; and multivariate Cox regression on age-at-onset. We applied these models to real exome-wide data of 11,127 sequenced individuals and replicated suggestive associations in 21,631 genotype-imputed individuals (Table1).

Table1. Demographics for discovery and replication samples.

Sample

N

(% females)

Age

μ(σ)

Discovery

Controls

5075(59.0)

85.2(5.4)

AD cases

6052(57.8)

76.3(8.2)

Replication

Controls

10539(59.4)

76.7(8.5)

AD cases

11092(60.5)

73.3(9.3)

Results

Modelling variable AD risk across age results in 10-20% statistical power gain compared to logistic regression without age adjustment, while incorrect age adjustment leads to critical power loss (Figure1). Applying our novel AD-age score and/or Cox regression, we discovered and replicated novel variants associated with AD (Figure2).

picture2.png

Figure1. Power of different association models evaluated for a common variant with moderate effect size. A-C) Simulation based on 1000/1000 cases/controls at a significance level of α=0.05, for age differences observed in AD cohorts.

picture1.png

Figure2. Manhattan plots of exome-wide-associations in the four models. No suggestive association were observed (p<1×10-5) for the age adjusted logistic regression. TREM2 known causal variant is exome-wide-significant (p<5×10-7) in the other models. Among suggestive associations, known AD associations are in red, novel associations which replicate (p<0.05) in an independent dataset are in blue.

Conclusions

Our AD-age score provides a simple means for statistical power gain.

Hide

ASSOCIATION OF APOE SPLICE QTLS WITH ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE RISK IN APOE*4/4 CARRIERS.

Session Type
SYMPOSIUM
Date
13.03.2021, Saturday
Session Time
10:00 - 12:00
Room
On Demand Symposia D
Lecture Time
11:00 - 11:15
Session Icon
On-Demand

Abstract

Aims

Determine whether APOE splice quantitative trait locus (sQTL) variants affect APOE4-related risk for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), age-at-AD-onset, and APOE protein levels.

Methods

Participants (N=25,120) were ages 60+, non-Hispanic, of European ancestry, had APOE genotype available, and diagnosed as cases or controls. Only rs157580 and rs439401 APOE sQTLs were genotyped in >80% of the available sample and further investigated. Associations of APOE sQTLs with AD risk (mixed model case-control regression) and log-normalized age-at-AD-onset (linear mixed model) were evaluated in APOE*3/4 and APOE*4/4 carriers. Associations with APOE protein levels were evaluated in post-mortem dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) tissue from APOE*3/4 carriers (APOE*4/4 not considered due to sample paucity).

Results

Rs157580 and rs439401 reduced AD risk in APOE*4/4 carriers (Table1). Rs157580 also increased age-at-AD-onset in APOE*4/4 (beta=0.027, P-value=0.023) and APOE*3/4 carriers (beta=0.004, P-value=0.089). Rs157580 increased APOE protein levels in the dlPFC of APOE*3/4 carriers (Figure1).

Table1. Association of APOE sQTLs with AD risk.
Stratum SNP CN/AD (N) CN/AD (MAF) OR(CI) P-value
APOE*4/4 rs157580 237/1629 4.2%/1.9% 0.39 (0.20-0.74) 4.00E-3
APOE*3/4 rs157580 2662/5607 23.2%/22.6% 0.96 (0.87-1.05) 0.33
APOE*4/4 rs439401 237/1652 3.6%/0.6% 0.10 (0.04-0.24) 2.00E-7
APOE*3/4 rs439401 2702/5734 24.8%/24.3% 0.97 (0.88-1.06) 0.47

MAF=minor allele frequency; CN=control, OR=odds ratio; CI=95% confidence interval.

apoe_sqtl_rosmap.jpg

Figure1. Association of rs157580 with APOE protein levels. Error bars show 95-percentile range. X-axis indicates genotypes and sample sizes.

Conclusions

Our results bring new insights into mechanisms that alter APOE expression and how this affects APOE4-related AD risk. This is crucially relevant for the development of AD drug therapies aimed at APOE4.

Hide